To be, or not to be 2G?
Second-generation officials and second-generation rich, born into privilege and power, find it much easier to occupy high positions than the poor. So much so that “2G Official” (官二代 ) and “2G Rich” (富二代) have become widely used terms in Taiwan.
In the US, the likely presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, is well-known as the wife of former US president Bill Clinton. The father and brother of potential Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush are both former presidents.
In Taiwan, the famous 2G official and 2G rich man Sean Lien (連勝文), son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), won the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) nomination for the Taipei mayoral election last year, but was defeated by political newcomer Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). KMT officials have enjoyed a position of privilege since they ruled in Taiwan and accumulated huge party assets.
On Feb. 15, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesperson Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) delivered a speech in Dallas, Texas, to the local Taiwanese association in which she said former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) accepted several billion New Taiwan dollars from construction magnates, and also questioned the qualifications of his son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中), to be nominated by the DPP to run in the next legislative election.
Chen Chih-chung has also been labeled as a 2G official in Taiwan. His defeat in the last legislative election four years ago resulted in the DPP losing the seat. As a matter of fact, Chen Chih-chung demonstrated solid skills when he debated with then-KMT legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅). Now, he has rejoined the DPP and regained his party membership. This time, he tried to follow the DPP’s rules to campaign for nomination.
However, Hsu’s allegation stirred up something of a mess for the DPP. Chen Chih-chung dropped out of the legislative race saying, although it was a hard decision to make, he did not want to cause a rift in the party and that he had to prioritize the interests of the DPP. He was able to step back and view the bigger picture. This is in marked contrast to Sean Lien, who insisted on representing the KMT in the Taipei mayoral election and was defeated by Ko.
Ko has done a great job in cracking down on the corruption left by his predecessors, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Recently, he called the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation’s development project in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) “very strange.” Pandora’s box has been opened for Tzu Chi, a charitable non-profit, tax-exempt organization that went into the stock market and invested in tobacco and arms dealers.
“When others starve, I starve; when others are flooded, I drown.”
Taiwanese always take care of others and donate money to those who suffer from natural disasters. On March 12, 2012, then-minister of the interior Lee Hung-yuan (李鴻源) confirmed that the Taiwan Red Cross received NT$2.5 billion (US$79.4 million) for the victims of the Japanese tsunami, but only donated NT$0.9 billion. What a shame those donations could not reach those who were in need.
To be a 2G official in itself is not a sin, but misusing one’s privilege and power like Tzu Chi and the Taiwan Red Cross is an unforgiveable crime that must stop, so it is time for us to enforce citizen oversight.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Taiwan’s flag ROCks
Several recent op-eds explain in detail why Taiwan’s current flag is just another foreign import that is illegitimate and should be abolished. I believe this comports with historical facts.
However, I embrace the flag and I have the Republic of China flag painted on my toenails. The big toes are blue with a hand-painted white sun, or “Sen” I guess. The other toes are painted “Taiwan Red,” a color slightly deeper than that flag with the five yellow stars.
I am sure people jump to all kinds of conclusions when they see me walking around Taipei barefoot with my flag toenails. I am trying to shatter stereotypes.
“Is he a gay supporter of the KMT?” they wonder, and I am like: “No, that’s our president.”
Most transit commuters have gotten used to it, and hardly anyone asks to take pictures of my feet anymore.
We really have two choices: Either embrace the flag we have, or pick a new one. Taiwan’s current flag gets a lot of online flack because when reduced for Web site purposes, it looks almost the same as Myanmar’s flag.
While I agree in principle with the yellow tiger on the dark blue background flag, that too will look like a blob when it is reduced for the Web.
I believe we should rally around Taiwan’s flag for the simple reason that it’s the only one we have. People around the world complained when Taiwan’s flag was removed from Olympic sites. Kids wave them at sports matches. Sure, we may be the red-headed stepchild of the UN, but this is surely the best symbol that Taiwan has right now.
I’m not saying that Taiwan’s youth has been indoctrinated to love the flag, and in fact many of them don’t, but many kids identify with it, and we need a simple national icon that we can rally around.
I have a large Taiwan flag that I “appropriated” from a local bridge while riding my bike after it fell to the sidewalk. At home, I used white acrylic in all caps and large letters to write “liberty accountability transparency” in the red area. It is unclear whether I can be deported for that if they catch me.
I often say that Taiwan is “the best non-country in the world,” and both locals and foreigners laugh at that joke. We are better off than Palestine, for example.
I was adopted as an infant, and I feel deeply for orphans and displaced kids. After feeling displaced in the US, I moved to Taiwan 15 years ago, and this place is a complete heaven. It is my home now, and Taiwanese are my family, neighbors and friends. I am one of thousands of immigrants, and yes I am sentimental, but this is the only Taiwan flag I know.
I urge all partisan groups to either endorse Taiwan’s current flag or propose an acceptable new one.
Please note that I did not say “Taiwanese flag.” That should be up to the Taiwanese. Let us start a design contest.
Torch Pratt
Yonghe, New Taipei City
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS