Asia’s funding markets are stirring and all the indications are that the continent is on the cusp of an unprecedented period of financial innovation that will provide the fuel for its next period of expansion.
Despite the continent’s voracious appetite for capital as it has transformed itself over the past 30 years, the plain vanilla bank loan has reigned supreme, stifling the growth of other capital raising options such as the region’s equities and capital markets and alternative investments environment.
Asia is fast outgrowing the bank loan model as its principal source of finance and the change is secular rather than cyclical. In relative terms, the first phase of industrialization that propelled the region into prosperity was cheap.
The next phase, where growth is powered by a combination of productivity gains and moving up the value chain, will be much harder to achieve and much more expensive. Even in the absence of other non-secular changes in the global financial environment, the bank loan model would have been unable to support continuing growth on its own.
The structure of Asia’s capital supply is changing.
We believe the down-scaling of the US Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program is and will continue to have a profound effect on financing in the region, but not in the way that most people suppose.
The fears that the taper will spark a massive withdrawal of funds from emerging markets and subsequent capital drought are exaggerated.
A recent World Bank paper estimates that just 12.8 percent of gross inflows into emerging markets between 2009 and the beginning of last year were specifically linked to Quantitative Easing (QE). The paper forecasts that the unwinding of QE will cut capital inflows by just 0.6 percent of emerging market GDP by 2016.
Similarly, we see little evidence of a capital drought as Western banks cut their loan books in Asia, first in response to the financial crisis and latterly in the expectation that Basel III banking regulations will require higher capital requirements.
Although the phenomenon is real, the region’s own financial institutions seem to have more than enough cash to make up for any shortfall.
It also looks probable that even with the taper, Western central banks will seek to keep interest rates low for the foreseeable future, encouraging investors to continue to look to emerging markets in their search for yield.
Although growth in emerging markets is unlikely to return to the heady levels it experienced before the crisis, we still expect developing economies globally to grow almost three times faster than developed economies this year.
However, June last year’s “taper tantrum” and the reduction in western bank loans have nonetheless focused the attention of Asian businesses on the potential vulnerability of their financing model; and banks — looking forward to Basel III — are looking to deliver capital to their clients in ways that do not put extra pressure on their balance sheets.
The demand profile for funding is also changing. Asian businesses are becoming increasingly sophisticated as they seek to optimize fiscal efficiency in the face of rising wages, growing competition and falling demand in the wake of the financial crisis.
Adding to the demand-side pressure for change are deregulation in China and fears of a maturity mismatch, particularly on long-term infrastructure financing. We estimate that Asia needs to invest about US$11.5 trillion in infrastructure alone between 2010 and 2030 to accommodate another 650 million people moving to cities.
The result of all these converging influences is that the Asian funding environment is starting to become more flexible, more customer-friendly and more efficient.
At its most basic level, that means that we expect initial public offering activity to pick up substantially. We are already seeing noticeably more interest from certain sectors such as retailers, real estate investment trusts and developers in raising funds in the equities market.
However, we are also expecting more Asian companies to opt for structured bond issues, or term loans from non-bank sources including private equity, hedge funds and sovereigns.
The evidence of this shift is already clear: syndicated lending to Asia ex-Japan hit US$462 billion last year, an increase of 51 percent over 2012.
To date, the limitations to the expansion of these less conventional funding solutions have not been from a shortage of supply or a lack of demand, but from the limited number of international banks that have both the reach and the expertise to link the two.`
Asia’s economies and societies have matured rapidly over the past five years, but the region needs to expand its funding options both in terms of instruments and geography. Both investors and companies are looking to new ways to adapt to a new reality and their search is leading to a new wave of financial innovation.
Noel Quinn is group general manager and regional head of commercial banking, Asia Pacific at HSBC.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS