There was uproar from all quarters following the Taipei City Government’s announcement that responsibility for the conservation of the city’s trees will be transferred from the Department of Cultural Affairs to the Public Works Department. However, the criticism should not be seen as a lack of trust in the officials of the Public Works Department to carry out their new role; rather it is a result of the conservation of trees not simply being a technical matter of trimming and transplantation.
Taipei’s Tree Conservation Act was conceived and brought about by former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) during her time as head of the Department of Cultural Affairs. The department’s remit broadly concerns conservation from the viewpoint of culture, landscape and ecology. Perhaps due to its work in the specific area of tree conservation, a number of development projects have suffered delay, though this will have been music to the ears of many conservation groups.
From tree conservation to neighborhood parks and entire garden cities, metropolitan ecological habitats raise a number of issues. Whether pastoral fields or inner-city gardens, in each case the answer is not to superficially engage in the planting of crops or plants, since this would simply be the shallow pursuit of a narrow utopian dream. One hopes that, during the course of industrialization and urbanization, the public will not sacrifice the rural environment on the altar of economic growth, but instead choose to preserve open stretches of countryside, where the water is clean and the air is pure — only then will Taiwan have achieved its vision of “ecological cities.”
Many mayors have expressed a wish to learn from — or even surpass — Singapore. Fifty years ago, founding father and former Singaporean president Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀) made the establishment of a “garden city” a national objective, hoping to change the appearance of the city-state and attract foreign investment. The second phase consisted of promoting green buildings and infrastructure; developing green spaces, public gardens, smaller neighborhood gardens and tree-lined boulevards; and even reservoirs, a green belt and a string of country parks.
Aside from their aesthetic appeal, these additional elements improved the “green lung” of the city. The planned third phase is to evolve Singapore into a “city within a garden,” thereby achieving Lee’s goal of a genuine garden city. Here, the term “garden” is not simply a description of ornamental green gardens, it also represents nature throughout the city.
Third-generation garden and green space design involves the fusion of ecological habitats and the restoration of multiple “life support systems.” It examines areas such as whether a city’s drainage system can incorporate a wildlife corridor and the adaption of traffic safety islands into mini-rainwater gardens to construct a citywide, landscaped pedestrian network.
As for the present talk of garden cities and tree conservation in Taiwan, if it turns out to be simply a papering over of the cracks without a set of clear and transparent green policies and organizational structures, blame will undoubtedly lie at the feet of the national parks administration and the Tourism Bureau. And yet, New York, Tokyo, Beijing, Paris — even Jakarta — all have a “city parks office” or “city gardens agency” or “parks and recreation office” that are able to conserve and use the resources of their parks and green spaces at a macro level.
To this day, Taiwan’s cities and counties lack a single organizational body responsible for parks and green spaces. Until the central government creates such a body, each local administration should take the initiative and forge ahead together, so it is good to support Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲 ) green policy.
After all, there is much Taipei can achieve if every public garden, green space, tree-lined street and ancient tree — even community farms and rooftop gardens — can, under the jurisdiction of a citywide ecological system, use safe layouts and be responsive to the nation’s aging society.
If Ko’s administration could do this, and also implement policy guidance and provide technical advice to assist non-governmental organizations and increase the responsibility of neighborhood and district leaders for the management of the ecological environment and social welfare, then Taipei can truly become a leader in green-city policy.
Monica Kuo is the chair of the Department of Landscape Architecture at Chinese Culture University.
Translated by Edward Jones
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS