Scientists say the devastation caused by Cyclone Pam, the most powerful cyclone to hit the South Pacific since records began, was aggravated by climate change. However, the effect the changing climate is having on tropical storms remains largely unresolved.
The president of Vanuatu on Monday told a conference in Japan that climate change had contributed to Pam’s impact on his nation. There are reports that 90 percent of the buildings in the capital Port Vila have been destroyed or damaged after the cyclone hit over the weekend. Six people are reported to have been killed.
Vanuatuan President Baldwin Lonsdale told delegates at a UN conference on disaster risk his people were being affected by more cyclones. He said this was a symptom of the climate crisis.
“We see the level of sea rise… The cyclone seasons, the warm, the rain, all this is affected... This year we have more than in any year… Yes, climate change is contributing to this.”
THERMODYNAMICS
Richard Betts, head of climate impacts research at the UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre, said the human contribution to sea level rise over the past 100 years was well documented and makes island nations more vulnerable to storms and particularly storm surge.
“When cyclones and other storms occur, there is already a greater risk of coastal flooding because the background sea level has risen, largely due to human-induced global warming. How much more flooding has occurred due to human action is unclear, but ongoing sea level rise can be expected to further increase this risk unless coastal protection can be improved,” he said.
University of Oxford climate scientist Myles Allen said while there is a suggestion cyclones may become more intense, the president’s assertion that climate change was causing more storms was not supported by science.
“It is a perfectly reasonable question for the president to be raising. Basic thermodynamics means that a warmer atmosphere, all other things being equal, makes more intense cyclones possible,” Allen said.
“But this does not mean cyclones have necessarily become more likely: Indeed, the latest assessment of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated explicitly that there is no clear evidence at present for any human-induced increase in tropic-wide cyclone frequency,” he said.
“On a personal level, I sympathize with the president’s evident frustration: He and the people of Vanuatu deserve an authoritative answer to the question of the role of past greenhouse gas emissions in Cyclone Pam. The science isn’t there yet, but we are getting there,” Allen said.
ACTIVE YEAR
By March it would be normal for around four cyclones to have formed in the South Pacific. However, as Lonsdale said on Monday, this year’s season has been particularly bad. Six cyclones have hit the region since the beginning of the year.
Reading University tropical meteorologist Pete Innes said it was impossible make any inference from a single season.
“It is a very active year, but a single active year doesn’t in itself indicate a trend. There isn’t apparently a long term trend,” he said.
Modelling expects cyclones in the South Pacific to shift southward and become 20 to 30 percent less frequent by the end of the century as a result of climate change, he said.
“The things that control the number of cyclones are other things like the wind speeds at different levels in the atmosphere,” he said. “There’s really complicated changes projected to happen to the winds speeds in [the South Pacific], which, in concert to the changes in sea temperature, actually seem to indicate that we would expect fewer cyclones in this area in the next 50 to 100 years.”
RESILIENCE BUILDING
Chris Holloway, a tropical storm expert at the University of Reading, said that while the total number of storms may reduce, the number of very intense storms, like Pam, may increase slightly.
“Tropical Cyclone Pam had the strongest winds of any South Pacific tropical cyclone on record, and is tied for having the strongest winds of any southern hemisphere tropical cyclone on record,” he said.
“Globally it is most likely that the total number of tropical cyclones will decrease with climate change while the number of the most intense storms, like Pam, will increase,” he said.
Ilan Kelman, reader in risk at University College London, said rising sea levels made it imperative that island states were supported in resilience building.
“We could have done much more to work with Vanuatu long before the cyclone struck in order to reduce the disaster potential. That is the point of this week’s disaster risk reduction conference in Japan. A cyclone alone does not create a disaster unless we are not ready for it,” he said.
Karl Mathiesen is a freelance journalist with a background in wildlife conservation.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS