Exploiting foreign workers
The greed of many Taiwanese involved in brokerage firms handling foreign laborers is truly sickening. Fees of up to NT$220,000 for the right to work long hours at ludicrously low salaries with minimal government protection? It adds up to hundreds of millions of NT dollars stolen from desperate workers who are trying to feed their families back home.
For processing a few papers, these firms charge exorbitant fees, which foreign laborers must work years for to pay. This means that most workers earn nothing for at least two years, despite working full time. Taiwanese should be ashamed.
One wonders if the government is in collusion with these brokerage firms. Why else would a democratic government allow such shameless exploitation of these workers?
Why are there no charitable organizations offering the same service at a small fraction of the current fees? Indonesia decided to stop sending so many healthcare workers, but instead of addressing the key issues, Taiwan is simply turning to Myanmar for more workers. Unbridled greed is evident in the vultures feeding on human misery, raking in millions of NT dollars from helpless workers.
What is next? Offering employment to the hungry in exchange for food alone? Demanding a kidney? Hopefully, Myanmar will also wake up and leave Taiwan’s caregiver workforce to collapse without any foreign laborers.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
Marriage not a public issue
The debate over same-sex marriage caught national media attention with large protests in Taipei both for and against the issue.
Talk of Taiwan becoming the first Asian nation to grant marriage equality for members of the LGBT community brought the conversation to kitchen tables and tea shops across the nation.
Most asked if Taiwanese could accept same-sex marriage, but it should not matter what public opinion is.
Marriage is not a public decision. The public at large has no right to insert itself into private relationship decisions. What does that mean? It means the public cannot interfere with marriage.
If the bride and groom are unemployed, uneducated and living on government assistance, they can marry.
If the husband or wife is a convicted, violent felon, they can get married.
If both the potential bride and groom have previously married and divorced a half-dozen times, they can get married.
If one or both partners is incapable of having children, they can get married.
If both can clearly consent, they can marry.
The public’s opinion on the likely success of a marriage and how that union might affect society are not factors that are considered when people marry.
So, why do people feel that religious inclinations, societal apprehensions or personal discomfort should create any impediment to another person’s freedom to live and love as their conscience and heart implores them?
What kind of over-entitled mode of thinking would prevent another person from making a meaningful life commitment because it makes them feel uncomfortable?
There is too much pain, sadness and fear in this world to add more by denying people their heart’s desire.
Also, are we not all just too damn busy to meddle in the private lives of our neighbors and countrymen and women?
Aaron Andrews
Taichung
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS