Welsh milk might seem an unlikely export to a burgeoning Chinese consumer class better known for its appetite for Burberry coats and Range Rovers, but Laurence Harris has dispatched six shipping containers full of his organic dairy products to China in the past eight weeks.
“It’s quite exciting for a small company in west Wales,” he says. “Milk in general is treated as a health drink in China.”
His company, Daioni, has been supplying Pret a Manger outlets in Hong Kong — and has seen little evidence of the slowdown in Chinese growth that has started to show up in official statistics.
“The figures are frightening: the development in China is immense, regardless of what they say. It’s just huge — and very exciting,” he said, adding that having a son who lived in Hong Kong has helped him to understand the market better and that building up strong relationships had been key.
In general, British exporters have been relatively late to the China party. After more than a decade of rampant growth in the vast Asian economy, and with the enthusiastic support of government ministers, who have traveled to China on a seemingly endless round of trade missions, it scored as Britain’s sixth biggest market in November, worth ￡1.4 billion (US$2.12 billion) — narrowly edging out Belgium and Luxembourg.
However, as the Chinese economy shifts down a gear, in a deliberate attempt by policymakers to achieve a more sustainable growth model, there are fears some firms could get their fingers burnt. There is already evidence of waning demand as well as belt-tightening amid a crackdown by Beijing on ostentatious spending.
Last week, London-listed brewer SABMiller was the latest company to bemoan “difficult trading conditions” in China.
The company behind Peroni and Grolsch said poor summer weather was to blame, but analysts also pointed to the economic slowdown, as sales volumes in China fell 9 percent in the latest quarter and by double digits in some parts of the nation.
Consumer goods multinational Unilever, which makes Dove soap, Ben & Jerry’s ice cream and Persil, also recently reported a 20 percent drop in sales in China in the fourth quarter.
At the other end of the consumer market, exports of British powerboats to China — a symbol of the UK’s reputation for producing high quality, luxury products — have also been under pressure.
Sales to China from the UK’s marine industry, which includes boatbuilders as well as equipment and parts makers, have halved since 2012. In the year to April last year, sales were ￡34 million, down sharply from ￡52 million a year earlier and ￡71 million the year before that. That reflects a wider pattern for the UK industry of falling exports but rising domestic demand, which for last year left total sales up just 1 percent at ￡2.9 billion.
Part of the drop in Chinese trade was down to the volatile nature of powerboat sales, a big-ticket item which even the flashiest billionaires only tend to buy once in a while, British Marine Federation chief executive Howard Pridding said.
However, it also reflects a loss of momentum in the Chinese economy.
“Our leading boatbuilders have established a presence in China now and are building their brands, but the figures may demonstrate the initial market has been absorbed as well as reflecting the slowdown,” he said.
Rowan Crozier runs Birmingham-based Brandauer, which makes small metal parts (such as the electrical contacts in kettles) and sends 3 million parts a week to China.
He said he has not yet felt evidence of a slowdown, but sees uncertainty about the outlook for China.
“We are looking at a very strange economy globally at the moment: I can’t plan my business long term. I just have to be very lean, and flexible,” he said.
He said demand could fluctuate by 20 percent in either direction from one month to the next — unprecedented in his memory.
“It’s the whole world that’s doing that: we have to be more flexible about the way we hold stock, about the way we employ staff,” he said.
He said his approach to entering the Chinese market has been to piggyback on manufacturers who were already purchasers of Brandauer parts and subsequently moved their operations out to China.
Alucast chairman Tony Sartorius said part of the answer to the changeable climate for British firms is to make sure they are not too heavily dependent on demand in any single economy. For now, his aluminum die-casting business has not felt the slowdown.
Like many exporters, Alucast has spread itself across international markets. Overseas sales make up a quarter of annual turnover of ￡ 7 million and its parts for the automotive business and other industries are being shipped to countries including the US, Hungary and Romania as well as China.
“I only hear that China has slowed down. It’s still a massive market,” Sartorius said. “China is not a significant feature for us ... you don’t ever want to be in just one market.”
China-Britain Business Council director Fenella Barber said the policy change in Beijing should create opportunities in some sectors. The latest economic plan included a promise to boost the services sector, and creative industries, for example — areas in which Britain is strong.
“China seems very opaque, but it just has different ways of operating,” she said. “It’s all there in the five-year plan. So as a China-watcher, you can see the direction of travel.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS