Exploiting foreign workers
The greed of many Taiwanese involved in brokerage firms handling foreign laborers is truly sickening. Fees of up to NT$220,000 for the right to work long hours at ludicrously low salaries with minimal government protection? It adds up to hundreds of millions of NT dollars stolen from desperate workers who are trying to feed their families back home.
For processing a few papers, these firms charge exorbitant fees, which foreign laborers must work years for to pay. This means that most workers earn nothing for at least two years, despite working full time. Taiwanese should be ashamed.
One wonders if the government is in collusion with these brokerage firms. Why else would a democratic government allow such shameless exploitation of these workers?
Why are there no charitable organizations offering the same service at a small fraction of the current fees? Indonesia decided to stop sending so many healthcare workers, but instead of addressing the key issues, Taiwan is simply turning to Myanmar for more workers. Unbridled greed is evident in the vultures feeding on human misery, raking in millions of NT dollars from helpless workers.
What is next? Offering employment to the hungry in exchange for food alone? Demanding a kidney? Hopefully, Myanmar will also wake up and leave Taiwan’s caregiver workforce to collapse without any foreign laborers.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
Marriage not a public issue
The debate over same-sex marriage caught national media attention with large protests in Taipei both for and against the issue.
Talk of Taiwan becoming the first Asian nation to grant marriage equality for members of the LGBT community brought the conversation to kitchen tables and tea shops across the nation.
Most asked if Taiwanese could accept same-sex marriage, but it should not matter what public opinion is.
Marriage is not a public decision. The public at large has no right to insert itself into private relationship decisions. What does that mean? It means the public cannot interfere with marriage.
If the bride and groom are unemployed, uneducated and living on government assistance, they can marry.
If the husband or wife is a convicted, violent felon, they can get married.
If both the potential bride and groom have previously married and divorced a half-dozen times, they can get married.
If one or both partners is incapable of having children, they can get married.
If both can clearly consent, they can marry.
The public’s opinion on the likely success of a marriage and how that union might affect society are not factors that are considered when people marry.
So, why do people feel that religious inclinations, societal apprehensions or personal discomfort should create any impediment to another person’s freedom to live and love as their conscience and heart implores them?
What kind of over-entitled mode of thinking would prevent another person from making a meaningful life commitment because it makes them feel uncomfortable?
There is too much pain, sadness and fear in this world to add more by denying people their heart’s desire.
Also, are we not all just too damn busy to meddle in the private lives of our neighbors and countrymen and women?
Aaron Andrews
Taichung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS