Coral reefs threatened
Thanks to the Taipei Times for publishing a front page article on Kenting’s coral (‘Disappearing coral reefs of Kenting,’ Sept. 12, page 1.)
Local divers have long lamented the changes in southern Taiwan’s underwater environment, with the most pronounced effects of overfishing and coral destruction topping their list of complaints.
The call for establishing a nature conservation area is surprising as Wanlitong coast and the Houbihu peninsula are already dotted with signs that warn of large fines for illegal fishing, water activities and the collection of coral from beach areas.
The main problem is enforcement, and until the local government steps up to the challenge of patrolling the area, continued damage will be done.
It is also important to distinguish between the different water activities and their impact: jet skis pollute the area by direct emissions; small sea craft rake the fragile coral with anchors and hoards of novice snorkelers tramp over the coral along the coastlines as unscrupulous tour groups try to make a quick buck.
Scuba divers on the other hand are for the most part trained to respect the aquatic environment with a “take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but bubbles,” mentality.
Though annual typhoons that sweep across the nation play a large part in the destruction of reefs near the surface, this is a natural process and corals can recover if the strains of human activity allow it to. So let us allow nature to take it’s course by devoting adequate marine conservation resources to protecting Kenting’s most precious resource.
Paul Oliver
Greater Kaohisung
Beware demand destruction
China’s leaders want to increase the level of personal discretionary spending to boost the consumption ratio in China’s GDP, a worthy goal. In the US, personal spending once reached 70 percent of GDP, a shockingly high percentage and a trend that will surely never return due to the ongoing destruction of the US dollar.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s leaders, politicians and judges — many of whom only claim to be Taiwanese — make a celebratory ritual out of stealing from the poor and laughing all the way to the bank while pretending to have competent ideas about improving Taiwan’s economy or returning the “ill gotten assets” to Taiwan’s treasury where they belong.
It is simple math, really. With the Post Office savings rate a little over 1 percent, and the inflation index, or CPI, at around 3 percent, Taiwanese who have been saving for decades are now finding that their wealth is dwindling during their retirement years while they watch their household expenses rise as they get older and require more personal care.
At the same time, certain Taiwanese special interest groups benefit from a government-guaranteed 18 percent interest rate on their savings, higher than any other investment return in the world. I was delighted when former candidate Democratic Progressive Party chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said she would abandon this unjust practice during her presidential campaign.
This special interest rate is absorbed into Taiwan’s national debt — which of course relies on our children’s as yet unearned wages to repay. It is quite an unfair system, even if you are one of the lucky few. In an environment where a workers’ savings are diminishing over time relative to inflation, it is hard to imagine that consumers will go running out on shopping sprees.
To ensure that a country’s citizens spend freely, it is necessary for the central bank to guarantee that savers’ long-accumulated wealth is not diminished over time. I would mandate that the interest rate on Post Office savings accounts be brought up to the level of the CPI. I would reduce this 18 percent preferential rate over three years, so that investors can carefully move their savings elsewhere.
Most of Taiwan’s TAIEX-traded companies pay dividends of around 5 percent annually, widely above the rate of inflation and the best bet is obviously Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (TSMC), the global leader in shrinking microchip geometry with the highest production volume — a “safe haven.”
Downside risks include all of TSMC’s facilities getting bombed into dust by some of the 1,600 missiles China has aimed at Taiwan, but if the People’s Liberation Army decides to launch all of them, there will not be much incentive for Taiwanese to hold savings at all, as most Taiwanese would likely die in the ensuing conflagration anyway.
All investors around the world want a safe haven for their paper-based, “fiat” currency because prices everywhere are going up all the time. I reiterate my recommendation on Commonwealth coins that are available at your corner jewelry shop, as I expect a doubling of the gold price within the next six months.
I repeat that this Year of the Dragon will involve an intense reversion to the mean.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS