You cannot eat soil, but you can plant crops in it. Using the same logic as Hon Hai Technology Group chairman Terry Gou’s (郭台銘) comment that “Democracy makes no pottage,” the statement that follows should be “but it helps develop the economy.”
Democratic reform does not restrict the economy; it helps economic growth because democracy complies with the rules for a free market. Democratic reform benefits economic development.
The study of political economy does not only confirm the benefits of democracy to a thriving economy, it also says that economic development is beneficial to democracy.
These conclusions have been confirmed through empirical observations.
Political democracy supports transparency and stability in the commercial order and, most importantly, reduces government intervention and guarantees fair competition — the most important components of market economies.
In the planned economies of authoritarian states, the authoritarian government becomes the biggest chief executive in the market, with the power to decide the state of the market — from selecting which products should be produced to supply and demand and which companies should be closed or allowed to remain in business.
All this works against a thriving economy, mainly because people are not free and their only purpose is to support the state and be loyal to the national leader. Both daily needs and their way of life are determined by the government. In authoritarian systems, the public has no needs that the government needs to respect, businesses do not have to prosper and therefore, GDP does not grow.
The growth of China, Vietnam and other booming economies is slowing; political reform will be critical to how they perform next.
Issues like the protection of human rights and the environment, and worries about housing, education, healthcare and income distribution, among others, are difficult strategic challenges that will determine their economic development.
In the global trend toward economic transformation, democratic freedom is the most important driver of growth.
The UN has predicted that industrial structures may be reorganized over the next 30 years, placing the information and service industries at the center of global output.
At the same time, the next industrial revolution will see robots take over the manufacturing industry within 10 years.
Finally, the information industry will be disrupted, with big data alongside cloud technology directing services. These trends require data and creative individuals.
However, creative individuals develop in democracies, which provide the political environment required for the cultural diversity, tolerance and freedom of expression that nurture them.
This nation’s problem grows from the struggles of the manufacturing industry during its economic-structural transformation.
What differs from the global situation is that Taiwanese industry continues to emphasize technological and other hardware-related trends, while international enterprises include population and humanities experts who deal with global demographic structures and diverse national cultures to create new products with their technical departments.
Taiwan is used to a manufacturing industry focused on hardware, but the key to meeting the future lies in creativity, design and application.
Democracy is the strongest future economic driver, because only in an open political system will the economy be able to realize its greatest potential.
Su Tzu-yun is president of the Center for Advanced Technology at Tamkang University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS