The Educational Testing Service (ETS) released its report on the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) last month. A total of 264,563 Taiwanese took the proficiency test last year, and almost 85 percent of them had a bachelor’s degree or above. The report shows that English proficiency among Taiwanese is falling further behind many Asian countries, as the average score dropped from 542 to 539 points, the lowest in recent years.
The score is far lower than China’s 747, Malaysia’s 688, the Philippines’ 678 and South Korea’s 628, and the gap has drawn a lot of criticism.
The gap can be attributed in part to the different test-taking populations. In China, for example, many of the test takers are outstanding graduates from top universities who want to enter international enterprises, and their English proficiency is far above average.
However, an increasing number of firms and schools in Taiwan use it as a recruitment or graduation threshold, so it is a bit unfair for the media to criticize the national average, which is more than 200 points lower than China in the 990-point test.
Still, the report shows that the average score for Taiwan’s high-school students was 582, which was higher than the score of 504 for college students. This means that most students’ English proficiency peaks when they prepare for the joint college entrance exam, and then declines during their college years. No wonder their English is poor when they enter the workplace.
To improve this, schools, students and industry should take action. Universities must increase class hours for English, adjust their curriculum by adding useful business-related materials and employ more flexible teaching methods to stimulate learning.
Students should be aware of the importance of foreign languages in the globalized workplace and take an active role in language learning. Perhaps the best way would be to create an English-language environment around them, connect learning to their personal interests and keep practicing constantly.
Companies could perhaps raise the recruitment threshold from 550 to 650 points in order to recruit better graduates while encouraging applicants to learn English well. They could also provide training programs or even incentive payments to those who passed foreign language proficiency tests.
As for those who failed to reach the average score, they could benefit from some tips. First, test-takers should be familiar with the test format. The TOEIC Listening Test is a 45-minute multiple-choice assessment with 100 questions in four sections: photographs, question-response, conversations and short talks. Test-takers listen to some questions and conversations recorded in English — such as speeches, introductions, reports, telephone messages, or radio announcements — and answer questions based on what they have heard. The first section is related to actions and places, such as an office, a classroom and an airport. For other sections, questions related to the 5Ws and 1H (who, what, when, where, why, how) are often tested, and the purpose of each conversation is the key.
Many students complain that the listening test is extremely difficult due to the speakers’ strong accents. Since a variety of accents are featured in addition to an American accent, they can listen to BBC World News on the radio or the Internet to gradually get used to the British and other accents.
Second, the TOEIC Reading Test is a 75-minute multiple-choice assessment with 100 questions in three sections: incomplete sentences, error recognition or text completion, and reading comprehension. Test-takers read a variety of materials, and respond at their own pace. For this part, they should actively expand their vocabulary, be familiar with sentence structures and the use of conjunctions, and increase reading speed through extensive reading.
Moreover, they should be familiar with various formats of reading materials — such as news/business reports, advertisements, announcements, instructions, charts, letters, e-mail, agendas, and memos — which frequently appear in the reading test.
Of course, Taiwan’s low TOEIC score does not necessarily equal a low degree of internationalization, but it indicates that many Taiwanese have difficulty communicating with the rest of the world in English, and this deserves greater attention.
Chang Sheng-en is an assistant professor of English at Shih Hsin University.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would