At the beginning of this month, members of the public concerned about the monopolization of the media in Taiwan took to the streets of Taipei. More recently, people in Hong Kong staged street demonstrations and school strikes over the government’s planned introduction of “national education” patriotism courses. These protests occurred in two different geographical locations, over what on the surface appear to be different issues. However, what unites them are the concerns of the respective populations that the two events were the result of the handiwork of political forces operating in the background, with the intention of “brainwashing” or manipulating citizens.
In the past, within non-democratic societies, both the media and education system have been employed by the authorities as effective political tools to consolidate power and to suppress any form of democratic thought that people might have. They were also used as the means through which to “enlighten” their supporters and receptive citizens. The media, perceived as a source of information, was under the control of the authorities and was used by the powers-that-be to inform the public of what was deemed necessary or desirable for them to know.
School education, and in particular compulsory education, was used to inculcate ideas into people from an early age, in order to create an obedient citizenry that would constitute the next generation, sowing the seeds for consolidated rule in the long term.
Education provided in Japanese schools in Taiwan during World War II, by the government in Nazi Germany and by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during the Martial Law era in Taiwan, are classic examples of national education founded upon the specific political objective of manipulating the populace to further the political needs of the authorities.
After Taiwan became democratic, national education was all but divested of such negative connotations, for a time at least, but politics continues to taint what is taught in our schools, even as far up as higher education.
This is, at least in part, the reason for the ongoing dispute over the high school curriculum in Taiwan. We should bear this in mind when we empathize with the protests in Hong Kong against the introduction of patriotism classes, just as we should remind the protesters there to be mindful of the prodigious capacity of the media to brainwash them, too.
The Taipei Society supports the people in Hong Kong who are demanding a fully democratic system and who are concerned over attempts by the authorities to politicize the education taught to their children. We also call on the Taiwanese to be more aware of the same thing happening in our own education system, and what is taught within it, particularly with the proposed changes to the national curriculum and the content of the textbooks used, and of the manipulation by political forces that lie behind these changes. Of course, we also call on the Taiwanese to continue monitoring the problem in this country of the monopolization of the media by media moguls. We must remain vigilant at all times to these evils.
Chou Chih-hung is president of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS