According to statistics from the Ministry of the Interior’s Department of Household Registration, there were 324,980, 227,447 and 166,473 babies born in 1997, 2003 and 2010 respectively. In three years’ time, many of the nation’s colleges and universities will be facing a 12-year-long “low birthrate cliff.” Is the nation ready for this?
Perhaps Taiwan can learn from Japan’s experience.
In his book Decline of Collective Intelligence, Japanese business strategist Kenichi Ohmae described the current situation at Japanese universities: A lot of local national universities look like a mini-version of the University of Tokyo, without any defining characteristics of their own. As the number of students constantly declines, they are doomed to collapse due to financial difficulties sooner or later.
Looking at Taiwan’s situation, in June last year the Ministry of Education released the “regulations for the merging of national universities.” Depending on how much universities could complement one another, the goal is to merge schools into “comprehensive universities.”
However, if we push to merge national universities in accordance with these regulations, then our higher education providers are likely to see a repeat of Japan’s mistake by 2028. By that time, we will have only slightly cut the number of school presidents and administrative staff, while the number of departments, faculties and assistants will remain unchanged. After merging, comprehensive universities will have all kinds of departments and will look like mini-versions of National Taiwan University.
This is just what Ohmae described: a lot of national universities without their own characteristics, all waiting for their finances to implode.
At the moment, personnel costs accounts for more than 60 percent of a national universities’ expenditure. The future impact of the “low birthrate cliff” will be a decline in tax revenue and schools’ tuition revenue, resulting in the expenditure on personnel becoming an even heavier burden for the government.
The ministry should abolish its misguided policy based on how schools complement one another. Instead, the merging of national universities should be based on similarities between schools, with the primary goal being cutting personnel costs.
National universities that are similar in nature should merge and share their academic colleges.
To begin with, the number of faculties, staff and students would be doubled. The merged school should then leave vacancies unfilled, adjust employees’ duties and gradually lower admissions to reduce manpower by 5 percent each year. By doing so, the number of employees could be halved in 13 years and the number of faculties, staff and students would also be reduced to a normal size.
This form of merger would be in line with the declining population and could preserve universities with special characteristics, even reducing personnel costs by half. These savings could be used to improve the quality of teaching, research and services.
The policy of establishing more universities nationwide has lowered the standard of higher education, destroyed vocational education and caused an imbalance between supply and demand in the workplace as youth unemployment continues to rise.
In the face of the “low birthrate cliff” and its impact on higher education, it is time to start again. Hopefully, the new Cabinet can come up with a suitable university merger policy and consider the ratio of students in regular and vocational universities in the future to save the higher education system.
Kao Yi-hsuan is an associate professor in National Yang-Ming University’s Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking