How refreshing the past few months have been. At long last, a group of young people — still relatively small in number, but certainly active and extremely canny — has achieved things that well-funded and established political parties, concerned as they are with continuity, can only dream of accomplishing.
This new phenomenon, which sprouted legs sometime in the middle of last year, is the youth movement, which over time has expanded from a single-issue group into a multifaceted and cross-pollinating entity that mobilizes wherever injustice rears its ugly head. From the defeat of Want Want China Times Group chairman Tsai Eng-meng’s (蔡衍明) efforts to create a media goliath through the acquisition of four of Jimmy Lai’s (黎智英) Next Media outlets in Taiwan, to an ongoing campaign against the destruction of the Losheng (Happy Life) Sanatorium and the forced eviction of elderly residents of the Huaguang Community (華光) in Taipei, the several hundreds of highly educated, connected, Internet-savvy young people who form the core of this group are showing Taiwan the way forward.
It would be easy to dismiss their protests as simply for show, of being protests for the sake of publicity, were it not for their acts serving as instruments of education. The social media platforms that have been created in parallel with the protests are often more current and learned than anything one will find in the mass media.
Furthermore, their mobilization, with support from a number of academics, is engendering essential public debate on issues that otherwise would be ignored.
Even more important is that their protests are actions, not the hollow talk usually served by politicians from both sides of the political divide. Those actions are, in turn, prompting reactions. Occasionally, those reactions are overreactions, such as the targeting of young students, like Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷), by both Tsai’s media empire and government authorities, or just this week, the Miaoli County Police Department’s handling of the protests over the wind turbine project in Yuanli Township (苑裡).
Through its actions, the youth movement is bringing out the best and the worst in government officials and ordinary people alike, which inevitably creates a clash in values and interests.
When peaceful protests in Yuanli are broken by police who ride on Thursday last week roughshod over the law, using disproportionate measures such as handcuffing activists, or threatening their immediate arrest if they turned out again, it forces people to scrutinize how our law enforcement agencies, along with the Ministry of the Interior, are abiding by the rules of the nation’s democratic system. Using every electronic tool at their disposal, the young protesters, aided by a pool of stalwart journalists, are making sure that everything is well documented.
When the authorities fail, as they evidently did in Miaoli in the past week, senior officials come under fire, as occurred on Wednesday, when Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) and other top officials faced heated questions in the legislature, prompting Lee to promise an investigation. It was fascinating to see how the subject focused the minds of the Democratic Progressive Party legislators, who led the charge.
When was the last time that political parties forced the public to look at articles of the law, or to think about such fundamentals as freedom of the press or the right to property?
In the past year, the youth movement has dared to dream and to take a stand in the defense of the values that are supposed to serve as the foundations for this nation. Unlike the politicians who speak in abstract terms and often seem to take those values for granted, this nascent youth movement is willing to fight for them, and to teach us lessons in the process.
The time has come for rejuvenation, and for that to happen, what is required is action — physical involvement, and the catalysis of anger in the face of injustice. Yes, such mobilization causes disturbances and sometimes leads to clashes, but it is now clear that this is what is necessary to shake the majority of Taiwanese out of their comfortable stupor before it is too late.
J. Michael Cole is a deputy news editor at the Taipei Times.
The small Baltic nation of Lithuania last week announced that it would accept a Taiwanese representative office in its capital, Vilnius, and that it would establish its own trade office in Taiwan by the end of the year. This was more than a welcome announcement to Taiwan and goes far beyond the normal establishment of trade relations. Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Gabrielius Landsbergis summed it up succinctly, boldly saying: “Freedom-loving people should look out for each other.” With these words, Landsbergis was purposefully going beyond normal diplomacy; he was also presenting a moral challenge and reminder to other democratic nations. A look
On a peaceful day in the open Pacific Ocean to the east of Taiwan, a US carrier and five accompanying warships were slowly sailing to guard the western Pacific. Another carrier battle group had just returned to its home port in San Diego. Suddenly, alarms went off as many intercontinental ballistic missiles were launched from the interior of China, flying toward Taiwan. Numerous Chinese warships, carriers, fighter jets, bombers and submarines were fast converging on the US ships. Not too long after, missiles, bombs and torpedoes were fired at the US carrier. The surprise to Americans was the number of
I was a bit startled last week when Legislative Yuan Speaker You Si-kun (游錫堃) suggested that the United States could extend official recognition to an independent Taiwan if China were to launch an invasion. While I think Speaker You is correct, I am not sure it is a helpful point of view. Naturally, there are contingency plans in Washington on diplomatic actions that could deter Chinese military action, but they contemplate the continuity of a democratic Taiwanese government that could survive offshore in exile if part or all of Taiwan is occupied by communist Chinese forces. China’s threat that “Taiwan
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) unscheduled visit to Tibet on July 20 attracted extensive international attention. Although Chinese media said that Xi’s visit was meant to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the accession of Tibet to China, Tibet has remained a politically charged issue for China as well as the international community. The genesis of the turbulent ties between Tibet and China dates back to 1951, when the Chinese regime annexed Tibet through a seven-point agreement. China has used this agreement as proof of its sovereignty over Tibet. Tibetans argue that they were forced to sign the agreement, leading them