You cannot eat soil, but you can plant crops in it. Using the same logic as Hon Hai Technology Group chairman Terry Gou’s (郭台銘) comment that “Democracy makes no pottage,” the statement that follows should be “but it helps develop the economy.”
Democratic reform does not restrict the economy; it helps economic growth because democracy complies with the rules for a free market. Democratic reform benefits economic development.
The study of political economy does not only confirm the benefits of democracy to a thriving economy, it also says that economic development is beneficial to democracy.
These conclusions have been confirmed through empirical observations.
Political democracy supports transparency and stability in the commercial order and, most importantly, reduces government intervention and guarantees fair competition — the most important components of market economies.
In the planned economies of authoritarian states, the authoritarian government becomes the biggest chief executive in the market, with the power to decide the state of the market — from selecting which products should be produced to supply and demand and which companies should be closed or allowed to remain in business.
All this works against a thriving economy, mainly because people are not free and their only purpose is to support the state and be loyal to the national leader. Both daily needs and their way of life are determined by the government. In authoritarian systems, the public has no needs that the government needs to respect, businesses do not have to prosper and therefore, GDP does not grow.
The growth of China, Vietnam and other booming economies is slowing; political reform will be critical to how they perform next.
Issues like the protection of human rights and the environment, and worries about housing, education, healthcare and income distribution, among others, are difficult strategic challenges that will determine their economic development.
In the global trend toward economic transformation, democratic freedom is the most important driver of growth.
The UN has predicted that industrial structures may be reorganized over the next 30 years, placing the information and service industries at the center of global output.
At the same time, the next industrial revolution will see robots take over the manufacturing industry within 10 years.
Finally, the information industry will be disrupted, with big data alongside cloud technology directing services. These trends require data and creative individuals.
However, creative individuals develop in democracies, which provide the political environment required for the cultural diversity, tolerance and freedom of expression that nurture them.
This nation’s problem grows from the struggles of the manufacturing industry during its economic-structural transformation.
What differs from the global situation is that Taiwanese industry continues to emphasize technological and other hardware-related trends, while international enterprises include population and humanities experts who deal with global demographic structures and diverse national cultures to create new products with their technical departments.
Taiwan is used to a manufacturing industry focused on hardware, but the key to meeting the future lies in creativity, design and application.
Democracy is the strongest future economic driver, because only in an open political system will the economy be able to realize its greatest potential.
Su Tzu-yun is president of the Center for Advanced Technology at Tamkang University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS