Scientists say the devastation caused by Cyclone Pam, the most powerful cyclone to hit the South Pacific since records began, was aggravated by climate change. However, the effect the changing climate is having on tropical storms remains largely unresolved.
The president of Vanuatu on Monday told a conference in Japan that climate change had contributed to Pam’s impact on his nation. There are reports that 90 percent of the buildings in the capital Port Vila have been destroyed or damaged after the cyclone hit over the weekend. Six people are reported to have been killed.
Vanuatuan President Baldwin Lonsdale told delegates at a UN conference on disaster risk his people were being affected by more cyclones. He said this was a symptom of the climate crisis.
“We see the level of sea rise… The cyclone seasons, the warm, the rain, all this is affected... This year we have more than in any year… Yes, climate change is contributing to this.”
THERMODYNAMICS
Richard Betts, head of climate impacts research at the UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre, said the human contribution to sea level rise over the past 100 years was well documented and makes island nations more vulnerable to storms and particularly storm surge.
“When cyclones and other storms occur, there is already a greater risk of coastal flooding because the background sea level has risen, largely due to human-induced global warming. How much more flooding has occurred due to human action is unclear, but ongoing sea level rise can be expected to further increase this risk unless coastal protection can be improved,” he said.
University of Oxford climate scientist Myles Allen said while there is a suggestion cyclones may become more intense, the president’s assertion that climate change was causing more storms was not supported by science.
“It is a perfectly reasonable question for the president to be raising. Basic thermodynamics means that a warmer atmosphere, all other things being equal, makes more intense cyclones possible,” Allen said.
“But this does not mean cyclones have necessarily become more likely: Indeed, the latest assessment of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated explicitly that there is no clear evidence at present for any human-induced increase in tropic-wide cyclone frequency,” he said.
“On a personal level, I sympathize with the president’s evident frustration: He and the people of Vanuatu deserve an authoritative answer to the question of the role of past greenhouse gas emissions in Cyclone Pam. The science isn’t there yet, but we are getting there,” Allen said.
ACTIVE YEAR
By March it would be normal for around four cyclones to have formed in the South Pacific. However, as Lonsdale said on Monday, this year’s season has been particularly bad. Six cyclones have hit the region since the beginning of the year.
Reading University tropical meteorologist Pete Innes said it was impossible make any inference from a single season.
“It is a very active year, but a single active year doesn’t in itself indicate a trend. There isn’t apparently a long term trend,” he said.
Modelling expects cyclones in the South Pacific to shift southward and become 20 to 30 percent less frequent by the end of the century as a result of climate change, he said.
“The things that control the number of cyclones are other things like the wind speeds at different levels in the atmosphere,” he said. “There’s really complicated changes projected to happen to the winds speeds in [the South Pacific], which, in concert to the changes in sea temperature, actually seem to indicate that we would expect fewer cyclones in this area in the next 50 to 100 years.”
RESILIENCE BUILDING
Chris Holloway, a tropical storm expert at the University of Reading, said that while the total number of storms may reduce, the number of very intense storms, like Pam, may increase slightly.
“Tropical Cyclone Pam had the strongest winds of any South Pacific tropical cyclone on record, and is tied for having the strongest winds of any southern hemisphere tropical cyclone on record,” he said.
“Globally it is most likely that the total number of tropical cyclones will decrease with climate change while the number of the most intense storms, like Pam, will increase,” he said.
Ilan Kelman, reader in risk at University College London, said rising sea levels made it imperative that island states were supported in resilience building.
“We could have done much more to work with Vanuatu long before the cyclone struck in order to reduce the disaster potential. That is the point of this week’s disaster risk reduction conference in Japan. A cyclone alone does not create a disaster unless we are not ready for it,” he said.
Karl Mathiesen is a freelance journalist with a background in wildlife conservation.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS