To be, or not to be 2G?
Second-generation officials and second-generation rich, born into privilege and power, find it much easier to occupy high positions than the poor. So much so that “2G Official” (官二代 ) and “2G Rich” (富二代) have become widely used terms in Taiwan.
In the US, the likely presidential nominee of the Democratic Party, former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, is well-known as the wife of former US president Bill Clinton. The father and brother of potential Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush are both former presidents.
In Taiwan, the famous 2G official and 2G rich man Sean Lien (連勝文), son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), won the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) nomination for the Taipei mayoral election last year, but was defeated by political newcomer Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). KMT officials have enjoyed a position of privilege since they ruled in Taiwan and accumulated huge party assets.
On Feb. 15, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesperson Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) delivered a speech in Dallas, Texas, to the local Taiwanese association in which she said former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) accepted several billion New Taiwan dollars from construction magnates, and also questioned the qualifications of his son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中), to be nominated by the DPP to run in the next legislative election.
Chen Chih-chung has also been labeled as a 2G official in Taiwan. His defeat in the last legislative election four years ago resulted in the DPP losing the seat. As a matter of fact, Chen Chih-chung demonstrated solid skills when he debated with then-KMT legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅). Now, he has rejoined the DPP and regained his party membership. This time, he tried to follow the DPP’s rules to campaign for nomination.
However, Hsu’s allegation stirred up something of a mess for the DPP. Chen Chih-chung dropped out of the legislative race saying, although it was a hard decision to make, he did not want to cause a rift in the party and that he had to prioritize the interests of the DPP. He was able to step back and view the bigger picture. This is in marked contrast to Sean Lien, who insisted on representing the KMT in the Taipei mayoral election and was defeated by Ko.
Ko has done a great job in cracking down on the corruption left by his predecessors, Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Recently, he called the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation’s development project in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) “very strange.” Pandora’s box has been opened for Tzu Chi, a charitable non-profit, tax-exempt organization that went into the stock market and invested in tobacco and arms dealers.
“When others starve, I starve; when others are flooded, I drown.”
Taiwanese always take care of others and donate money to those who suffer from natural disasters. On March 12, 2012, then-minister of the interior Lee Hung-yuan (李鴻源) confirmed that the Taiwan Red Cross received NT$2.5 billion (US$79.4 million) for the victims of the Japanese tsunami, but only donated NT$0.9 billion. What a shame those donations could not reach those who were in need.
To be a 2G official in itself is not a sin, but misusing one’s privilege and power like Tzu Chi and the Taiwan Red Cross is an unforgiveable crime that must stop, so it is time for us to enforce citizen oversight.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Taiwan’s flag ROCks
Several recent op-eds explain in detail why Taiwan’s current flag is just another foreign import that is illegitimate and should be abolished. I believe this comports with historical facts.
However, I embrace the flag and I have the Republic of China flag painted on my toenails. The big toes are blue with a hand-painted white sun, or “Sen” I guess. The other toes are painted “Taiwan Red,” a color slightly deeper than that flag with the five yellow stars.
I am sure people jump to all kinds of conclusions when they see me walking around Taipei barefoot with my flag toenails. I am trying to shatter stereotypes.
“Is he a gay supporter of the KMT?” they wonder, and I am like: “No, that’s our president.”
Most transit commuters have gotten used to it, and hardly anyone asks to take pictures of my feet anymore.
We really have two choices: Either embrace the flag we have, or pick a new one. Taiwan’s current flag gets a lot of online flack because when reduced for Web site purposes, it looks almost the same as Myanmar’s flag.
While I agree in principle with the yellow tiger on the dark blue background flag, that too will look like a blob when it is reduced for the Web.
I believe we should rally around Taiwan’s flag for the simple reason that it’s the only one we have. People around the world complained when Taiwan’s flag was removed from Olympic sites. Kids wave them at sports matches. Sure, we may be the red-headed stepchild of the UN, but this is surely the best symbol that Taiwan has right now.
I’m not saying that Taiwan’s youth has been indoctrinated to love the flag, and in fact many of them don’t, but many kids identify with it, and we need a simple national icon that we can rally around.
I have a large Taiwan flag that I “appropriated” from a local bridge while riding my bike after it fell to the sidewalk. At home, I used white acrylic in all caps and large letters to write “liberty accountability transparency” in the red area. It is unclear whether I can be deported for that if they catch me.
I often say that Taiwan is “the best non-country in the world,” and both locals and foreigners laugh at that joke. We are better off than Palestine, for example.
I was adopted as an infant, and I feel deeply for orphans and displaced kids. After feeling displaced in the US, I moved to Taiwan 15 years ago, and this place is a complete heaven. It is my home now, and Taiwanese are my family, neighbors and friends. I am one of thousands of immigrants, and yes I am sentimental, but this is the only Taiwan flag I know.
I urge all partisan groups to either endorse Taiwan’s current flag or propose an acceptable new one.
Please note that I did not say “Taiwanese flag.” That should be up to the Taiwanese. Let us start a design contest.
Torch Pratt
Yonghe, New Taipei City
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS