Gathered in a hall in the city of Osaka, about 900 students at Toru Hashimoto’s school for candidates listen raptly as the populist mayor Hashimoto issues a clarion call to shake up Japan’s deadlocked politics in an election that could come this year.
“It means nothing if you do not win. I don’t know when it will be, but everyone, get ready,” said a shirt-sleeved Hashimoto, wrapping up a speech in which he blasted mainstream parties, chided the media and pledged to speak for a silent majority.
“Become warriors. Let’s fight together. Let’s change Japan,” he said.
Illustration: Yuaha
Detractors call the boyish-faced Hashimoto a dangerous, right-wing populist who targets unpopular groups such as overpaid civil servants, tattoo-sporting city workers and electric power companies discredited by the Fukushima nuclear crisis, and bashes them to public applause.
Fans argue his brand of strong leadership is what Japan needs to break out of decades of policy impasse that last month prompted rating agency Fitch to downgrade its credit status.
Either way, Hashimoto’s ability to tap voter discontent far beyond the western city of Osaka means the former lawyer and TV talk show celebrity has the potential to shake up Japan with far-reaching results for the world’s third-biggest economy and its neighbors.
“People in Tokyo thought he was just an Osaka phenomenon, but that is changing,” said Kunio Hiramatsu, the former mayor of Osaka easily defeated by Hashimoto last year. “If they run 200 candidates in the next election, I think they could win a substantial number.”
Hashimoto’s plan is for the best and brightest of the students at his cram school for candidates to join more experienced allies to run in a national election that must be held by August next year but could come sooner.
SENSE OF DEADLOCK
Hashimoto’s stronghold is in Osaka, Japan’s second-largest, but declining metropolitan area, where business executives dream of reviving past commercial glories.
After resigning as governor of Osaka Prefecture last year, he won a landslide victory to become city mayor on a platform attacking scandal-tainted civil servants while promising to unify city and prefecture governments to eradicate duplication and cut wasteful spending.
“In a situation where people felt a sense of deadlock over a stagnant economy, deflation, a lack of jobs or stalled income and wanted to change something, Hashimoto’s easy-to-understand call for change resonated in people’s hearts,” said Akira Yanagimoto, a city assembly member from the rival Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and no fan of the mayor.
With memories of Japan’s military aggression in the 1930s and 1940s still raw, even some conservative critics find Hashimoto’s tactics disturbing. Others worry about what they see as an authoritarian streak.
“Right now, he is fashioning domestic enemies — those in the minority and ‘vested interests,’” Yanagimoto said. “But I worry that if he goes on the national stage, foreign companies or even foreign countries could become the ‘enemies.’”
Some backers acknowledge that propelling Hashimoto, 42, to the nation’s top job, prime minister, would carry risks, but argue that Japan’s prolonged stagnation makes drastic action vital.
“Frankly, I do feel some sense of danger, but I am more worried about the situation now,” said Shimpei Fukuda, 36, a former aide to a ruling party member of parliament and a student at Hashimoto’s school. “The only option is change.”
Clearly, there is a deep well of disillusion to tap. Nearly 80 percent of Japanese are dissatisfied with the way things are going in their country, while 86 percent said the government is having a bad influence, according to a recent survey by the Washington-based Pew Research Center.
That sort of discontent helped sweep the novice Democratic Party of Japan to power in 2009 with promises to take control of policy-making away from bureaucrats and pay more heed to consumers and workers rather than big corporations.
Three years and three prime ministers later, the Democrats look set to split after cutting a deal with the opposition to raise Japan’s sales tax to curb ballooning debt, a move critics inside and outside the party, including Hashimoto, say violates its 2009 campaign pledges.
RIGHT-WING ALLIES
Hashimoto could also be well placed to take advantage of fears that political paralysis is keeping Japan from competing successfully with China and South Korea.
“While Japanese politics is in great confusion over the sales tax, neighboring countries are ready to pounce,” Hashimoto said in his speech. “They are aiming at Japan’s weakness.”
The policies of Hashimoto’s Osaka-based Ishin no Kai (Restoration Group) are a work in progress, not least when it comes to diplomacy and defense. An eight-point policy plan calls for supporting the US-Japan security treaty and joining a US-led free-trade pact.
Still, even some conservatives worry his allies and advisers could push him toward right-wing positions that could upset China and other neighboring countries. Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara, for one, is well known for remarks that upset China.
His insistence that public school teachers sing the national anthem — for some still a symbol of pre-war militarism — at ceremonies and a ban on city workers having tattoos, long associated with yakuza gangsters, upset liberals.
“He is a kind of nationalist but not extreme,” said Shinichi Kitaoka of the Institute for International Policy Studies.
“But he is still surrounded by more hawkish people,” added Kitaoka, who said he had lectured at Hashimoto’s school to prevent a “right-wing coalition from happening.”
DO-IT-YOURSELF
On the economic front, Hashimoto’s stance — like his talent for punchy remarks in front of the television cameras — echoes that of the popular Junichiro Koizumi, who promoted privatization, competition and deregulation during his 2001 to 2006 stint as prime minister.
He also wants to create regional blocs that can collect their own taxes and set spending priorities while leaving diplomacy and defense to the central government.
Some say Hashimoto’s own background — he was raised in a poor family by a single mother, but went on to prestigious Waseda University and became a lawyer — has formed his policy stance.
Hashimoto grew up in an Osaka buraku community, home to members of an invisible minority racially and ethnically indistinguishable from fellow Japanese, but long the target of discrimination rooted in ancient religious concepts.
Those who know him say he does not identify with the group or back the idea of special financial help for its members.
“His view is that one can succeed through one’s own efforts and competition,” said Yuji Yoshitomi, a journalist who has written a book about Hashimoto.
The platform of Hashimoto’s Ishin no Kai group includes radical reforms such as abolishing the upper house, whose ability to block legislation in a divided parliament has been one reason for political stalemate, and the direct election of the prime minister by voters rather than by parliament. Both innovations would require hard-to-achieve constitutional reform.
Hashimoto adopted an anti-nuclear stance after last year’s disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. However, he softened his opposition to restarting two reactors after lobbying by business groups about the dangers of blackouts.
The party itself favors less reliance on nuclear power, but is not calling for a complete exit, said Hitoshi Asada, its policy chief.
“We are not saying, like Merkel, that after 20 years there should be no nuclear power,” he said, referring to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose country is phasing out nuclear power.
Whether Hashimoto himself will take a shot at parliament, a pre-requisite to becoming prime minister, is unclear. Some say it would be tough for him to quit as mayor mid-stream. Others argue that, ultimately, he will not be able to resist.
Politicians and experts say Ishin no Kai and its allies could well garner enough to play a key role in the formation of a new coalition government.
“I think what he is hoping for is to become the most visible and most popular so that when his small group goes national, he’ll be seen as the person who can galvanize these disparate groups or link them together,” said Andrew Horvat, director of the Stanford Center in Kyoto.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of