The storm of controversy surrounding the Taipei Dome project continues to spread, with public opinion, the media and social networking sites unanimously calling it a scandal.
The public has finally woken up to the fact that, from the very beginning, this was an illegal development project: a stitch-up between the government and the private sector, helped along the way by politicians. It is thus a great pity that during the course of the recent negotiations between the Taipei City Government and the contractor, Farglory Land Development Co, the issue of tree protection was pushed to one side.
In support of the Songshan Tree Protection Volunteer Union, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said: “If there is no need to move the trees, why is a set of standard operating procedures required to rationalize it?”
This is about values, and is not something that can be substituted with engineering solutions, he said. “If we don’t allow trees to be trees, how can we call ourselves a civilized city?”
By early 2008, information about irregularities in connection with the Taipei Dome project had already been submitted to then-Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), and in the following year, the Control Yuan issued a correction. However, within the context of repeated contract violations by Farglory, Hau chose to turn a blind eye.
On top of this, a large number of the officials protecting the company within Taipei City Government were up to their necks in work shielding the firm — the reason for the present calamitous state of affairs. With the project now seriously delayed, Farglory has again violated the terms of its contract. How should Ko react?
The Taipei City government’s recent approach in dealing with the Taipei Dome project and related build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects has been to pursue financial penalties and exercise contractual rights to fight for so-called “citizen’s rights,” while neglecting the more fundamental issue of the public interest.
Built in the wrong location, once in operation the Taipei Dome will greatly affect traffic, the environment and public safety. For example, due to the public-private collaborative structure of the project, there has been an explosion in commercial facilities occupying areas originally designated as emergency dispersal points.
Furthermore, the commercial aspect of the development dwarfs the sporting side, in contravention of the area’s designation as a cultural and recreational zone within the Taipei municipal strategic plan. Demanding financial penalties and exercising contractual rights cannot replace these vital areas of public interest.
The tender process for the Taipei Dome project contained a hidden upper limit for modified information, which violates regulations of the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法) and the Promotion of Private Participation in Construction Projects Act (促進民間參與公共建設法). At the end of last year, it was confirmed that Farglory had violated the contract.
The 2017 Universiade organizing committee then publicly made it known that the existing Taipei Gymnasium could be used as a substitute for the opening and closing ceremonies, and that everything was in place except for one last crucial element.
Hopefully Ko will avoid following in the footsteps of his predecessor, Hau, and instead refuse to continue to safeguard the private interests of Farglory.
Ko should imitate the action of the tiger, stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, tear up the BOT contract and tear down that egg-shaped monstrosity.
Arthur Yo is director of policy at the Songshan Tree Protection Volunteer Union.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
The Russian city of Vladivostok lies approximately 45km from the Sino-Russian border on the Sea of Japan. The area was not always Russian territory: It was once the site of a Chinese settlement. The settlement would later be known as Yongmingcheng (永明城), the “city of eternal light,” during the Yuan Dynasty. That light was extinguished in 1858 when a large area of land was ceded by the Qing Dynasty to the Russian Empire with the signing of the Treaty of Aigun. The People’s Republic of China founded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has never ruled Taiwan. Taiwan was governed by the
RSS