The death of Sun Myung Moon robs his Unification Church of the glue that sustained its global following as a cohesive religious and financial force even as membership dwindled from its 1980s peak, analysts say.
A messianic movement built on the rubble of the Korean War and exported to countries such as the US where it found favor with both conservatives and disaffected ex-hippies, the church now faces an uncertain future.
While it claims a worldwide following of three million, experts suggest the core membership is far smaller although it still carries a commercial clout that allows the church to punch way above its doctrinal weight.
The death of its charismatic founder on Monday at the age of 92 marks “an important turning point,” said Tark Ji-il, professor of theology at Busan Presbyterian University.
Without Moon’s unifying presence, Tark and others see potential for conflict between his sons who control the church’s religious and business arms and who do not command the same loyalty as their father from overseas chapters.
“The brothers have their own followers, and you can’t rule out the possibility that the church could end up divided depending on how they handle things,” Tark said.
While the media-coined “Moonie” moniker was intended to belittle, the fact remains that it was very much Moon’s church — founded, driven and maintained by the sheer force of his personality and the business acumen of loyal members.
Founded in 1954, a year after the Korean War, the church, like all new religious movements, initially struggled to assert itself against the establishment.
Mainstream Christian groups were particularly hostile, denouncing as heretical Moon’s claim to have been personally chosen by Jesus.
Moon’s survival strategy, according to Kim Heung-soo, professor of Korean Christianity at Mokwon University, was to avoid a doctrinal conflict and instead forge close ties with the military regime then ruling South Korea.
“One way he did this was by promoting anti-communism as one of the church’s major creeds,” Kim said.
“He used the same strategy when he moved to the US. He was a vocal proponent of the Vietnam War, hailing it as the war against communists, and publicly supported President Nixon during the Watergate scandal,” he added.
The timing of the church’s expansion to the US — Moon moved there in 1972 — was fortuitous for its growth, according to David Bromley, professor of religious studies at Virginia Commonwealth University
“The counter-culture was breaking up, the Vietnam War was winding down and there were people spilling out of a variety of movements and looking for new options,” Bromley said.
Rapid recruitment saw the church’s membership swell from an initial group of 100 missionaries to around 10,000 in just a few years.
However, Bromley believes the church’s influence was exaggerated, partly as a result of Moon’s high-profile courtship of senior US political figures and also the accusations of widespread brainwashing leveled by the church’s opponents.
“The church claimed large numbers of members and opponents also came out with huge estimates because that made it seem more dangerous,” Bromley said. “At one point, people were convinced there was a Moonie under every blanket, which obviously wasn’t the case.”
Where Moon’s church had a real advantage was its cultivation of business-minded members — particularly in the US and Japan — who helped build it into a multi-billion dollar commercial empire.
“It quickly became a business organization as much as a religious one,” Tark said.
Towards the end of the 1980s, membership began to fall off as the result of various scandals and political and social changes in South Korea and elsewhere that clipped Moon’s influence.
“I believe that what really sustains the church now is cash from the Japanese faithful,” said Tark, who, like numerous other experts, believes Moon’s most enduring legacy will be commercial rather than religious.
“The problem with that, of course, is that the business doesn’t need the church,” Bromley said.
“Before, the glue holding the global movement together was Moon with all the national chapters owing him tributes,” he added. “Now it’s divided among his children. Will Japanese members continue to throw money to his sons, or will the national groups go their own way, or collapse, or split? We really don’t know.”
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS