Gou should attend to himself
After reading Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou’s (郭台銘) comments about how he thinks Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ou-po (陳歐珀) is a man of vile character, detestable qualities and worse than a beast, I feel obliged to remind Guo of his commitment to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the people of the then-Kaohsiung.
He declared back in 2007 to 2008 that his company would build an assembly plant and factory in Kaohsiung, bringing much needed investment and clean industry, if Ma was elected president. Ma is now in his second term, but there is no evidence of the promised plant.
Gou should really think of putting his own house in order before condemning others and remember his promises to Taiwanese.
Nick Pond
Greater Kaohsiung
Gou has been vocal about politics in Taiwan lately. His remarks, when extolling the youth, that liberty cannot sustain one’s belly and that economy comes before democracy, has become the butt of jokes in schools and the legislature.
Acrid comments lampooning this technology tycoon are circulating widely on the Internet.
It has generally been agreed that Gou’s thoughts were inspired by a red-faced idol that he worships at home. Yet we can make a rational assumption that this was just an instance of flattery meant to demonstrate his allegiance to Ma.
Just a few days ago, Chen Ou-po gatecrashed the funeral of Ma’s mother and scandalized the whole nation. He broke the taboo of never attending a funeral uninvited, especially a private one.
While the DPP was reeling from the incident and the media was taking great delight in condemning Chen’s stupid move, Gou held a press conference to denounce Chen as “beneath the dignity of a beast” and offering NT$3 million (US$99,300) to the folks in Yilan to recall him from office.
Gou’s move, which may have puzzled Westerners, was meant to stir up a tidal wave of indignation among millions of Taiwanese — who have been brought up to respect funeral rites solemnized by Confucius — aimed not only at bringing down Chen, but also at eroding public support for the DPP in November’s seven-in-one elections.
The public did not respond as enthusiastically as Gou had expected. The issue has simply fizzled out, as the media turned its attention to other issues of public interest.
We can also surmise that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is not interested in proceeding to recall a DPP legislator, since three of their own legislators are in danger of being recalled by the supporters of the so-called “Appendectomy Project” movement, of which the KMT legislators are currently working very hard to stifle and to outlaw by bringing a countermeasure bill in the legislature.
However, Gou’s recent political stunt has not been unrewarded. Outgoing Control Yuan President Wang Chien-hsien (王建煊) has voiced his support for Gou to run for the presidency in 2016. That may sound a bit out of tune with the public’s sentiment, but who cares.
This self-proclaimed “holy man” has made unsavory statements of a similar nature plenty of times. Gou needed a flatterer and Wang filled that position in no time.
Similarly, Ma was once lauded as “the Supreme Human Being” by his vice president, a master of flattery and a supreme quibblers in the history of Taiwanese politics.
Flattery has truly evolved into a fine art in the case of Gou’s press conference to denounce liberty and democracy in the name of a red-faced idol.
Yang Chun-hui
Salt Lake City, Utah
Educated beyond function
As a person who has received a basic education in sociology, I totally understand why Su Ching-chuan (蘇清泉) asked “what sociology departments were studying” (“‘Run your own hospital,’ legislator tells reformists,” May 10, page 4).
From the perspective of a functionalist, the most significant contribution of a sociological education is nothing more than being a beggar or coolie, it brings no more money than any other degree.
However a sociology graduate can acknowledge what makes people rich and poor from begging and how the proletariat and the capital class formed, what the differences are between the proletariat and the capital class, as well as why the proletariat engage in the fight for a utopian world from their positions of coolies.
The question of whether sociological studies are useful, is in the eyes of the beholder.
Sociology can be somewhat useful, especially when a sociology student after being tortured by his or her employer till late at a night and receiving a wage of NT$22,000, he or she can gain assistance from social workers at the local social bureau while begging.
Karl Siu
Hong Kong
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS