In the annals of Chinese bureaucratic power, the Ministry of Railways stood apart. Running everything from one of the world’s busiest rail systems to a special police force, the ministry that Chinese called “Boss Railway” was so pervasive and powerful it resisted government reform efforts for years.
On Sunday, Beijing gave notice that it was firing the boss. Under a plan presented to the National People’s Congress — China’s largely rubber-stamp legislature — to restructure Cabinet departments, the government said it would dismantle the ministry, moving its railways operations to a newly created company and placing its regulatory offices in the Chinese Ministry of Transport.
The railway ministry is not the only target of reform: Under the restructuring plan, two agencies that censor broadcasters and print media will be combined into a super media regulator; the commission that enforces the much disliked rules that limit many to only having one child will be merged with the Chinese Ministry of Health; and five agencies that police fisheries and other maritime resources are being united to better assert China’s control over disputed waters, potentially sharpening conflicts with Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines.
Certain to be passed by the legislature this week, the plan reflects the priorities of the newly installed Chinese Communist Party leadership as it seeks to reduce waste, boost efficiency and address quality-of-life issues for a more prosperous, demanding society. The scope and power of the railways ministry made it a natural place for the leadership to stamp its determination. As it expanded the railway system and built the world’s largest high-speed rail network, the ministry ran up hundreds of billions of US dollars in debt and sank into corruption, giving critics an opportunity to pounce.
Reformers crowed at the ministry’s abolition, saying it would further reforms.
“It means the country has removed the last ‘stronghold’ in the way of reforming the industry from a planned economy to market economy,” the Xinhua news agency quoted Wang Yiming (王一鳴), deputy head of the Academy of Macroeconomic Research under the National Development and Reform Commission, as saying.
Even the current — and seemingly last — railways minister had to bow to the inevitable.
“I’ve no regrets. Whether I’m minister of railways or not is no matter,” Sheng Guangzu (盛光祖) said on China National Radio. “The key is to develop China’s railways. I’m subordinate to the needs of the national cause.”
Reform-minded Chinese leaders and officials had been trying to bring the railways to heel for 15 years when the government first started separating state companies from regulatory bodies. At each turn, the ministry resisted, using long-standing ties to the military and building a record for performance. Over the past decade, it created the showcase high-speed rail system touted by the leadership as a symbol for Chinese technological power on par with the space program.
In announcing the restructuring, a senior Chinese official praised the progress, but explained why the ministry had to be abolished.
“In recent years, the railways have developed in leaps and bounds, and safeguarded the smooth running of the economy and the needs of people’s lives and production. However, its government and enterprises are not separated. It doesn’t link smoothly with other modes of transport and there are other problems,” Chinese State Council Secretary-General Ma Kai (馬凱) told legislators.
Complaints about the railway system are common among Chinese. It is the most widely used form of long-distance transport, especially for Chinese who cannot afford to fly. However, buying a ticket is difficult, and food, drink and other services on trains are poor — problems often attributed to corruption.
“Corruption? Of course there is in the railway bureau. There’s that Boss Railway,” 32-year-old businessman Chang Shangxi said as he waited for a high-speed train in Shanghai last week.
“I am sure corruption causes corners to be cut and work to be faked as the companies have to make the money back that they spent on corruption,” he added.
The ministry’s ability to throw money around to get things done and preserve its power ultimately contributed to its downfall.
Former Chinese minister of railways Liu Zhijun (劉志軍), the bullet train network’s top promoter, was ousted two years ago amid accusations that he took massive bribes and steered contracts, some of them associated with the high-speed rail. Among his rumored misdeeds: having 18 mistresses.
Though he awaits trial, his fate — and perhaps the ministry’s — seemed sealed when bullet trains collided near the city of Wenzhou in July 2011, killing 40 people and injuring 177. The accident outraged the country’s growing middle class — the primary users of high-speed trains. Taking to social media sites, they questioned whether speedy development resulted in shoddy work. A government investigation cited design flaws and mismanagement.
In the aftermath, the government began taking a harder look at corruption throughout the railways and the ministry. In one case, almost all of a US$260 million railway line in the country’s northeast had to be redone because unqualified sub-contractors filled bridge foundations with rocks and sand instead of concrete.
The ministry employs 2.1 million staff and handled 1.8 billion passengers in 2011. Its subsidiary departments oversee all railway operations and its companies are involved with everything from the design of railways to construction and freight transport. Beyond that, there is the Railway Art Troupe, which sings, dances and puts on acrobatic shows and operas. The China Locomotive Sports Team trains athletes in soccer, boxing, weightlifting, swimming, and track and field. Until August last year, it operated its own courts, as it did a police force until 2009. Capital spending last year was 630 billion yuan (US$100 billion) — rivaling the 670 billion yuan budgeted for the entire military — and its mounting debts have worried the government.
“Who is going to pay the debt that is expected to amount to nearly 3 trillion yuan?” Beijing Jiaotong University railway expert Zhao Jian (趙堅 ) asked.
He said the official debt figure is 2.6 trillion yuan, but he estimates it will rise as ongoing projects are completed.
The reorganization is supposed to add further restraint. The newly created China Railway Corporation will build and manage freight and passenger services, while a railways administration under the Ministry of Transport will set technical standards and enforce them.
The railway so far has been able to rely for a large part on drawing revenue from freight and passenger services. A big challenge ahead is keeping that money coming in as competition from planes, cars and river transport increases.
Associated Press researchers Yu Bing in Beijing and Fu Ting in Shanghai contributed to this report
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS