Next month’s nine-in-one election results are anyone’s guess, but political circles in Taipei are already embroiled in a battle over the premiership.
The cause of this battle is the ongoing food security issues, which have caused great public alarm.
Although the government has said it will handle the situation, it is yet to show how. The tainted cooking oil scandal is spreading like a disease, from Ting Hsin International Group (頂新集團) to Namchow Group (南僑集團), as problems have been found with lard, tallow and vegetable oil products.
From the processing plants, the affected products have reached bakeries, buffet restaurants and roadside stalls, affecting almost everyone. Food safety has become a universal concern, but the government seems incapable of solving the problem and instead repeatedly implies that there are solutions in the pipeline.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said in a legislative interpellation session two weeks ago that no problems had been found with Ting Hsin cooking oils and that they were fit for human consumption. Less than two weeks later, it was revealed that Ting Hsin mixed oil for industrial use and animal feed with cooking oil, throwing the nation into a state of fright. It would not be asking too much for the premier step down to take responsibility.
A recent survey released by Taiwan Indicator Survey Research showed that Jiang has a 66 percent disapproval rating for his performance as premier, while a mere 15.6 percent said he is doing a good job. This is a record disapproval rating, worse than those of former premiers Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄), at 65 percent, and Sean Chen (陳沖), at 59 percent.
The result is causing problems for the Cabinet’s policy implementation, and Jiang’s worst-case scenario would see him become targeted by opposition attacks and step down to take responsibility for a poor election-season performance.
It is not only the opposition that is putting pressure on Jiang to step down: Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are also outspoken on the issue, with Legislator Tsai Chin-lung (蔡錦隆) saying food safety is a fundamental public demand and “if this is not handled properly, the premier must step down.”
KMT Legislator Lu Chia-chen (盧嘉辰) has said that “if there are any more slip-ups, stepping down is the only choice.”
These statements were followed by allegations that Namchow added industrial oil to its cooking oil.
Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is vigorously backing Jiang and — at a ceremony handing over the reins of the party’s legislative caucus to new officials on Wednesday — called on KMT legislators to support the Cabinet, public discontent is soaring, forcing KMT lawmakers to prioritize public opinion.
Furthermore, the run-up to the elections is a sensitive time, and as new food-security scandals are revealed, KMT candidates sense the public discontent and feel that a Cabinet reshuffle cannot wait until after the elections, because if it is not done now, they might go down with a sinking ship.
This is why KMT Taipei mayoral hopeful Sean Lien (連勝文) said that if he were the premier, he would step down, while his campaign director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) made a direct call for Jiang to step down.
There are also whispers in Taipei political circles that if Jiang steps down, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a food sanitation specialist, would take over.
The battle within the KMT over the premier’s seat has begun.
Given the situation, it would not be excessive if Jiang stepped down. In fact, the sooner he does, the better. If the move were to be postponed until after next month’s elections, public worries would grow and the KMT would have to pay an even greater price.
Even clumsy communicators occasionally say something worth hearing. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, for example. He has of late been accused of muddling his messages in support of Ukraine and much else. However, if you pay attention, he is actually trying to achieve something huge: a global — rather than “Western” — alliance of democracies against autocracies such as Russia and China. By accepting that mission, he has in effect taken the baton from US President Joe Biden, who hosted a rather underwhelming “summit for democracy” in December. That was before Russia’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine, when rallying the freedom-loving nations
Ideas matter. They especially matter in world affairs. And in communist countries, it is communist ideas, not supreme leaders’ personality traits, that matter most. That is the reality in the People’s Republic of China. All Chinese communist leaders — from Mao Zedong (毛澤東) through Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), from Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) through to Xi Jinping (習近平) — have always held two key ideas to be sacred and self-evident: first, that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is infallible, and second, that the Marxist-Leninist socialist system of governance is superior to every alternative. The ideological consistency by all CCP leaders,
In the past 30 years, globalization has given way to an international division of labor, with developing countries focusing on export manufacturing, while developed countries in Europe and the US concentrate on internationalizing service industries to drive economic growth. The competitive advantages of these countries can readily be seen in the global financial market. For example, Taiwan has attracted a lot of global interest with its technology industry. The US is the home of leading digital service companies, such as Meta Platforms (Facebook), Alphabet (Google) and Microsoft. The country holds a virtual oligopoly of the global market for consumer digital
Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) on Saturday expounded on her concept of replacing “unification” with China with “integration.” Lu does not she think the idea would be welcomed in its current form; rather, she wants to elicit discussion on a third way to break the current unification/independence impasse, especially given heightened concerns over China attacking Taiwan in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. She has apparently formulated her ideas around the number “three.” First, she envisions cross-strait relations developing in three stages: having Beijing lay to rest the idea of unification of “one China” (一個中國); next replacing this with
RSS