Compared with social movements in Taiwan as a whole, the Sunflower movement, most active in March and last month’s protests against the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) were successful. Both transcend anything we have seen before in terms of the number of people participating, the length of the protests, the physical space they encompassed and the emotions they provoked.
Most involved were between 16 and 30, either students or young people who had just begun their working lives. There were a comparable number of men and women, with slightly more women protesting in the daytime. Protesters included people from both the green and blue camps as well as swing voters.
Third-generation members of Mainlander families came together with pro-localization supporters. Everyone showed a clear, simple and straightforward approach to national identity and a deep commitment to upholding and protecting democratic values.
The actions taken by those involved woke up those Taiwanese who have long been deceived by those in power, which spells the beginning of the end for heinous political hacks. They stunned hired academics and experts and outshone those who are middle-aged or older, who often talk about maintaining the “status quo” to conceal their real yearning for sovereignty.
After the intense political conflict and implications of the social dialogue surrounding the cross-strait service trade agreement and nuclear protests, the younger generation’s calls for placing human rights and dignity above economic interests as well as their environmental values that place life ahead of electricity are gradually entering the mainstream.
Many other propositions such as stricter demands for procedural justice; stronger monitoring of our indirect representative democracy; more transparent trade negotiations with other countries; the right to referendum amd a form of direct democracy are now consolidating into a social consensus.
“Web 2.0” is a term that refers to second version of the Internet in which users are able to create content instead of just viewing it like they did in the Web 1.0 era. In this new era, technology can be used to quickly and successfully bring people from many different age groups, professions and places together to form a social force capable of acting without being limited by barriers such as time or language in order to protest against globalization.
The use of tablets and cellphones to share information and to direct activities has injected new energy into Taiwanese society and given new direction to the public. These movements and campaigns have caused Taiwan’s economic and political spheres to shift toward the younger generations.
However, the government, schools and businesses whose understanding of the Internet remain in the Web 1.0 era have a limited understanding of how to continue to adapt to Taiwanese society as it continues to shift.
Nor are such organizations capable of understanding what the 4.9 million users of Web 2.0 sites aged from 16 to 30 are thinking and doing. Members of these generations dislike bureaucrats, bureaucratic governments, political parties that refuse to reform themselves and those that lack ideals. They do not want education that is devoid of ideals and personality and they dislike industries that consume large amounts of energy, pollute the environment and lack efficiency.
If parties want votes and if schools and businesses want to attract talent, they have to make a shift to sites based on Web 2.0 technology and start to share their ideals with the public.
Chan Chang-chuan is a professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS