Bring back Peng-Lee show
Peng Wen-cheng (彭文正), a professor at National Taiwan University’s (NTU) School of Journalism, and his wife, Amanda Lee (李晶玉), resigned from hosting Next TV’s political talk show Jeng Chin Talk (正晶限時批) on Monday (“Media activists urge NCC to probe Next TV, Tzu Chi,” March 19, page 1).
This political talk show, which was hosted by Peng and Lee, jumped from ground level to the No. 1 talk show during its short life of 225 days.
The show’s name originates from the couple’s given names, and means “a straight and crystal clear express mail.” Their show was fair and objective. Several leading political commentators — mingzui (名嘴) or “famous mouths” — were invited to each show.
Peng is Hakka Taiwanese, and Lee is a descendant of a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government official. Peng supports independence or unification, whichever most Taiwanese prefer.
When former premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) wished to go back to NTU as a professor, Peng — in view of Jiang’s brutality in dealing with participants in the Sunflower movement — declared that he would quit his job at the school if Jiang were rehired.
Peng is very sharp and humorous, and occasionally used pertinent catch phrases in the show; while Lee is an intelligent and beautiful cohost.
Next TV should kindly invite Peng and Lee back to host the popular talk show which was named after them.
The Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, called “the light of Taiwan” (台灣之光) for its relief efforts in Taiwan and many parts of the world, should continue to shine brightly, but also allow a light to be shone on its own organization.
All organizations, including governments, political parties, corporations and religious and relief groups, as well as public figures, should be open-minded and welcome any evaluations and comments about their performance. They should never sue or exert pressure on commentators.
A free and democratic nation cannot survive without free speech and freedom of the press.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS