At the beginning of this month, members of the public concerned about the monopolization of the media in Taiwan took to the streets of Taipei. More recently, people in Hong Kong staged street demonstrations and school strikes over the government’s planned introduction of “national education” patriotism courses. These protests occurred in two different geographical locations, over what on the surface appear to be different issues. However, what unites them are the concerns of the respective populations that the two events were the result of the handiwork of political forces operating in the background, with the intention of “brainwashing” or manipulating citizens.
In the past, within non-democratic societies, both the media and education system have been employed by the authorities as effective political tools to consolidate power and to suppress any form of democratic thought that people might have. They were also used as the means through which to “enlighten” their supporters and receptive citizens. The media, perceived as a source of information, was under the control of the authorities and was used by the powers-that-be to inform the public of what was deemed necessary or desirable for them to know.
School education, and in particular compulsory education, was used to inculcate ideas into people from an early age, in order to create an obedient citizenry that would constitute the next generation, sowing the seeds for consolidated rule in the long term.
Education provided in Japanese schools in Taiwan during World War II, by the government in Nazi Germany and by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during the Martial Law era in Taiwan, are classic examples of national education founded upon the specific political objective of manipulating the populace to further the political needs of the authorities.
After Taiwan became democratic, national education was all but divested of such negative connotations, for a time at least, but politics continues to taint what is taught in our schools, even as far up as higher education.
This is, at least in part, the reason for the ongoing dispute over the high school curriculum in Taiwan. We should bear this in mind when we empathize with the protests in Hong Kong against the introduction of patriotism classes, just as we should remind the protesters there to be mindful of the prodigious capacity of the media to brainwash them, too.
The Taipei Society supports the people in Hong Kong who are demanding a fully democratic system and who are concerned over attempts by the authorities to politicize the education taught to their children. We also call on the Taiwanese to be more aware of the same thing happening in our own education system, and what is taught within it, particularly with the proposed changes to the national curriculum and the content of the textbooks used, and of the manipulation by political forces that lie behind these changes. Of course, we also call on the Taiwanese to continue monitoring the problem in this country of the monopolization of the media by media moguls. We must remain vigilant at all times to these evils.
Chou Chih-hung is president of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS