Policymakers everywhere might want to consider three salient traits about South Korean President Park Geun-hye, who is making a high-profile state visit to Washington this week.
First, when she was in her twenties, she suffered the violent deaths of both of her parents. Her mother died at the hand of a North Korean assassin and her father, former South Korean president Park Chung-hee, was murdered by an aide five years later. Coping emotionally with that searing experience has surely put steel into Park Geun-hye’s spine.
Second, rising as a woman through the political ranks of South Korea, without question among the world’s most male-dominated societies, has been no mean feat. Park Geun-hye won her first election to the National Assembly in 1998 with 51.5 percent of the vote. She won her fourth election 10 years later with 88.6 percent of the vote.
Third, she seems to be a private, even mysterious person. After her mother’s death, she became her father’s official hostess, a duty she accomplished with charm and grace. However, after her father’s death she disappeared from the public eye for nearly 20 years before re-emerging into politics. She has never married.
The new president, the first woman to be elected to head South Korea, has made clear her intentions toward North Korea. She has called for building trust between north and south, but has asserted that this “rests on strong deterrence and it is not a policy of appeasement.”
And while she may propose ways to deal with the North that sound “soft,” her counterpart in Pyongang, Kim Jong-un, “should know that if push comes to shove, she will stare him down,” South Korean academic and adviser Lee Chung-min said.
Against this backdrop, several commentators, both from South Korea and the West, have already suggested that Park Geun-hye will turn out to be the “Iron Lady of Korea.”
Park Geun-hye met US President Barack Obama in the White House on Tuesday. The agenda apparently had no surprises: the North Korean threat, trade and other economic issues, ways to strengthen the alliance between the US and South Korea on the 60th anniversary of the end of the Korean War.
US defense officials and military officers have been quietly critical of previous South Korean governments, allegedly for failing to take full responsibility for the defense of their nation. In large part, that means resisting increases in military spending.
Perhaps the more interesting event was Park Geun-hye’s address to a joint meeting of the US Senate and US House of Representatives yesterday.
“Given the North Korean regime’s recent provocative actions, President Park’s address to Congress will serve as a vital and timely reminder that Americans and South Koreans will continue to stand shoulder to shoulder,” US House Speaker John Boehner said.
Most foreign leaders who are invited to address the US Congress have been established political leaders, not newly elected like Park Geun-hye; she was inaugurated in February.
In the past five years, those who have addressed the Congress have included former South Korean president Lee Myung-bak, Park Geun-hye’s predecessor.
Others include Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, former Mexican president Felipe Calderon, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, former British prime minister Gordon Brown and former Irish taoiseach Bertie Ahearn. In sum, Park Geun-hye will be in good company.
South Korean officials have suggested that their president will call for a multilateral initiative in Northeast Asia in which China, Japan, South Korea, Mongolia, Russia and the US seek to resolve environmental issues. If such an effort was successful, members would step up to more difficult issues, such as maritime security.
Another if: North Korea would be invited to join the initiative if Kim could give assurances that his regime would live up to whatever agreements they made. Pyongyang’s record on this score is not good, which may be the understatement of the week.
In addition, Park Geun-hye has brought with her a large entourage of business executives from the chaebol, or conglomerates, who will be meeting with US executives to discuss trade.
This is significant as the US has long complained that Seoul blocked many US exports to South Korea.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms