Asia’s funding markets are stirring and all the indications are that the continent is on the cusp of an unprecedented period of financial innovation that will provide the fuel for its next period of expansion.
Despite the continent’s voracious appetite for capital as it has transformed itself over the past 30 years, the plain vanilla bank loan has reigned supreme, stifling the growth of other capital raising options such as the region’s equities and capital markets and alternative investments environment.
Asia is fast outgrowing the bank loan model as its principal source of finance and the change is secular rather than cyclical. In relative terms, the first phase of industrialization that propelled the region into prosperity was cheap.
The next phase, where growth is powered by a combination of productivity gains and moving up the value chain, will be much harder to achieve and much more expensive. Even in the absence of other non-secular changes in the global financial environment, the bank loan model would have been unable to support continuing growth on its own.
The structure of Asia’s capital supply is changing.
We believe the down-scaling of the US Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program is and will continue to have a profound effect on financing in the region, but not in the way that most people suppose.
The fears that the taper will spark a massive withdrawal of funds from emerging markets and subsequent capital drought are exaggerated.
A recent World Bank paper estimates that just 12.8 percent of gross inflows into emerging markets between 2009 and the beginning of last year were specifically linked to Quantitative Easing (QE). The paper forecasts that the unwinding of QE will cut capital inflows by just 0.6 percent of emerging market GDP by 2016.
Similarly, we see little evidence of a capital drought as Western banks cut their loan books in Asia, first in response to the financial crisis and latterly in the expectation that Basel III banking regulations will require higher capital requirements.
Although the phenomenon is real, the region’s own financial institutions seem to have more than enough cash to make up for any shortfall.
It also looks probable that even with the taper, Western central banks will seek to keep interest rates low for the foreseeable future, encouraging investors to continue to look to emerging markets in their search for yield.
Although growth in emerging markets is unlikely to return to the heady levels it experienced before the crisis, we still expect developing economies globally to grow almost three times faster than developed economies this year.
However, June last year’s “taper tantrum” and the reduction in western bank loans have nonetheless focused the attention of Asian businesses on the potential vulnerability of their financing model; and banks — looking forward to Basel III — are looking to deliver capital to their clients in ways that do not put extra pressure on their balance sheets.
The demand profile for funding is also changing. Asian businesses are becoming increasingly sophisticated as they seek to optimize fiscal efficiency in the face of rising wages, growing competition and falling demand in the wake of the financial crisis.
Adding to the demand-side pressure for change are deregulation in China and fears of a maturity mismatch, particularly on long-term infrastructure financing. We estimate that Asia needs to invest about US$11.5 trillion in infrastructure alone between 2010 and 2030 to accommodate another 650 million people moving to cities.
The result of all these converging influences is that the Asian funding environment is starting to become more flexible, more customer-friendly and more efficient.
At its most basic level, that means that we expect initial public offering activity to pick up substantially. We are already seeing noticeably more interest from certain sectors such as retailers, real estate investment trusts and developers in raising funds in the equities market.
However, we are also expecting more Asian companies to opt for structured bond issues, or term loans from non-bank sources including private equity, hedge funds and sovereigns.
The evidence of this shift is already clear: syndicated lending to Asia ex-Japan hit US$462 billion last year, an increase of 51 percent over 2012.
To date, the limitations to the expansion of these less conventional funding solutions have not been from a shortage of supply or a lack of demand, but from the limited number of international banks that have both the reach and the expertise to link the two.`
Asia’s economies and societies have matured rapidly over the past five years, but the region needs to expand its funding options both in terms of instruments and geography. Both investors and companies are looking to new ways to adapt to a new reality and their search is leading to a new wave of financial innovation.
Noel Quinn is group general manager and regional head of commercial banking, Asia Pacific at HSBC.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS