On the afternoon of April 26, the 28th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, I attended a screening of the documentary A2-B-C, at the invitation of the Taipei Bar Association, an invitation which included sitting on the panel for the ensuing discussion. The film, by Ian Ash, a US independent documentary filmmaker who has lived in Japan for 10 years, is a balanced account of the health impact on children exposed to radiation following the March 11, 2011, Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster.
The film reveals that an increasing number of children are being diagnosed with thyroid cysts and explores subtle changes in their biological and mental health, implicitly challenging the Japanese government’s insistence that radiation remains at safe levels.
This brought back memories of a visit I made, along with some professors, to a community that had been exposed to radiation contamination 20 years ago when I was still at university. I remember doctors examining children there for thyroid cysts, while worried mothers questioned the doctors on the possible health effects to their children and what they could do about it.
The most direct damage of a nuclear disaster is the impact on health due to exposure from radiation. According to a recent official Japanese government report, only a very limited number of individuals were affected by the radiation from the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant. In fact, of the cancers known to be linked to exposure to radiation, leukemia has the shortest incubation period — it can develop in only two years — while the majority of the other types, including thyroid cancer, need anywhere between five and 10 years, or more, to manifest.
Research on the effects of the Chernobyl disaster has shown that the incidents of thyroid cancer in children and adults under 18 years old when initially exposed to radiation from the disaster was 10 to 12 times higher 10 years after the event, than it was five years after.
These results show the importance of long-term monitoring of the health of people exposed to radiation. Notably, however, with this nuclear disaster, the committee of the prefectural government’s Fukushima Health Survey announced on Feb 7, almost three years after the original disaster, that a total of 33 children had already been clinically confirmed to have developed thyroid cancer, an increase of seven from the 26 confirmed cases known in November last year.
These results correspond to the prevalence of thyroid cancer from official reports from the Chernobyl disaster approximately three years after that event.
Today, only two or three years after the Japanese disaster, it is impossible to discount the relationship between the cases of thyroid cancer in children and radiation exposure: Whether the onset of cancer is related to radiation and the relationship between the cancer and the dosage received, whether age is a factor in the incubation period for children, or to what degree this period differs from that in adults, requires more scientific research.
Further, according to a WHO report on the disaster published last year, entitled Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, in the worst affected areas — including Namie-machi town and Iitate-mura village — the preliminary estimated radiation effective doses for the first year ranged from 12 to 25 millisievert (mSv), and the lifetime risk of developing thyroid cancer, breast cancer and all solid cancers is predicted to increase by up to about 70 percent, 6 percent and 4 percent respectively, over baseline rates in females exposed as infants and, for leukemia, by up to about 7 percent over baseline rates in males exposed as infants.
The report goes on to say that if the area had been evacuated at the time of the disaster, many people could have avoided being unnecessarily exposed to radiation, thereby reducing the risk of later developing many types of cancer and other ill health effects.
In other words, three years after the disaster, the risk of children developing thyroid cancer is on the rise and effective emergency response personnel evacuation and safeguards would have reduced the harm caused by radiation exposure in the immediate aftermath of the accident.
In Taiwan, our nuclear disaster response mechanism, together with response measures for the emergency evacuation of personnel within a nuclear plant’s emergency evacuation radius, medical treatment for radiation exposure and measures concerning the environment and food safety, are all much less developed compared to those in Japan.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated country, with three aging nuclear power stations in operation on an island barely 400km long, together with a fourth, uncompleted plant that has been slowly cobbled together over the past two decades. It is no wonder that concerns over nuclear safety have climaxed in Taiwan and show no signs of abating following Fukushima.
The public and the authorities need to consider that should there be a nuclear disaster with a reactor core meltdown, the area within a 30km radius of the nuclear plant in question will need to be evacuated. For northern Taiwan, this would mean that as many as 5 or 6 million people will have nowhere to escape to.
In addition, it would be difficult to guarantee that the land will not have been contaminated and this will severely affect our trade and exports which will be treated as pariahs in the global economy. Is this something we are prepared to risk, for our own sakes and those of our children?
Ho Jung-chun has a doctorate from the School of Public Health at the Taipei Medical University and is a board member of the National Association for Radiation Protection.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS