You can’t teach an old dog new tricks, or so the old saw goes. First coined in Medieval England, it fits present-day Taiwan and the perverse world of Taiwanese politics beautifully.
There is a clique of individuals in the nation, the “republican” old dogs, who have monopolized a routine of old tricks and continue to perform them for their own edification and self-justification.
The student-led Sunflower movement has no need to bandy around claims of representing anything new.
It is a genuinely new voice in the politics of the nation, a fresh bloom of new ideas with a new name, new demands, new ways to mobilize people, new leaders, and a new, entirely Taiwanese way of looking at the world.
All in all, it was responsible for the creation of a new page in the history of politics and social movements in Taiwan.
The imaginary edifice of the aforementioned reactionary old faction was torn down by the “communist bandit” Mao Zedong (毛澤東) back in 1949.
This group, however, refuse to let go of the past and insist on proclaiming a “new” May 4th Movement, distancing themselves from the Sunflower movement.
This gang are anti-democratic, referring to themselves with names such as the New Revolutionary Alliance (NRA, 新同盟會) — after Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) Tongmenghui alliance for democracy, which was the precursor of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) founded in 1905 — and the New Party and welcome with open arms their vision of a “new China” which would swallow up the present- day Taiwan.
The founding of the original May 4th Movement, opposed to the influence of foreign powers and powerful northern warlords and rejecting traditional Chinese feudal society, was a momentous revolutionary event in modern Chinese history, but it had precious little to do with Taiwan, which at the time was under Japanese rule.
Nevertheless, the Sunflower Movement, with its resistance to a “foreign” regime and its protest against a state prepared to do violence against its citizens, better represented the spirit of the original May 4th Movement, than the so-called New May 4th Movement did.
Now that Taiwan is in a modern, democratic era, this clique has commandeered the name of the association started by Sun — whom the Qing rulers had known as one of the Four Outlaws (四大寇) — establishing the NRA. The New Party is stuck in even more of a disconnected time warp. The old guard in the NRA and the New Party are little more than a reaction to the localization of the KMT and the Republic of China (ROC).
After President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) regained power for the KMT regime, this cabal — regardless of their desires to be seen as an entirely new entity — welcomed the “new China.”
Seeing the writing on the wall, having kept themselves in power for all this time in the name of the ROC, they are now starting to come clean, or making sure that their pensions are intact.
This bunch call the old new, but do not dare countenance anything new. When Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) went to Nanjing to represent the government, he heaped praise on the “outlaw” Sun. He also talked of the ROC and how it had existed for 103 years, not daring to admit that the original ROC had died a death at 38 years old, and now continues as the zombie usurper of a new land.
This zombie regime and the old guard, unwilling to let go of the past, are living off the nation as parasites, having grafted themselves onto a new host, claiming themselves to represent a new entity, as if this justifies their continued existence.
However, they stop short of proclaiming a “new ROC,” or identifing themselves as “New Taiwanese.”
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS