Australia Network, the top-quality TV station beamed to 46 countries in the Asia-Pacific region, including Taiwan, is almost certain to be axed by Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s government in its budget expected tomorrow.
If this happens, it will be a tragedy for the station’s many fans. With its detailed regional news coverage, in-depth interviews of regional politicians, unparalleled sports reporting — and particularly its very extensive rebroadcasting of serious documentaries gleaned from networks around the world — Australia Network is often credited with being the best English-language TV channel its viewers have ever seen.
The station combines original news broadcasts with some of the most charismatic programs created in Australia. As a result, such personalities as news anchor Jim Middleton, financial analyst Alan Kohler and Q&A host Tony Jones are household names for many English-speaking viewers throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
They present the finest face of Australia — well-informed, fair-minded and cheerful, yet serious. For such a carefully nurtured lineup to be abandoned in the interests of financial savings — especially in the context of an economy that is generally perceived as doing well — would be an act of unbelievable folly.
That Australia Network presents such a distinguished image of its country of origin has not been lost on observers. Those used to other TV stations are routinely astonished at the brevity of its commercial breaks — most programs have none at all — and the absence of both trivia from its programming and bias from its reporting.
In addition, Australia Network has a very distinguished record in English-language education, and programs devoted to this dominate the daylight hours in its target countries. For many viewers, it is this that will be missed most keenly.
A sign, perhaps, of its combination of accessibility and nonpartisan objectivity, plus its expertise at teaching the English language, is that the network was in the process of finalizing a deal to make its programs available throughout China, in conjunction with the Shanghai Media Group.
Australia would have been the third foreign country to win access to that gigantic audience. The promotional value to Australia’s image would have been impossible to overestimate, but with the likely imminent closure of the station this huge potential will quite possibly be entirely lost.
There are other media companies waiting in the wings to take over Australia Network’s role. The tendering process by which Australia’s national public broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corp, was given the right to run the station under Australia’s previous Labor government had its critics and this is not the place to repeat rumors that the Abbott administration is eager to allot the franchise to a business-friendly corporation such as Sky News.
However, if that is the outcome one cannot help but wonder whether Beijing will be as eager to admit [Sky’s] broadcasts as China’s government clearly has been to accept those of Australia Network.
Australia Network is not available to viewers within Australia. Even so, it does rebroadcast many programs familiar to Australian viewers, such as the drama series Packed to the Rafters and Home and Away, a program that investigates people’s ancestry called Who Do You Think You Are?, plus the very lively talk show Q&A, in which a panel of usually five guests from across the political spectrum answer questions live from a studio audience, is especially gripping, being both spontaneous and unpredictable. Special editions of Q&A were recently broadcast from India and China.
That programs such as this might have become routinely available across China makes one cautiously optimistic about evolving attitudes on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
There are those who over the years have accused Australia Network of being too radical and therefore not being as neutral as it claimed.
However, when a news outlet tries to be balanced and objective, there are usually who — more used to hearing religious and patriotic propaganda — accuse it of being left-leaning, morally lax and irreverent. To many however, Australia Network appears fresh and invigorating — youthful, yes, but almost never partisan.
With correspondents in regional centers, Australia Network offers a democratic and libertarian view on the Asia-Pacific region, as well as on Australia itself. Add to this in-depth interviews and a team of incisive analysts that is second to none and you have an English-language TV channel that is without equal.
If this is disbanded, English-speaking viewers throughout the region will lose a prime source of information, analysis and, most important of all, pleasure.
It would be impossible to replace.
Bradley Winterton has a master’s degree from Oxford University and a master’s of philosophy from the University of Hong Kong. He is a contributing reporter to the Taipei Times.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS