Taiwan faces a persistently serious youth employment problem. With the unemployment rate for college graduates nearly three times that of the whole workforce and low starting salaries, the government has in recent years launched several programs that offer job search assistance, skills training, wage subsidies and counseling to increase employment opportunities for young people.
In this Internet era, which is characterized by an increased cross-border flow of goods, services, money and people, policymakers are encouraging entrepreneurship to spur job creation and economic growth. For example, the Cabinet-level National Development Fund is cooperating with local and foreign venture capital firms to finance local start-ups, with the NT$1.5 billion (US$47.5 million) AppWorks Fund II launched last week by the fund and eight Taiwanese companies to help local startups that develop mobile, big data and Internet-related applications.
Moreover, governments at both the local and national level are developing special incubation programs to encourage young talent to start up their own businesses. A recent plan proposed by the Taipei City Government to create 10 technology start-up hubs is just one of the latest in a string of government efforts to encourage business innovation and young entrepreneurship in the nation.
However, to what extent policymakers are likely to achieve their goals is uncertain. The idea of developing Taiwan into Asia’s Silicon Valley depends on the government’s support, collaboration between the public and private sectors and the integration of related businesses and industries, such as e-commerce.
In a nutshell, if Taiwan hopes to create a successful start-up ecosystem, the nation needs to meet certain preconditions, such as: having a huge talent pool; well-developed infrastructure; an efficient administrative system; ample capital; marketing know-how; and international networks. Establishing an effective and feasible start-up policy is challenging, but at least now there is a sense of urgency to create a friendlier environment for young entrepreneurs.
While there is no shortage of ideas about how to nurture entrepreneurship in Taiwan, to some the debate still boils down to two fundamental questions: What happens if the government overlooks the fact that start-ups usually face high investment risks and low returns; and does heavy government support distort the market for genuinely viable businesses?
Furthermore, the debate becomes even more critical when deciding if it is necessary to build some areas into start-up clusters in the hope that those new businesses will scale up someday.
Looking overseas, not all governments seek to encourage start-ups through the establishment of start-up hubs or entrepreneurial incubators. Therefore, local government heads rushing to find places for their start-up hubs should seriously consider what it will take to support their idea. Without appropriate management, these hubs could one day become more of the so-called “mosquito halls,” which is what underused public facilities in Taiwan are called after they become nothing more than mosquito breeding grounds.
Meanwhile, if many of these hubs prove to be a waste of resources, central policymakers must consider how the economy would be affected if Taiwan’s industrial policy focused mainly on start-ups while lacking a systematic review mechanism for its growth engines.
Despite plenty of concern about the job prospects for young people, the government has the responsibility to present the public with a long-term blueprint for the development of the nation’s manufacturing and services sectors, and policymakers should also reflect on whether Taiwan is giving other small businesses in traditional domestic industries a chance to fulfill their dreams as well.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS