Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has made a rare political intervention to call on British Minister of Home Affairs Theresa May to stop the extradition of British student Richard O’Dwyer to the US for alleged copyright offenses.
Launching an online campaign, Wales said O’Dwyer, 24, was the “human face” of a global battle over the interests of the film and TV industries and the wider public, which came to a head in the global outcry against proposed US legislation laws the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT Intellectual Property Act (PIPA), which, if passed by the US Congress, would crack down on copyright infringement.
O’Dwyer, a multimedia student at Sheffield Hallam University in northern England, faces up to 10 years in a US prison for founding TVShack.net, a crowdsourced site linking to places to watch full TV shows and movies online.
“When I met Richard, he struck me as a clean-cut, geeky kid. Still a university student, he is precisely the kind of person we can imagine launching the next big thing on the Internet,” Wales said in a comment article for the Guardian.
“Given the thin case against him, it is an outrage that he is being extradited to the US to face felony charges for something that he is not being prosecuted for here. No US citizen has ever been brought to the UK for alleged criminal activity that took place on US soil,” Wales said.
“From the beginning of the Internet, we have seen a struggle between the interests of the ‘content industry’ and the interests of the general public. Due to heavy lobbying and much money lavished on politicians, until very recently the content industry has won every battle,” he added.
“We, the users of the Internet, handed them their first major defeat earlier this year with the epic SOPA/PIPA protests, which culminated in a widespread Internet blackout and 10 million people contacting the US Congress to voice their opposition. Together, we won the battle against SOPA and PIPA. Together, we can win this one, too,” Wales said.
Wales was at the forefront of the campaign against the SOPA and PIPA bills aimed at enforcing online copyright more vigorously, which many warned would threaten sites at the core of the Internet: Google, Wikipedia and others. With other senior editors, Wales set aside for the first time Wikipedia’s vaunted principle of neutrality, blacking out the online encyclopedia for a day as a warning of the consequences of too-strict copyright enforcement.
On Saturday, he launched a petition on change.org, an international campaigning Web site which garnered 2.2 million signatures for a campaign to prosecute the killer of Trayvon Martin in the US.
Wales’ petition called on May to stop O’Dwyer’s extradition. Under UK law, May must grant permission for extraditions to proceed, so she is able to stop extraditions without recourse to the courts.
O’Dwyer’s cause has already attracted cross-party support in the UK from prominent MPs, including Liberal Democrats President Tim Farron, the chair of the home affairs select committee, Keith Vaz, and liberal Conservatives such as David Davis and Dominic Raab.
Other US extraditions, such as those of alleged computer hacker Gary McKinnon and the NatWest Three, have led to calls for reform of the US/UK extradition treaty.
O’Dwyer was arrested by City of London police, accompanied by US customs officials, in November 2010. Six months later, he was told the UK investigation into him would not be pursued, but that he faced extradition to the US.
He faces two charges of copyright infringement and conspiracy to commit copyright infringement, each carrying a maximum of five years in prison. Under UK law, the comparable offenses carry a maximum sentence of six months.
O’Dwyer told the Guardian of his efforts to ignore his potential fate in order to try to complete his degree.
“It does get in the way, it distracts you ... if you thought about extradition all day, you’d never get any work done,” he said. “I think about it sometimes during the day, but I try to think about things that are more important. Otherwise you’d fail university, just sit in your room all day moaning. They’d be winning if I let it do that.”
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system