Not so long ago, a third-party investment manager handling government funds caused heavy losses for Taiwan’s Labor Pension and Labor Insurance funds. Now another market trader is suspected of speculating on shares with board members of an over-the-counter listed company, causing the pension fund to lose more than NT$60 million (US$2 million).
Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和) has suggested setting up a “Taiwan sovereign fund,” but nothing more has been done about it. If fund managers are inexpert and third-party traders keep mishandling the funds, establishing a sovereign fund could be a solution, since it could kill two birds with one stone by averting rogue trading and improving investment performance.
Sovereign funds are wealth funds that are owned, controlled and budgeted for by governments. They seek to maximize return on investment following risk adjustment and are managed by specialist investment bodies independent of the central bank and finance ministry.
Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global is recognized worldwide as the best-governed sovereign wealth fund. Some aspects of the Norwegian fund’s operations would be worthy references in planning for a future sovereign wealth fund for Taiwan.
First, the purpose of the fund is to provide welfare for the nation’s citizens and its basic strategy is clear. In principle, the fund’s overseas investments have no political strategic purpose and it does not gain controlling interests in the companies in which it invests. It is also stipulated that the fund may not invest in companies that act immorally, violate human rights, are involved in major corruption or badly damage the environment. The fund is not allowed to manipulate the market share price of single companies, or to hold more than 3 percent of the total shares of any one company.
Second, the Norwegian fund has established commercial, professional and independent operating principles. Its internal organizational structure, mode of governance and management team are like those of a world-class private investment firm, rather than a government administration department.
The fund enlists first-rate financial talent from around the world. Its chief investment officer and fund mangers are all externally recruited professionals. The makeup of its investment portfolio is made public periodically, as is the rate of return on its investments, and its asset flows are all listed on its Web site. This makes it much more transparent than other sovereign wealth funds.
Another notable feature is the fund’s ethical council, with a broad-based membership, including not just economists, but also philosophers, human-rights lawyers, product safety experts and experts in international law.
It must be admitted that many difficulties stand in the way of setting up a Taiwan sovereign fund.
First, existing funds are based on different laws. They serve specific groups of people, have differing regulations about charges and are answerable to different government departments. These factors will make integrating all these funds a complicated task.
Second, it will take a long time to draw up all the necessary legal amendments and new legislation.
Third, it will not be easy to find highly qualified personnel and set up an independent body or company to manage the fund’s investments, without over-concentration of power, and to make the fund’s operations completely transparent and free of political interference.
Setting up a Taiwan sovereign fund is achievable, and the successful experiences of other countries are available for reference. It can be done if the government is diligent in its planning so that the obstacles can be overcome.
Lee Wo-chiang is a professor in the Department of Banking and Finance at Tamkang University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS