Be proud of your nation’s flag
First, a quick introduction. I am a Canadian in my mid-50s and am thoroughly enjoying my first visit to Taiwan. The people are wonderful, the transportation inexpensive and the sights wonderful.
I believe Taiwan to be a hidden gem, which many of my fellow Canadians should consider visiting, but for some reason it does not seem to be as common as other Pacific Rim destinations, and that is a shame because the country has much to offer to a visitor.
But, I digress.
When I read Torch Pratt’s letter concerning Taiwan’s national flag (Letters, March 21, page 8), I must confess I was more than a little surprised. This was the first I had ever heard about the issue. That said, I think I can share something from my nation’s history that you might find of interest.
Everyone recognizes the Canadian flag for what it is — two vertical red bands, with a central white panel that holds a symbolic maple leaf. Canadians love our flag, and it always warms my heart when I see it displayed in a foreign country, as it’s a symbol of my homeland.
However, this was not always the case. Prior to 1965, the Canadian flag had nothing in common with the current one. The old flag contained a big red panel, with the national crest on the right-hand side, and the British Union Jack in the upper left quadrant.
In 1965, it was proposed that Canada replaced its flag with one that was distinctly Canadian. As much as most Canadians appreciate being part of the British Commonwealth, we wanted our own unique identity. In ways I suspect not unlike a teenager wanting to begin to spread their wings of independence — still loving their parents, but wanting to show autonomy and their own uniqueness.
The concept of a new flag was not met with fully open arms. Many people who had fought in World War I or World War II under the old flag were very upset about this, as was one of the national political party leaders. However, the younger generation were more open to the concept, and the search for a new flag began. After many unusual prototypes were presented, the current flag was finally selected, and the rest is history.
I heard concerns expressed that when shown in small format, the Taiwanese flag might be confused with that of Myanmar. I do not think that is anything to be concerned about. If you shrink down the Canadian flag and show it beside the flag of Peru, those two flags could also be potentially confused.
However, most of the time one looks at their national flag is when its flying in the breezes of their native land and there is no mistaking it for anything other than what it is. When I see it on the tail of an Air Canada aircraft, I do not mistake it for anything else.
To me, the Taiwanese flag appears to be a nice combination of esthetically pleasing components, bold color combinations and not the somewhat boring (please forgive me, those who come from countries that have this) a two or three panel spread of basic colors. If you really want to confuse flags, try to remember which combination of horizontal color panels represents which country. Canada’s red maple leaf and Taiwan’s bold white sun ensure that confusion does not happen.
As an outsider, I fully recognize my input has little merit in what Taiwanese as a people choose to do. That is entirely the choice of the people of Taiwan as a democratic nation.
All I want to say is this: Whatever you choose to do, embrace your flag with open arms. Love it, cherish it and be proud of it representing you around the world, wherever your travels might take you.
Calvin Pond
Calgary, Canada
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS