Bring back Peng-Lee show
Peng Wen-cheng (彭文正), a professor at National Taiwan University’s (NTU) School of Journalism, and his wife, Amanda Lee (李晶玉), resigned from hosting Next TV’s political talk show Jeng Chin Talk (正晶限時批) on Monday (“Media activists urge NCC to probe Next TV, Tzu Chi,” March 19, page 1).
This political talk show, which was hosted by Peng and Lee, jumped from ground level to the No. 1 talk show during its short life of 225 days.
The show’s name originates from the couple’s given names, and means “a straight and crystal clear express mail.” Their show was fair and objective. Several leading political commentators — mingzui (名嘴) or “famous mouths” — were invited to each show.
Peng is Hakka Taiwanese, and Lee is a descendant of a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government official. Peng supports independence or unification, whichever most Taiwanese prefer.
When former premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) wished to go back to NTU as a professor, Peng — in view of Jiang’s brutality in dealing with participants in the Sunflower movement — declared that he would quit his job at the school if Jiang were rehired.
Peng is very sharp and humorous, and occasionally used pertinent catch phrases in the show; while Lee is an intelligent and beautiful cohost.
Next TV should kindly invite Peng and Lee back to host the popular talk show which was named after them.
The Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, called “the light of Taiwan” (台灣之光) for its relief efforts in Taiwan and many parts of the world, should continue to shine brightly, but also allow a light to be shone on its own organization.
All organizations, including governments, political parties, corporations and religious and relief groups, as well as public figures, should be open-minded and welcome any evaluations and comments about their performance. They should never sue or exert pressure on commentators.
A free and democratic nation cannot survive without free speech and freedom of the press.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS