The popularity of Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is worrying both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), and there are also rumors that opinions diverge on whether the presidential and legislative elections next year should be held on the same day.
Before the 2012 presidential election, many questioned the decision to move it forward to coincide with the legislative election. If DPP Chairperson and presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had won, there would have been a four-month “window period,” during which President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would have been a lame-duck president.
A president who loses all hope of being sheltered by their party after stepping down, when their successor is from a rival party, will usually do anything to protect themselves before leaving office. Ma might sign presidential orders to cover his close aids, sell out the nation’s interests or start up the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). In other words, the scary thing is that he might be ready to risk anything.
Some say such a problem can be prevented, but they are dreaming. Until Ma steps down on May 20 next year, he is the incumbent president, protected by Article 52 of the Constitution, which states that “the President shall not, without having been recalled, or having been relieved of his functions, be liable to criminal prosecution unless he is charged with having committed an act of rebellion or treason.” Can people demand that he do nothing during those four months if the KMT loses the presidential election? This is impossible, because this would be unconstitutional and illegal.
Last month, the Central Election Commission said that almost 70 percent of the public were in favor of combining the two elections. The question is: Did the commission also inform them about the four-month window period, which could have unpredictable consequences? Moreover, the commission conducted the survey soon after Ko’s victory in last year’s nine-in-one elections. Why is it conducting a survey on voters’ preference for combining the two elections? It is trying to mislead voters?
This kind of handover from one president to another can lead to problems like those previously seen in the US. At the time, Washington handled such problems resolutely by passing the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1933 to move the inauguration day of the president and vice president forward from March to January. It was a resolute move because the amendment would cut the incumbent president’s term by almost two months.
The commission is an independent government agency. Although most parties fight selfishly for their own gains, commission members should act out of concern for the nation and all future generations. If both the agency and the two major parties suddenly think that it is necessary to combine the two elections, they could just go ahead and do so, and then wait for voters’ final verdict. Otherwise they could learn from the US and shorten Ma’s term by promptly passing a legislative proposal for a constitutional amendment this year, so voters can vote on the proposal in a referendum held on the same day as the two elections. By cutting Ma’s term by several months, they would be able to resolve a national crisis.
If they think this is inappropriate, they could separate the presidential and legislative elections and postpone the former to late April next year. This would seem to be an easier and more humanistic way of dealing with the issue rather than passing a constitutional amendment.
Christian Fan Jiang is deputy convener of the Northern Taiwan Society’s legal and political group.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,