With a sprawling 20m2 campus, 10,000 students and state-of-the-art LCD projectors in its lecture rooms, Bansal Classes is bigger and slicker than most schools in India.
However, the institution, now a landmark in Kota, a city in the desert state of Rajasthan, is neither a school nor a college. It is the jewel in the crown of India’s private coaching industry, a US$6.4 billion business that exacerbates the country’s social divide.
Cram schools have become a magnet for tens of thousands of mostly middle class families in a country where two decades of rapid economic growth have failed to improve a dysfunctional state education system and a shortage of good universities.
Such cram schools coach students for fiercely competitive entrance tests to a handful of premier technical and medical colleges. Their modus operandi is rote learning. At Bansal’s, hundreds of teenagers are trained intensively to solve complex multiple-choice questions on physics, chemistry and mathematics.
Yash Raj Mishra, a Kota cram student, lives in a tiny room with no television or laptop and spends almost 16 hours a day attending classes, revising or tackling question papers.
“Physics is my first and last girlfriend,” said Mishra, leaning against a wall plastered with notes on Kinematics.
“I feel bad and frustrated when my friends score even slightly better than I do,” added the 17-year-old, who calls his friends only to ask about their academic progress.
Two-year coaching programs in Kota cost between US$3,000 and US$4,000, in addition to which students have to pay for their regular schools and the at least US$2,000 a year they must spend on accommodation. That makes the total expenditure for coaching programs a small fortune for most in a nation where the annual per capita income is around US$1,250.
“A child is a stack of thousand-rupee notes,” said Manoj Chauhan, a mathematics tutor in his late 20s who could have joined a software company or multinational firm, but chose instead to teach in Kota, where many teachers’ salaries top US$6,000 a month.
Such cram schools compound the inequalities of an education system plagued by absentee teachers and high drop-out rates, which have left one-quarter of Indians illiterate and lacking the skills to match the country’s growing economic needs.
A global survey by ManpowerGroup, one of the world’s largest staffing service providers, estimated India’s shortage of skilled labor at 67 percent — the second-worst in the world.
The skill shortages threaten to blunt what is seen as one of India’s biggest economic advantages: its demographic dividend.
With 60 percent of India’s 1.2 billion-strong population under the age of 35, the country has an opportunity to reap the kind of demographic dividend that brought the dramatic transformation of East Asian economies toward the end of the 20th century.
The average age of Indians in 2020 will be 29, compared with 37 in China and the US, and 48 in Japan, bringing a chance to boost productivity and the savings rate. However, India may never realize its dividend if the bulk of its youth are poorly educated, stuck in low-value jobs, or under-employed.
RITE OF PASSAGE
Every year, more than 50,000 students from all over India enroll in Kota, many of them under parental pressure. The riverside town has become the capital of the multibillion-dollar coaching industry, thanks to the success of Bansal Classes, which was set up by a former engineer who held the school’s first classes across the table in his dining room.
The city of nearly 1 million has flourished partly because of its blandness, with parents seeing the relative lack of distractions for students a bonus. Despite housing thousands of teenagers, it has hardly any of the shopping malls and cinema complexes that sprouted across India as its economy grew.
The goal of attending cram schools is cracking the tough exams set by top colleges such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) or the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), whose degrees can be a ticket to a lifetime of fat pay cheques or jobs in the US.
“There were 50 children who committed suicide in Kota last year,” said Vinod Kumar Bansal, the founder of Bansal Classes. “When a child realizes he can’t make it to IIT, the guilt of spending his father’s money on coaching can lead him to end his life.”
Bansal founded the school in the 1980s, leaving his job at a nylon-making firm after being diagnosed with muscular dystrophy, and it was his success that bred Kota’s coaching juggernaut.
The center shot to fame after a string of successes in getting students admitted to India’s toughest colleges — spawning a host of other institutions that were inspired by Bansal’s success. Its Web site says 16,000 of its students have gained admission to IITs, more than any other cram school.
This year, more than 500,000 students took the IIT entrance exam and less than 10,000 cleared it, making admission statistically harder than getting into America’s Ivy League colleges.
Today Bansal’s school, whose eight floors are connected by wheelchair ramps, has become a thriving business with annual earnings close to 1 billion rupees (US$18 million) — and that despite a sharp slowdown in India’s economic growth.
“In the long run, it has to undermine faith in the education system as a meritocratic system, where hard work and talent are rewarded,” said Chad Lykins, co-author of an Asian Development Bank report on private coaching in Asia. “Instead, the reward goes to the person who can go outside the system and get exam tricks and tips.”
Critics also argue that the cram schools offer false hope to many students and parents, promising results even though the candidate may not have an aptitude for engineering or medicine.
“Actually, in a coaching institute you are treated like a rat,” said Ashutosh Banerjee, who fled Kota within a month after getting fed up with his cram school. “Teachers have a lot of attitude and they shout at everyone and make fun of everyone.”
However, for most students, the teachers are above reproach and can become mini celebrities in Kota, where their pictures are plastered on city walls.
“On streets, students point at me or stare,” said Chauhan, the mathematics tutor, who has billboards with his picture around the city. “They have made videos [about me] and uploaded [them] on YouTube.”
RAT RACE
Seeing the potential in the Indian market, Etoos, a South Korean coaching giant, invested 300 million rupees to set up shop in Kota last year, focusing on video lectures and e-learning.
“In terms of revenue, India is going to cross over South Korea,” Etoos business head Nitin Chaturvedi said. “The Indian population is huge and geographically also it is 4 to 5 times of Korea.”
Coaching firms have flourished in other cities too. FIITJEE, a household name for would-be engineering students, has more than 60 franchises across the country. It plans an initial public offering in the next few months.
“People are chasing us like anything,” said R. Trikha, head of distance learning at FIITJEE. “Coaching is actually there because the school systems are not doing their job. Society should be grateful to us that we are fulfilling this need.”
However, the popularity of India’s cram schools has helped make a bad situation worse in the state education system. Better pay tempts schoolteachers to moonlight as private instructors, neglecting the poorer students they are meant to be teaching.
“It is forbidden, but enforcement is another issue,” Indian Ministry of Education secretary Anshu Vaish said. “Typically, what teachers do often is that they won’t teach in the classroom and they will make students come to their homes later to study the same thing.”
The poor quality of state teaching has resulted in a generation where about two-thirds of 10-year-olds cannot do a simple division problem, said Wilima Wadhwa of ASER, a Delhi-based education research center.
The experience in poorer schools can be bleak. Teacher truancy is common in most villages, while poverty can force families to pull children out of school early to find work. Pupils from lower castes face bullying and discrimination from their teachers, and are sometimes forced into doing menial jobs such as cleaning school toilets instead of attending classes.
The lack of good schools and colleges means that the quality of the average Indian degree is so low that even those students who manage to get one could find themselves without a job.
“Only 25 percent of our engineering graduates, on average, are actually fit to fulfill the requirements of the IT industry,” said Binod Khadria, a sociology professor at New Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University. “So you can imagine the amount of wastage. Those who are left over ... what are they going to do?”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS