In Taiwan, every movement that tries to instigate political or social reforms now is sure to identify itself as nonviolent, to the extent that the term has become something of a cliche. Nonetheless, nonviolence is indeed one school of thought among these movements, with academics and religious figures among its proponents.
Nobody likes violence, but some are doubtful about the practical applications of adherence to nonviolence in social reform movements. The doubters often ask how advocates of nonviolence would handle a situation in which a lunatic was running around the streets with a machine gun and shooting people on sight.
They also ask how they would respond if, instead of the lunatic, they were faced with a cruel and violent dictatorship that killed people at will.
Among all the radical social and political reforms that have changed the course of history, such as the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the revolutions in China of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party, no matter whether they have led to weal or woe, none of them has succeeded by relying on nonviolence.
Moreover, those who attempted to bring about reforms through such movements often glorified the violence they employed by using such terms as “uprising,” “martyrdom” and “sacrifice.”
In this era, Taiwanese have woken up. Their demands for democracy on the home front and independence in the international arena have become increasingly vehement. When the UN was established after World War II, its membership consisted of 51 independent nations, but that number has since grown to 193.
Considered from the point of view of democracy and independence, how many of these countries gained their independence based on the principle of nonviolence?
China has deployed 1,500 missiles aimed at Taiwan and it has enacted its “Anti-Secession” Law as a pretext for using armed force. China has been rapidly expanding its already impressive military strength, and it has let it be known that it would not stop short of using military force to attack Taiwan. Can Taiwan respond to such threats by nonviolent means?
Taiwan’s democracy has been extolled as a “bloodless and peaceful revolution,” but that is a hugely inaccurate description.
The vast majority of people in Taiwan have been kept in the dark about how many enthusiastic upholders of democratic ideals were quietly oppressed, arrested, and even tortured and killed under the KMT dictatorship.
Taiwan’s democracy was founded on the blood of these countless and often nameless heroes.
Amid the current clashes between government authorities and popular movements in Taiwan, calls for “countering violence with violence” are starting to be heard on both sides of the political spectrum.
They are beginning to look like two trains speeding toward one another on a single track. Unfortunately, humans are living creatures and violence, be it for good or evil, is probably an irrepressible instinct of living things.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS