From a business perspective, Southeast Asia has long been an interesting, but unsynchronized, collection of smaller markets. That is rapidly changing.
More than 11 years in the making, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is to come into existence on Dec. 31. The dream of a single market and production base encompassing the 10 members of ASEAN is to become formal reality, a milestone in a project which looks set to deliver a new round of growth and opportunities for regional and international investors.
An economically unified ASEAN would represent a market of an estimated 640 million people with a combined GDP of US$2.4 trillion. If it were a nation, it would already be the world’s seventh-largest economy, 25 percent larger than India. Consultancy firm McKinsey & Co forecasts that the number of middle-class households in the region will more than double to 163 million between now and 2030.
The road has been long, and the celebrations at the end of this year will not mark the end of the journey. The latest AEC update came out in 2012, and estimates that member nations had achieved 67.5 percent of their integration targets. Further progress has been made since, but some of the most thorny issues — including free trade in food products and key service sectors — remain works in progress.
ASEAN is also spectacularly diverse, making the creation of a one-size-fits-all market even more challenging. In 2012, GDP per capita in Singapore, ASEAN’s richest member, was more than 20 times that of Myanmar, its poorest, according to ADB Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2014; the community embraces everything from an absolute monarchy to nations with roots in communism; and it is founded on the principle of non-interference, which means that all members have to agree on measures before they can be implemented.
However, even if the community is not perfect and fully formed, its establishment will mark a milestone by underlining its members’ commitment to walking a one-way path to greater integration.
The pace of convergence has recently accelerated as the potential synergies — the opportunity to create something that is substantially greater than the sum of its parts — become clearer. The region’s diversity is a challenge, but it is also an unmatched opportunity for self-sustaining growth: There are resource suppliers and resource consumers; high-value-added producers making the goods that aspirational high-volume, low-margin producers want and vice versa; and there is a clear understanding that together they can take on the world’s biggest producers and markets on their own terms.
To achieve this, ASEAN must maintain the momentum toward integration. The final steps to a common market are likely to be the hardest because they will have the most impact on domestic interests, but they will also be the most important if the region is to fulfill its aims of sustainable and equitable growth.
There are three interlinked priorities: trade connectivity, financial connectivity and physical connectivity.
The group needs to keep up the pressure to dismantle tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, including for services industries. Much of Asia’s new growth, particularly in middle-income countries like Thailand and Malaysia, is going to come from the services sector, and progress will be both faster and more stable if it can draw on a regional rather than a national talent pool.
This is particularly important when it comes to financial services. Frictionless cross-border banking will facilitate the growth of supply chains, both in terms of geographic breadth and skills depth, and allow the pooling of assets for vital investments in the next phase of growth.
And that means infrastructure. Without significantly more investment in the physical hardware of connectivity — the roads, railways and ports that make trade possible — and the financial architecture to pay for it, the dream of a self-sustaining ASEAN economic powerhouse will never be fully realized.
The need for better infrastructure is widely recognized, but the region is struggling to find a sustainable way to pay for it. Asia has traditionally relied on bank loans for its financing needs, but the scale and duration of the demand for infrastructure investment puts it in a different league.
ASEAN needs deeper, better connected and more efficient local debt and equity capital markets to transform its savings into investment for the next phase of growth, and it needs a harmonized regulatory system to protect both lenders and borrowers.
The full AEC vision is of a region connected physically, commercially and financially. Dec. 31 will be important, but it marks neither the beginning nor the end of the process. The community’s framers can look back at their achievements with pride, but it is more important that they look forward with determination.
Noel Quinn is group general manager and regional head of HSBC Commercial Banking, Asia-Pacific.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS