A series of dramatic attacks in Chinese public spaces signals a worrying new attempt by militants from mainly Muslim Xinjiang to raise the stakes in response to Beijing’s heavy security measures, analysts say.
Violence, long concentrated against local security authorities and in street rioting, has since late last year been aimed at high-profile targets both inside and outside the resource-rich region.
A fiery vehicle crash in Tiananmen Square in October last year was followed by a horrific knife attack in March at a railway station in Kunming in which 29 died and 143 were wounded.
Last week assailants who were using knives and explosive devices attached to their bodies attacked a train station in Urumqi, Xinjiang’s capital, resulting in three deaths — including two alleged attackers — and 79 wounded.
On Tuesday a lone attacker was shot and caught after a slashing attack that injured six people at a station in Guangzhou, police said, which further frayed nerves.
Raffaello Pantucci, an expert at the Royal United Services Institute in London, called the apparent change in tactics a “worrying development” by militants who saw themselves as “part of an oppressed people who are not being recognized and supported.”
“Obviously, people don’t think that their message is getting through and that they’re being heard,” he said. “If they’re not being heard, then you have to make a louder sound.”
“There may be some negative repercussions, but the negative repercussions in some way will only feed the narrative that you’re trying to advance,” he said.
Tensions in Xinjiang have simmered for decades, with the Muslim Uighurs in the far western region claiming discrimination in religious practices and jobs in the face of large numbers of immigrants from China’s Han majority. About 200 people died in inter-ethnic rioting in 2009.
China has vowed repeatedly to crackdown on violence in Xinjiang, most recently during a visit last week by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), which was his first since assuming office last year.
He promised “decisive actions” against terrorism and called the Kashgar area the “front line in anti-terrorist efforts.”
It borders Central Asia, from where some — including Beijing — say radicals of the Turkestan Islamic Party (TIP) and East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), influenced by al-Qaeda, inspire and even orchestrate violence in China.
Rohan Gunaratna, professor of security studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, welcomed Xi’s comments as long overdue.
“China now faces a very significant threat from terrorism emanating from the ideology and also by the training infrastructure that the Turkestan Islamic Party has established in North Waziristan” in Pakistan’s tribal areas, he said.
The TIP “is currently recruiting, currently radicalizing a number of Uighurs to conduct terrorist attacks,” he said, describing the recent incidents as “milestones” that heralded more “in the coming months and coming years.”
However, many other experts question the influence of the TIP, a shadowy group that has released videos praising attacks in China, but has yet explicitly to claim responsibility for them.
Nor, for that matter, has anyone else, said Sean Roberts, an expert on Uighurs at George Washington University in the US capital.
“Even if there is an organization behind the attacks, it would likely be a homegrown organization as opposed to an international organization because for an international group, there would be some claim to take credit,” Roberts said.
“A lot of terrorism doesn’t require much organization at all,” he added, citing last year’s Boston Marathon bombings.
The US attack was “much more sophisticated than anything in these train stations, but yet it seems quite clear that it was just the work of two people and there was no outside organization behind it,” Roberts said.
Scott Harold, a China expert with US think tank Rand Corp, said: “ETIM is not central in any way to the broad concerns of al-Qaeda or any of the Sunni Islamist movements worldwide.
“It’s marginal even compared to a group like [Nigeria’s] Boko Haram, which is usually described as a marginal part of al-Qaeda,” he said.
The night after the Urumqi violence, Beijing police held anti-terror drills at a key railway station in the center of the capital.
Chinese authorities have yet to attribute a motive for the Guangzhou incident.
However, Mao Shoulong (毛壽龍), a professor of public administration at Beijing’s Renmin University, said the escalating violence was sure to be met with stronger measures by the government.
“The general reaction is likely that vigilance will be tightened nationwide,” he said. “More police will be added and more training will be done.”
Ultimately, though, a harsher response to the escalation is unlikely to prove a deterrent, according to Pantucci.
“All of that is only going to exacerbate the tensions and the sense of alienation in the community,” he said. “So it’s kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy in some ways. From both sides it sort of feeds off each other.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS