On the afternoon of April 26, the 28th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, I attended a screening of the documentary A2-B-C, at the invitation of the Taipei Bar Association, an invitation which included sitting on the panel for the ensuing discussion. The film, by Ian Ash, a US independent documentary filmmaker who has lived in Japan for 10 years, is a balanced account of the health impact on children exposed to radiation following the March 11, 2011, Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster.
The film reveals that an increasing number of children are being diagnosed with thyroid cysts and explores subtle changes in their biological and mental health, implicitly challenging the Japanese government’s insistence that radiation remains at safe levels.
This brought back memories of a visit I made, along with some professors, to a community that had been exposed to radiation contamination 20 years ago when I was still at university. I remember doctors examining children there for thyroid cysts, while worried mothers questioned the doctors on the possible health effects to their children and what they could do about it.
The most direct damage of a nuclear disaster is the impact on health due to exposure from radiation. According to a recent official Japanese government report, only a very limited number of individuals were affected by the radiation from the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant. In fact, of the cancers known to be linked to exposure to radiation, leukemia has the shortest incubation period — it can develop in only two years — while the majority of the other types, including thyroid cancer, need anywhere between five and 10 years, or more, to manifest.
Research on the effects of the Chernobyl disaster has shown that the incidents of thyroid cancer in children and adults under 18 years old when initially exposed to radiation from the disaster was 10 to 12 times higher 10 years after the event, than it was five years after.
These results show the importance of long-term monitoring of the health of people exposed to radiation. Notably, however, with this nuclear disaster, the committee of the prefectural government’s Fukushima Health Survey announced on Feb 7, almost three years after the original disaster, that a total of 33 children had already been clinically confirmed to have developed thyroid cancer, an increase of seven from the 26 confirmed cases known in November last year.
These results correspond to the prevalence of thyroid cancer from official reports from the Chernobyl disaster approximately three years after that event.
Today, only two or three years after the Japanese disaster, it is impossible to discount the relationship between the cases of thyroid cancer in children and radiation exposure: Whether the onset of cancer is related to radiation and the relationship between the cancer and the dosage received, whether age is a factor in the incubation period for children, or to what degree this period differs from that in adults, requires more scientific research.
Further, according to a WHO report on the disaster published last year, entitled Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, in the worst affected areas — including Namie-machi town and Iitate-mura village — the preliminary estimated radiation effective doses for the first year ranged from 12 to 25 millisievert (mSv), and the lifetime risk of developing thyroid cancer, breast cancer and all solid cancers is predicted to increase by up to about 70 percent, 6 percent and 4 percent respectively, over baseline rates in females exposed as infants and, for leukemia, by up to about 7 percent over baseline rates in males exposed as infants.
The report goes on to say that if the area had been evacuated at the time of the disaster, many people could have avoided being unnecessarily exposed to radiation, thereby reducing the risk of later developing many types of cancer and other ill health effects.
In other words, three years after the disaster, the risk of children developing thyroid cancer is on the rise and effective emergency response personnel evacuation and safeguards would have reduced the harm caused by radiation exposure in the immediate aftermath of the accident.
In Taiwan, our nuclear disaster response mechanism, together with response measures for the emergency evacuation of personnel within a nuclear plant’s emergency evacuation radius, medical treatment for radiation exposure and measures concerning the environment and food safety, are all much less developed compared to those in Japan.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated country, with three aging nuclear power stations in operation on an island barely 400km long, together with a fourth, uncompleted plant that has been slowly cobbled together over the past two decades. It is no wonder that concerns over nuclear safety have climaxed in Taiwan and show no signs of abating following Fukushima.
The public and the authorities need to consider that should there be a nuclear disaster with a reactor core meltdown, the area within a 30km radius of the nuclear plant in question will need to be evacuated. For northern Taiwan, this would mean that as many as 5 or 6 million people will have nowhere to escape to.
In addition, it would be difficult to guarantee that the land will not have been contaminated and this will severely affect our trade and exports which will be treated as pariahs in the global economy. Is this something we are prepared to risk, for our own sakes and those of our children?
Ho Jung-chun has a doctorate from the School of Public Health at the Taipei Medical University and is a board member of the National Association for Radiation Protection.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS