At the beginning of this month, members of the public concerned about the monopolization of the media in Taiwan took to the streets of Taipei. More recently, people in Hong Kong staged street demonstrations and school strikes over the government’s planned introduction of “national education” patriotism courses. These protests occurred in two different geographical locations, over what on the surface appear to be different issues. However, what unites them are the concerns of the respective populations that the two events were the result of the handiwork of political forces operating in the background, with the intention of “brainwashing” or manipulating citizens.
In the past, within non-democratic societies, both the media and education system have been employed by the authorities as effective political tools to consolidate power and to suppress any form of democratic thought that people might have. They were also used as the means through which to “enlighten” their supporters and receptive citizens. The media, perceived as a source of information, was under the control of the authorities and was used by the powers-that-be to inform the public of what was deemed necessary or desirable for them to know.
School education, and in particular compulsory education, was used to inculcate ideas into people from an early age, in order to create an obedient citizenry that would constitute the next generation, sowing the seeds for consolidated rule in the long term.
Education provided in Japanese schools in Taiwan during World War II, by the government in Nazi Germany and by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) during the Martial Law era in Taiwan, are classic examples of national education founded upon the specific political objective of manipulating the populace to further the political needs of the authorities.
After Taiwan became democratic, national education was all but divested of such negative connotations, for a time at least, but politics continues to taint what is taught in our schools, even as far up as higher education.
This is, at least in part, the reason for the ongoing dispute over the high school curriculum in Taiwan. We should bear this in mind when we empathize with the protests in Hong Kong against the introduction of patriotism classes, just as we should remind the protesters there to be mindful of the prodigious capacity of the media to brainwash them, too.
The Taipei Society supports the people in Hong Kong who are demanding a fully democratic system and who are concerned over attempts by the authorities to politicize the education taught to their children. We also call on the Taiwanese to be more aware of the same thing happening in our own education system, and what is taught within it, particularly with the proposed changes to the national curriculum and the content of the textbooks used, and of the manipulation by political forces that lie behind these changes. Of course, we also call on the Taiwanese to continue monitoring the problem in this country of the monopolization of the media by media moguls. We must remain vigilant at all times to these evils.
Chou Chih-hung is president of the Taipei Society.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS