President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) told a prayer breakfast meeting yesterday in New Taipei City (新北市) that he has heard the voice of the people and that there were many things the government needed to work on. Unfortunately, however, it looks as though the nation’s prayers will not be answered as a result of that breakfast meeting, because Ma’s remarks showed he still suffers from the hearing impairment that has plagued him for years — selective listening.
He only hears the sycophantic voices of those closest to him, not those further away who disagree with his policies, no matter how loud they shout.
The president did promise to redouble the government’s efforts to improve the economy, create more investments and exports and to ensure the poor get more. However, he said nothing about reining in his drive to bind the nation’s economy with that of China or addressing concerns raised by the closed-door negotiations with Beijing that have led to the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) or the services trade agreement.
How could he claim yesterday that he has heard the voice of the people when he obviously did not hear about the results of two polls, one conducted by Taiwan Indicators Survey Research (TISR), the other by cable news channel TVBS, which were released on Thursday?
The TISR poll found that 68.3 percent of respondents are very wary about the prospect of a cross-strait peace agreement and do not want negotiations for such a pact to begin before a national referendum is held to sanction such talks. Just about the same number (67.9 percent) said they were opposed to the idea that if a cross-strait peace pact were signed, unification with China should be recognized as a national goal.
The TVBS survey found that 71 percent of respondents support Taiwan’s independence from China if given the option of either backing independence or supporting unification. The poll also found that 64 percent supported maintaining the “status quo.”
Even Mainland Affairs Council spokeswoman Wu Mei-hung (吳美紅) said the TVBS results show that the government should move forward on its policy toward China based on mainstream public opinion.
The message that a majority of Taiwanese are not rushing as fast as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to embrace the autocratic monolith on the other side of the Taiwan Strait came through loud and clear on Thursday — as it has been in poll after poll in recent years — and yet it is obvious that no one in Ma’s inner circle in the KMT, the Presidential Office or Ma himself, is paying the slightest attention.
Ma is continuing to urge quick passage of the service trade pact by the legislature — under the guise that it will help the economy — despite the criticism and protests from all levels of society against it. The complaints raised about the way that the pact was reached are exactly the same as those heard after the ECFA was inked, yet the administration did not change its course.
He continues to send government and KMT officials to cozy up to their Chinese counterparts — dispatching Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) to the recent APEC forum in Bali and former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) to a forum with the Chinese Communist Party in Nanning, China, last weekend — where the dominant voice of such meetings comes from Beijing. Ma’s determination to open Taiwan up to China has been the hallmark of his presidency.
Ma can say he is listening to the public, but his actions belie his words. So it should come as no surprise then that so many Taiwanese no longer give any credence to what they hear from him.
The small Baltic nation of Lithuania last week announced that it would accept a Taiwanese representative office in its capital, Vilnius, and that it would establish its own trade office in Taiwan by the end of the year. This was more than a welcome announcement to Taiwan and goes far beyond the normal establishment of trade relations. Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Gabrielius Landsbergis summed it up succinctly, boldly saying: “Freedom-loving people should look out for each other.” With these words, Landsbergis was purposefully going beyond normal diplomacy; he was also presenting a moral challenge and reminder to other democratic nations. A look
On a peaceful day in the open Pacific Ocean to the east of Taiwan, a US carrier and five accompanying warships were slowly sailing to guard the western Pacific. Another carrier battle group had just returned to its home port in San Diego. Suddenly, alarms went off as many intercontinental ballistic missiles were launched from the interior of China, flying toward Taiwan. Numerous Chinese warships, carriers, fighter jets, bombers and submarines were fast converging on the US ships. Not too long after, missiles, bombs and torpedoes were fired at the US carrier. The surprise to Americans was the number of
I was a bit startled last week when Legislative Yuan Speaker You Si-kun (游錫堃) suggested that the United States could extend official recognition to an independent Taiwan if China were to launch an invasion. While I think Speaker You is correct, I am not sure it is a helpful point of view. Naturally, there are contingency plans in Washington on diplomatic actions that could deter Chinese military action, but they contemplate the continuity of a democratic Taiwanese government that could survive offshore in exile if part or all of Taiwan is occupied by communist Chinese forces. China’s threat that “Taiwan
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) unscheduled visit to Tibet on July 20 attracted extensive international attention. Although Chinese media said that Xi’s visit was meant to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the accession of Tibet to China, Tibet has remained a politically charged issue for China as well as the international community. The genesis of the turbulent ties between Tibet and China dates back to 1951, when the Chinese regime annexed Tibet through a seven-point agreement. China has used this agreement as proof of its sovereignty over Tibet. Tibetans argue that they were forced to sign the agreement, leading them