With a sprawling 20m2 campus, 10,000 students and state-of-the-art LCD projectors in its lecture rooms, Bansal Classes is bigger and slicker than most schools in India.
However, the institution, now a landmark in Kota, a city in the desert state of Rajasthan, is neither a school nor a college. It is the jewel in the crown of India’s private coaching industry, a US$6.4 billion business that exacerbates the country’s social divide.
Cram schools have become a magnet for tens of thousands of mostly middle class families in a country where two decades of rapid economic growth have failed to improve a dysfunctional state education system and a shortage of good universities.
Such cram schools coach students for fiercely competitive entrance tests to a handful of premier technical and medical colleges. Their modus operandi is rote learning. At Bansal’s, hundreds of teenagers are trained intensively to solve complex multiple-choice questions on physics, chemistry and mathematics.
Yash Raj Mishra, a Kota cram student, lives in a tiny room with no television or laptop and spends almost 16 hours a day attending classes, revising or tackling question papers.
“Physics is my first and last girlfriend,” said Mishra, leaning against a wall plastered with notes on Kinematics.
“I feel bad and frustrated when my friends score even slightly better than I do,” added the 17-year-old, who calls his friends only to ask about their academic progress.
Two-year coaching programs in Kota cost between US$3,000 and US$4,000, in addition to which students have to pay for their regular schools and the at least US$2,000 a year they must spend on accommodation. That makes the total expenditure for coaching programs a small fortune for most in a nation where the annual per capita income is around US$1,250.
“A child is a stack of thousand-rupee notes,” said Manoj Chauhan, a mathematics tutor in his late 20s who could have joined a software company or multinational firm, but chose instead to teach in Kota, where many teachers’ salaries top US$6,000 a month.
Such cram schools compound the inequalities of an education system plagued by absentee teachers and high drop-out rates, which have left one-quarter of Indians illiterate and lacking the skills to match the country’s growing economic needs.
A global survey by ManpowerGroup, one of the world’s largest staffing service providers, estimated India’s shortage of skilled labor at 67 percent — the second-worst in the world.
The skill shortages threaten to blunt what is seen as one of India’s biggest economic advantages: its demographic dividend.
With 60 percent of India’s 1.2 billion-strong population under the age of 35, the country has an opportunity to reap the kind of demographic dividend that brought the dramatic transformation of East Asian economies toward the end of the 20th century.
The average age of Indians in 2020 will be 29, compared with 37 in China and the US, and 48 in Japan, bringing a chance to boost productivity and the savings rate. However, India may never realize its dividend if the bulk of its youth are poorly educated, stuck in low-value jobs, or under-employed.
RITE OF PASSAGE
Every year, more than 50,000 students from all over India enroll in Kota, many of them under parental pressure. The riverside town has become the capital of the multibillion-dollar coaching industry, thanks to the success of Bansal Classes, which was set up by a former engineer who held the school’s first classes across the table in his dining room.
The city of nearly 1 million has flourished partly because of its blandness, with parents seeing the relative lack of distractions for students a bonus. Despite housing thousands of teenagers, it has hardly any of the shopping malls and cinema complexes that sprouted across India as its economy grew.
The goal of attending cram schools is cracking the tough exams set by top colleges such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) or the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), whose degrees can be a ticket to a lifetime of fat pay cheques or jobs in the US.
“There were 50 children who committed suicide in Kota last year,” said Vinod Kumar Bansal, the founder of Bansal Classes. “When a child realizes he can’t make it to IIT, the guilt of spending his father’s money on coaching can lead him to end his life.”
Bansal founded the school in the 1980s, leaving his job at a nylon-making firm after being diagnosed with muscular dystrophy, and it was his success that bred Kota’s coaching juggernaut.
The center shot to fame after a string of successes in getting students admitted to India’s toughest colleges — spawning a host of other institutions that were inspired by Bansal’s success. Its Web site says 16,000 of its students have gained admission to IITs, more than any other cram school.
This year, more than 500,000 students took the IIT entrance exam and less than 10,000 cleared it, making admission statistically harder than getting into America’s Ivy League colleges.
Today Bansal’s school, whose eight floors are connected by wheelchair ramps, has become a thriving business with annual earnings close to 1 billion rupees (US$18 million) — and that despite a sharp slowdown in India’s economic growth.
“In the long run, it has to undermine faith in the education system as a meritocratic system, where hard work and talent are rewarded,” said Chad Lykins, co-author of an Asian Development Bank report on private coaching in Asia. “Instead, the reward goes to the person who can go outside the system and get exam tricks and tips.”
Critics also argue that the cram schools offer false hope to many students and parents, promising results even though the candidate may not have an aptitude for engineering or medicine.
“Actually, in a coaching institute you are treated like a rat,” said Ashutosh Banerjee, who fled Kota within a month after getting fed up with his cram school. “Teachers have a lot of attitude and they shout at everyone and make fun of everyone.”
However, for most students, the teachers are above reproach and can become mini celebrities in Kota, where their pictures are plastered on city walls.
“On streets, students point at me or stare,” said Chauhan, the mathematics tutor, who has billboards with his picture around the city. “They have made videos [about me] and uploaded [them] on YouTube.”
RAT RACE
Seeing the potential in the Indian market, Etoos, a South Korean coaching giant, invested 300 million rupees to set up shop in Kota last year, focusing on video lectures and e-learning.
“In terms of revenue, India is going to cross over South Korea,” Etoos business head Nitin Chaturvedi said. “The Indian population is huge and geographically also it is 4 to 5 times of Korea.”
Coaching firms have flourished in other cities too. FIITJEE, a household name for would-be engineering students, has more than 60 franchises across the country. It plans an initial public offering in the next few months.
“People are chasing us like anything,” said R. Trikha, head of distance learning at FIITJEE. “Coaching is actually there because the school systems are not doing their job. Society should be grateful to us that we are fulfilling this need.”
However, the popularity of India’s cram schools has helped make a bad situation worse in the state education system. Better pay tempts schoolteachers to moonlight as private instructors, neglecting the poorer students they are meant to be teaching.
“It is forbidden, but enforcement is another issue,” Indian Ministry of Education secretary Anshu Vaish said. “Typically, what teachers do often is that they won’t teach in the classroom and they will make students come to their homes later to study the same thing.”
The poor quality of state teaching has resulted in a generation where about two-thirds of 10-year-olds cannot do a simple division problem, said Wilima Wadhwa of ASER, a Delhi-based education research center.
The experience in poorer schools can be bleak. Teacher truancy is common in most villages, while poverty can force families to pull children out of school early to find work. Pupils from lower castes face bullying and discrimination from their teachers, and are sometimes forced into doing menial jobs such as cleaning school toilets instead of attending classes.
The lack of good schools and colleges means that the quality of the average Indian degree is so low that even those students who manage to get one could find themselves without a job.
“Only 25 percent of our engineering graduates, on average, are actually fit to fulfill the requirements of the IT industry,” said Binod Khadria, a sociology professor at New Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University. “So you can imagine the amount of wastage. Those who are left over ... what are they going to do?”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS