A series of dramatic attacks in Chinese public spaces signals a worrying new attempt by militants from mainly Muslim Xinjiang to raise the stakes in response to Beijing’s heavy security measures, analysts say.
Violence, long concentrated against local security authorities and in street rioting, has since late last year been aimed at high-profile targets both inside and outside the resource-rich region.
A fiery vehicle crash in Tiananmen Square in October last year was followed by a horrific knife attack in March at a railway station in Kunming in which 29 died and 143 were wounded.
Last week assailants who were using knives and explosive devices attached to their bodies attacked a train station in Urumqi, Xinjiang’s capital, resulting in three deaths — including two alleged attackers — and 79 wounded.
On Tuesday a lone attacker was shot and caught after a slashing attack that injured six people at a station in Guangzhou, police said, which further frayed nerves.
Raffaello Pantucci, an expert at the Royal United Services Institute in London, called the apparent change in tactics a “worrying development” by militants who saw themselves as “part of an oppressed people who are not being recognized and supported.”
“Obviously, people don’t think that their message is getting through and that they’re being heard,” he said. “If they’re not being heard, then you have to make a louder sound.”
“There may be some negative repercussions, but the negative repercussions in some way will only feed the narrative that you’re trying to advance,” he said.
Tensions in Xinjiang have simmered for decades, with the Muslim Uighurs in the far western region claiming discrimination in religious practices and jobs in the face of large numbers of immigrants from China’s Han majority. About 200 people died in inter-ethnic rioting in 2009.
China has vowed repeatedly to crackdown on violence in Xinjiang, most recently during a visit last week by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), which was his first since assuming office last year.
He promised “decisive actions” against terrorism and called the Kashgar area the “front line in anti-terrorist efforts.”
It borders Central Asia, from where some — including Beijing — say radicals of the Turkestan Islamic Party (TIP) and East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), influenced by al-Qaeda, inspire and even orchestrate violence in China.
Rohan Gunaratna, professor of security studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, welcomed Xi’s comments as long overdue.
“China now faces a very significant threat from terrorism emanating from the ideology and also by the training infrastructure that the Turkestan Islamic Party has established in North Waziristan” in Pakistan’s tribal areas, he said.
The TIP “is currently recruiting, currently radicalizing a number of Uighurs to conduct terrorist attacks,” he said, describing the recent incidents as “milestones” that heralded more “in the coming months and coming years.”
However, many other experts question the influence of the TIP, a shadowy group that has released videos praising attacks in China, but has yet explicitly to claim responsibility for them.
Nor, for that matter, has anyone else, said Sean Roberts, an expert on Uighurs at George Washington University in the US capital.
“Even if there is an organization behind the attacks, it would likely be a homegrown organization as opposed to an international organization because for an international group, there would be some claim to take credit,” Roberts said.
“A lot of terrorism doesn’t require much organization at all,” he added, citing last year’s Boston Marathon bombings.
The US attack was “much more sophisticated than anything in these train stations, but yet it seems quite clear that it was just the work of two people and there was no outside organization behind it,” Roberts said.
Scott Harold, a China expert with US think tank Rand Corp, said: “ETIM is not central in any way to the broad concerns of al-Qaeda or any of the Sunni Islamist movements worldwide.
“It’s marginal even compared to a group like [Nigeria’s] Boko Haram, which is usually described as a marginal part of al-Qaeda,” he said.
The night after the Urumqi violence, Beijing police held anti-terror drills at a key railway station in the center of the capital.
Chinese authorities have yet to attribute a motive for the Guangzhou incident.
However, Mao Shoulong (毛壽龍), a professor of public administration at Beijing’s Renmin University, said the escalating violence was sure to be met with stronger measures by the government.
“The general reaction is likely that vigilance will be tightened nationwide,” he said. “More police will be added and more training will be done.”
Ultimately, though, a harsher response to the escalation is unlikely to prove a deterrent, according to Pantucci.
“All of that is only going to exacerbate the tensions and the sense of alienation in the community,” he said. “So it’s kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy in some ways. From both sides it sort of feeds off each other.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS