Australia Network, the top-quality TV station beamed to 46 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, including Taiwan, is almost certain to be axed by Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s government in its budget expected tomorrow.
If this happens, it will be a tragedy for the station’s many fans. With its detailed regional news coverage, in-depth interviews of regional politicians, unparalleled sports reporting — and particularly its very extensive rebroadcasting of serious documentaries gleaned from networks around the world — Australia Network is often credited with being the best English-language TV channel its viewers have ever seen.
The station combines original news broadcasts with some of the most charismatic programs created in Australia. As a result, such personalities as news anchor Jim Middleton, financial analyst Alan Kohler and Q&A host Tony Jones are household names for many English-speaking viewers throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
They present the finest face of Australia — well-informed, fair-minded and cheerful, yet serious. For such a carefully nurtured lineup to be abandoned in the interests of financial savings — especially in the context of an economy that is generally perceived as doing well — would be an act of unbelievable folly.
That Australia Network presents such a distinguished image of its country of origin has not been lost on observers. Those used to other TV stations are routinely astonished at the brevity of its commercial breaks — most programs have none at all — and the absence of both trivia from its programming and bias from its reporting.
In addition, Australia Network has a very distinguished record in English-language education, and programs devoted to this dominate the daylight hours in its target countries. For many viewers, it is this that will be missed most keenly.
A sign, perhaps, of its combination of accessibility and nonpartisan objectivity, plus its expertise at teaching the English language, is that the network was in the process of finalizing a deal to make its programs available throughout China, in conjunction with the Shanghai Media Group.
Australia would have been the third foreign country to win access to that gigantic audience. The promotional value to Australia’s image would have been impossible to overestimate, but with the likely imminent closure of the station this huge potential will quite possibly be entirely lost.
There are other media companies waiting in the wings to take over Australia Network’s role. The tendering process by which Australia’s national public broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corp, was given the right to run the station under Australia’s previous Labor government had its critics and this is not the place to repeat rumors that the Abbott administration is eager to allot the franchise to a business-friendly corporation such as Sky News.
However, if that is the outcome one cannot help but wonder whether Beijing will be as eager to admit [Sky’s] broadcasts as China’s government clearly has been to accept those of Australia Network.
Australia Network is not available to viewers within Australia. Even so, it does rebroadcast many programs familiar to Australian viewers, such as the drama series Packed to the Rafters and Home and Away, a program that investigates people’s ancestry called Who Do You Think You Are?, plus the very lively talk show Q&A, in which a panel of usually five guests from across the political spectrum answer questions live from a studio audience, is especially gripping, being both spontaneous and unpredictable. Special editions of Q&A were recently broadcast from India and China.
That programs such as this might have become routinely available across China makes one cautiously optimistic about evolving attitudes on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
There are those who over the years have accused Australia Network of being too radical and therefore not being as neutral as it claimed.
However, when a news outlet tries to be balanced and objective, there are usually who — more used to hearing religious and patriotic propaganda — accuse it of being left-leaning, morally lax and irreverent. To many however, Australia Network appears fresh and invigorating — youthful, yes, but almost never partisan.
With correspondents in regional centers, Australia Network offers a democratic and libertarian view on the Asia-Pacific region, as well as on Australia itself. Add to this in-depth interviews and a team of incisive analysts that is second to none and you have an English-language TV channel that is without equal.
If this is disbanded, English-speaking viewers throughout the region will lose a prime source of information, analysis and, most important of all, pleasure.
It would be impossible to replace.
Bradley Winterton has a master’s degree from Oxford University and a master’s of philosophy from the University of Hong Kong. He is a contributing reporter to the Taipei Times.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS