Coral reefs threatened
Thanks to the Taipei Times for publishing a front page article on Kenting’s coral (‘Disappearing coral reefs of Kenting,’ Sept. 12, page 1.)
Local divers have long lamented the changes in southern Taiwan’s underwater environment, with the most pronounced effects of overfishing and coral destruction topping their list of complaints.
The call for establishing a nature conservation area is surprising as Wanlitong coast and the Houbihu peninsula are already dotted with signs that warn of large fines for illegal fishing, water activities and the collection of coral from beach areas.
The main problem is enforcement, and until the local government steps up to the challenge of patrolling the area, continued damage will be done.
It is also important to distinguish between the different water activities and their impact: jet skis pollute the area by direct emissions; small sea craft rake the fragile coral with anchors and hoards of novice snorkelers tramp over the coral along the coastlines as unscrupulous tour groups try to make a quick buck.
Scuba divers on the other hand are for the most part trained to respect the aquatic environment with a “take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but bubbles,” mentality.
Though annual typhoons that sweep across the nation play a large part in the destruction of reefs near the surface, this is a natural process and corals can recover if the strains of human activity allow it to. So let us allow nature to take it’s course by devoting adequate marine conservation resources to protecting Kenting’s most precious resource.
Paul Oliver
Greater Kaohisung
Beware demand destruction
China’s leaders want to increase the level of personal discretionary spending to boost the consumption ratio in China’s GDP, a worthy goal. In the US, personal spending once reached 70 percent of GDP, a shockingly high percentage and a trend that will surely never return due to the ongoing destruction of the US dollar.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s leaders, politicians and judges — many of whom only claim to be Taiwanese — make a celebratory ritual out of stealing from the poor and laughing all the way to the bank while pretending to have competent ideas about improving Taiwan’s economy or returning the “ill gotten assets” to Taiwan’s treasury where they belong.
It is simple math, really. With the Post Office savings rate a little over 1 percent, and the inflation index, or CPI, at around 3 percent, Taiwanese who have been saving for decades are now finding that their wealth is dwindling during their retirement years while they watch their household expenses rise as they get older and require more personal care.
At the same time, certain Taiwanese special interest groups benefit from a government-guaranteed 18 percent interest rate on their savings, higher than any other investment return in the world. I was delighted when former candidate Democratic Progressive Party chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said she would abandon this unjust practice during her presidential campaign.
This special interest rate is absorbed into Taiwan’s national debt — which of course relies on our children’s as yet unearned wages to repay. It is quite an unfair system, even if you are one of the lucky few. In an environment where a workers’ savings are diminishing over time relative to inflation, it is hard to imagine that consumers will go running out on shopping sprees.
To ensure that a country’s citizens spend freely, it is necessary for the central bank to guarantee that savers’ long-accumulated wealth is not diminished over time. I would mandate that the interest rate on Post Office savings accounts be brought up to the level of the CPI. I would reduce this 18 percent preferential rate over three years, so that investors can carefully move their savings elsewhere.
Most of Taiwan’s TAIEX-traded companies pay dividends of around 5 percent annually, widely above the rate of inflation and the best bet is obviously Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (TSMC), the global leader in shrinking microchip geometry with the highest production volume — a “safe haven.”
Downside risks include all of TSMC’s facilities getting bombed into dust by some of the 1,600 missiles China has aimed at Taiwan, but if the People’s Liberation Army decides to launch all of them, there will not be much incentive for Taiwanese to hold savings at all, as most Taiwanese would likely die in the ensuing conflagration anyway.
All investors around the world want a safe haven for their paper-based, “fiat” currency because prices everywhere are going up all the time. I reiterate my recommendation on Commonwealth coins that are available at your corner jewelry shop, as I expect a doubling of the gold price within the next six months.
I repeat that this Year of the Dragon will involve an intense reversion to the mean.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS