From a business perspective, Southeast Asia has long been an interesting, but unsynchronized, collection of smaller markets. That is rapidly changing.
More than 11 years in the making, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is to come into existence on Dec. 31. The dream of a single market and production base encompassing the 10 members of ASEAN is to become formal reality, a milestone in a project which looks set to deliver a new round of growth and opportunities for regional and international investors.
An economically unified ASEAN would represent a market of an estimated 640 million people with a combined GDP of US$2.4 trillion. If it were a nation, it would already be the world’s seventh-largest economy, 25 percent larger than India. Consultancy firm McKinsey & Co forecasts that the number of middle-class households in the region will more than double to 163 million between now and 2030.
The road has been long, and the celebrations at the end of this year will not mark the end of the journey. The latest AEC update came out in 2012, and estimates that member nations had achieved 67.5 percent of their integration targets. Further progress has been made since, but some of the most thorny issues — including free trade in food products and key service sectors — remain works in progress.
ASEAN is also spectacularly diverse, making the creation of a one-size-fits-all market even more challenging. In 2012, GDP per capita in Singapore, ASEAN’s richest member, was more than 20 times that of Myanmar, its poorest, according to ADB Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014; the community embraces everything from an absolute monarchy to nations with roots in communism; and it is founded on the principle of non-interference, which means that all members have to agree on measures before they can be implemented.
However, even if the community is not perfect and fully formed, its establishment will mark a milestone by underlining its members’ commitment to walking a one-way path to greater integration.
The pace of convergence has recently accelerated as the potential synergies — the opportunity to create something that is substantially greater than the sum of its parts — become clearer. The region’s diversity is a challenge, but it is also an unmatched opportunity for self-sustaining growth: There are resource suppliers and resource consumers; high-value-added producers making the goods that aspirational high-volume, low-margin producers want and vice versa; and there is a clear understanding that together they can take on the world’s biggest producers and markets on their own terms.
To achieve this, ASEAN must maintain the momentum toward integration. The final steps to a common market are likely to be the hardest because they will have the most impact on domestic interests, but they will also be the most important if the region is to fulfill its aims of sustainable and equitable growth.
There are three interlinked priorities: trade connectivity, financial connectivity and physical connectivity.
The group needs to keep up the pressure to dismantle tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, including for services industries. Much of Asia’s new growth, particularly in middle-income countries like Thailand and Malaysia, is going to come from the services sector, and progress will be both faster and more stable if it can draw on a regional rather than a national talent pool.
This is particularly important when it comes to financial services. Frictionless cross-border banking will facilitate the growth of supply chains, both in terms of geographic breadth and skills depth, and allow the pooling of assets for vital investments in the next phase of growth.
And that means infrastructure. Without significantly more investment in the physical hardware of connectivity — the roads, railways and ports that make trade possible — and the financial architecture to pay for it, the dream of a self-sustaining ASEAN economic powerhouse will never be fully realized.
The need for better infrastructure is widely recognized, but the region is struggling to find a sustainable way to pay for it. Asia has traditionally relied on bank loans for its financing needs, but the scale and duration of the demand for infrastructure investment puts it in a different league.
ASEAN needs deeper, better connected and more efficient local debt and equity capital markets to transform its savings into investment for the next phase of growth, and it needs a harmonized regulatory system to protect both lenders and borrowers.
The full AEC vision is of a region connected physically, commercially and financially. Dec. 31 will be important, but it marks neither the beginning nor the end of the process. The community’s framers can look back at their achievements with pride, but it is more important that they look forward with determination.
Noel Quinn is group general manager and regional head of HSBC Commercial Banking, Asia-Pacific.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS