When Beijing, at a UN tribunal over tensions concerning sovereignty in the South China Sea, included Taiwan and Penghu as part of its territorial claims, nobody in the government reacted or uttered a single word in response. When pressed about this by the media, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) merely said: “We protested this 55 years ago.”
However, 55 years ago, the Republic of China had a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, as the sole representative of China, and the People’s Republic of China did not have a seat. Back then, nobody listened to what China had to say. Today, the situation is reversed: Now, everybody listens when China speaks, while Taiwan has no voice.
Recently, China has been flexing its muscles wherever it sees fit. It has challenged Japan on sovereignty claims in the East China Sea, and it has tried to expand its claims in the South China Sea, using tactics designed to intimidate such countries as Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, showing them that a new bully is on the block, while insisting it is all part of its “peaceful rise.”
While exploiting the tensions in the South China Sea with a sleight of hand, it has slipped in a claim to Taiwan and the Penghu Islands as part of its ambition to annex Taiwan, and all the ministry can do is say, “Oh, we dealt with all this 55 years ago.” It is no wonder that Taiwan is less and less visible on the international stage.
The government boasts that Taiwan has visa waiver agreements with 130 countries, but for the most part this is a result of Taiwan putting aside certain passport requirements in compliance with the visa waiver agreements, and the courtesy of having a visa waiver program with Taiwan is a far cry from recognizing its sovereignty.
The government is so proud of its “diplomatic truce” with China and that it has not suspended diplomatic ties with any country in the time it has been in power, yet Sao Tomean President Manuel Pinto da Costa recently visited Shanghai and Beijing, which was hugely embarrassing for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. Many of Taiwan’s allies are casting coy glances at China, and unless Beijing is concerned that pursuing closer ties with them would damage diplomatic relations with Taiwan, the situation could well escalate.
China boasts military might and prodigious economic clout, but Taiwan is still an economic force to be reckoned with in the global economy, and its commitment to democracy and human rights and its development model have all won it plaudits from the international community, despite the political infighting that still exists.
However, when Beijing violates the principle of “shelving controversies and pursuing a win-win solution” (擱置爭議、共創雙贏), which we are supposed to be following, the government here just feigns ignorance.
Also, when the media asks what China is trying to do during this UN tribunal, the ministry only offers a 10-character declaration — not one character critical of China — merely reiterating its stance of more than half a century ago.
When the ministry treats this serious slight to our sovereignty as a domestic issue, the thing that grates most is not the precarious international situation in which Taiwan finds itself, but rather that our government is reluctant to speak up and fight in our corner.
The controversy over the sovereignty issue has raged for decades and forgetting for a moment that the majority of countries and international organizations do not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign nation, ordinary Taiwanese, in all manner of forums and in any way they can, still insist on flying our national flag, letting the world know that Taiwan still exists. Why, then, can the ministry not tell the world, at every opportunity it has, that Taiwan is a sovereign nation, and its sovereignty belongs to us — nobody else?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS