From a business perspective, Southeast Asia has long been an interesting, but unsynchronized, collection of smaller markets. That is rapidly changing.
More than 11 years in the making, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is to come into existence on Dec. 31. The dream of a single market and production base encompassing the 10 members of ASEAN is to become formal reality, a milestone in a project which looks set to deliver a new round of growth and opportunities for regional and international investors.
An economically unified ASEAN would represent a market of an estimated 640 million people with a combined GDP of US$2.4 trillion. If it were a nation, it would already be the world’s seventh-largest economy, 25 percent larger than India. Consultancy firm McKinsey & Co forecasts that the number of middle-class households in the region will more than double to 163 million between now and 2030.
The road has been long, and the celebrations at the end of this year will not mark the end of the journey. The latest AEC update came out in 2012, and estimates that member nations had achieved 67.5 percent of their integration targets. Further progress has been made since, but some of the most thorny issues — including free trade in food products and key service sectors — remain works in progress.
ASEAN is also spectacularly diverse, making the creation of a one-size-fits-all market even more challenging. In 2012, GDP per capita in Singapore, ASEAN’s richest member, was more than 20 times that of Myanmar, its poorest, according to ADB Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014; the community embraces everything from an absolute monarchy to nations with roots in communism; and it is founded on the principle of non-interference, which means that all members have to agree on measures before they can be implemented.
However, even if the community is not perfect and fully formed, its establishment will mark a milestone by underlining its members’ commitment to walking a one-way path to greater integration.
The pace of convergence has recently accelerated as the potential synergies — the opportunity to create something that is substantially greater than the sum of its parts — become clearer. The region’s diversity is a challenge, but it is also an unmatched opportunity for self-sustaining growth: There are resource suppliers and resource consumers; high-value-added producers making the goods that aspirational high-volume, low-margin producers want and vice versa; and there is a clear understanding that together they can take on the world’s biggest producers and markets on their own terms.
To achieve this, ASEAN must maintain the momentum toward integration. The final steps to a common market are likely to be the hardest because they will have the most impact on domestic interests, but they will also be the most important if the region is to fulfill its aims of sustainable and equitable growth.
There are three interlinked priorities: trade connectivity, financial connectivity and physical connectivity.
The group needs to keep up the pressure to dismantle tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, including for services industries. Much of Asia’s new growth, particularly in middle-income countries like Thailand and Malaysia, is going to come from the services sector, and progress will be both faster and more stable if it can draw on a regional rather than a national talent pool.
This is particularly important when it comes to financial services. Frictionless cross-border banking will facilitate the growth of supply chains, both in terms of geographic breadth and skills depth, and allow the pooling of assets for vital investments in the next phase of growth.
And that means infrastructure. Without significantly more investment in the physical hardware of connectivity — the roads, railways and ports that make trade possible — and the financial architecture to pay for it, the dream of a self-sustaining ASEAN economic powerhouse will never be fully realized.
The need for better infrastructure is widely recognized, but the region is struggling to find a sustainable way to pay for it. Asia has traditionally relied on bank loans for its financing needs, but the scale and duration of the demand for infrastructure investment puts it in a different league.
ASEAN needs deeper, better connected and more efficient local debt and equity capital markets to transform its savings into investment for the next phase of growth, and it needs a harmonized regulatory system to protect both lenders and borrowers.
The full AEC vision is of a region connected physically, commercially and financially. Dec. 31 will be important, but it marks neither the beginning nor the end of the process. The community’s framers can look back at their achievements with pride, but it is more important that they look forward with determination.
Noel Quinn is group general manager and regional head of HSBC Commercial Banking, Asia-Pacific.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS