Independent Taipei mayoral hopeful Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) recent proposal for an “opposition alliance” to be formed ahead of the upcoming Taipei mayoral elections of course refers to a union between opposition parties — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the New Party and the Green Party — which are, individually, all smaller than the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
However, the Taipei mayoral election is only a local election and Ko is not a member of the DPP.
Why, then, is it necessary to rally all the smaller parties for an election unrelated to party politics or issues of national identity? Apart from highlighting the clear focus on winning above all else, this also shows many of the problems implicit in Taiwan’s elections
In London in the late 1970s, as the economy was reeling from the effects of the 1979 oil crisis, the public, struggling to make ends meet, started to lose confidence in political parties.
The Labour Party, seeing an opportunity, proposed forming an alliance, too, only in this case it was not an alliance of small political parties, but of trade unions and labor groups: In other words, an alliance of civic society.
Their goal was to try and get people who felt apathetic toward mainstream party politics and elections engaged once again.
This alliance involved a change of policy orientation, with plans for the city different to those of the Conservative Party. The Conservatives had had grand ambitions for the creation of a financial district, embarking on the construction of Canary Wharf, somewhat similar to Taipei’s Xinyi district.
Investment and the number of companies interested in moving into the district, however, fell short of expectations after the construction was completed, and the London Docklands area, for a time, resembled a ghost town.
The Labour Party resolved to save the city from the flawed and failing urban planning policy and proposed more socially-oriented policies. For instance, due to the correlation of an economic recession and an increase in unemployment, domestic abuse was on the rise, and a Labour mayoral candidate proposed building large numbers of women’s shelters, refuges for the victims of domestic violence, an idea that was warmly received by women in the electorate.
The Labour candidate won and the Greater London Council passed a special budget which saw more than 200 refuges built, putting gender equality right at the center of city policy. Labour then promoted an alliance of grass-roots candidates from the actual communities in which they were standing for election, and this had a great effect on lifting London out of economic recession.
Compared with the lofty goals of establishing a civil alliance and turning London into a modern city, Ko’s call for an opposition alliance, which basically amounts to the leaders of political parties joining forces to improve their chances of winning, is much less ambitious.
Ko is a relative newcomer to politics, he has much more potential than established politicians for coming up with creative policy ideas for the city and doing something genuinely new to transcend pan-green or pan-blue partisanship, a problem he has often spoken about.
Taipei’s voters are among the most savvy in the country, with approximately 1 million swing voters unfettered by loyalties to any particular party. Any candidate with promising policies has a good chance of emerging the winner.
Sabina Sun is a social commentator and a doctorate candidate in the Department of Urban Planning at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS