Planning for a 10-year long-term care plan began under the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, but President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is now calling it one of its “political achievements.” So what has Ma done? Whatever it is, it clearly does not pass any sort of litmus test.
A few days ago, media reports said a daughter-in-law was suspected of beating her mother-in-law to death after losing control of her emotions. The reports said the mother-in-law had had a stroke and had been placed in a nursing home, but because of the family’s meager income, she had to go back home where her daughter-in-law looked after her. If the Ma government has achieved anything, why do tragedies like this keep happening?
While the Ma administration’s recent long-term care policies may have won it some praise, these policies ignore the needs of ordinary people. The Cabinet is not interested in talking about establishing affordable long-term care services; instead, it is encouraging people to purchase private long-term care insurance while allowing life insurance companies to run long-term care services, so they can sell long-term care insurance and operate long-term care services. However, the average family cannot afford such insurance and services.
The Ministry of the Interior recently proposed a reverse mortgage policy that would provide financial assistance to elderly people not eligible for pensions. However, this would only benefit those who own a house. The Council of Labor Affairs also proposed a trial scheme of hiring foreign nurses on an hourly basis, but this would merely provide those who can already afford a foreign nurse with an extra option. The government’s long-term care policies only serve large corporations and those with a lot of cash or who own property. In addition, the government is planning to increase labor insurance premiums and cutting labor pension payments.
Academics and experts warned long ago that Taiwanese society is aging. With the number of disabled or incapacitated people increasing, the pressure of having to take care of them will lead to more family disputes and broken homes, they said. Women, who are traditionally expected to take charge of family care and who normally have less money than men, will bear the brunt of these policies. The privatization of long-term care, coupled with shrinking guarantees for labor pensions, will cause a string of tragedies to sweep Taiwanese society.
If the government keeps stubbornly doing what it wants instead of what the public needs, government officials may be shocked to discover a future in which most Taiwanese cannot afford private health insurance, the care services sold by profit-making companies or caregivers from Southeast Asian countries. The government wants to strengthen family relations, but no essay competition in the world will be able to change the fact that such relations have long been destroyed by the pressures of providing long-term care.
Sixteen years ago, academics and experts underlined the need for the government to introduce universal and affordable public care services. Only when the provision of care services is no longer a private concern and becomes a matter of government concern or an important part of the national infrastructure will there be room to reduce the stress put on families to provide care.
Unfortunately, the Ma administration seems uninterested in this matter, and one can only wonder if the public has to wait another 16 years before something happens.
Chyn Yu-rung is director of policy at the Awakening Foundation.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS