A new minister of national defense was sworn in yesterday morning, just hours after another Cabinet member announced his departure and two days after a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker said she was leaving the party because Taiwan needs more than just a choice between pan-blue and pan-green.
Are these moves another example of musical chairs at the Executive Yuan and within the KMT, or a hint that something different is on the way?
Former chief of general staff Admiral Kao Kuang-chi (高廣圻) replaced Yen Ming (嚴明), who resigned on Tuesday last week, reportedly because he felt he had “completed his mission” and wanted to pave the way for younger leadership.
On Thursday night, National Development Council Minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) said that he had first handed in his resignation after the nine-in-one elections in November last year, but had agreed to the premier’s request to stay on — but it was time to go now because he too had completed his mission. However, Kuan also said that the elections had shown that a majority of voters were unhappy with the current political and economic situation.
Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩) from Hsinchu County said she wanted to have a voice in politics that differs from those of the two major parties.
The idea of completed missions, ministerial movements and new voices come amid a growing clamor for change in another key KMT institution, the National Policy Foundation, with even such a pan-blue stalwart as the United Daily News venturing in an editorial yesterday that it was time for the think tank “heavyweights” to step down to allow younger people to promote reforms in the party.
These calls for younger leadership might make bystanders think that perhaps the winds of change are beginning to be felt in the corridors of the KMT’s relic-laden headquarters on Taipei’s Bade Road.
However, more cynical observers might note that the corridors in the Bade building are nowhere near as drafty as those of the KMT’s former home, the imposing edifice it built on Zhongshang S Road directly across the Presidential Office Building — back in the days when it looked like the party would rule Taiwan forever. Between the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, many of the building’s offices became vacant and in 2006, the KMT sold the building to the Evergreen Group in what had to be a humbling step down and moved to a much smaller building on Bade Road.
The party’s new chairman, New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫), has been talking a lot about reform since he emerged as the sole candidate to replace President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) at the helm, but history has shown that one disastrous election result does not mean true change will occur within the KMT.
Licking its self-imposed wounds after losing the 2000 presidential election to the Democratic Progressive Party’s Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the KMT turned to former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), who had just been rejected by voters, choosing to do away with the reforms begun when former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was running both the nation and the party.
Under Lien, the KMT rejected Lee’s efforts to mainstream a more Taiwanese element into the party, as opposed to the old Mainlander guard. While the party was eventually able to regain power with Ma as a candidate in 2008, his pledges of reform never really took hold within the party or in government.
Just how far removed the Ma administration has become from the average Taiwanese was amply demonstrated last year, with the widespread public support for the Sunflower movement and then the November elections. Chu and others say they all want to see the KMT change, to better reflect the needs and aspirations of both its supporters and all Taiwanese. It will take a lot more than words — and neither history, nor time, appears to be on their side.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS