“Every day I ask myself, what is safe to eat? The pork is laced with clenbuterol; the beef and lamb contain other toxic additives; and we don’t dare drink the milk,” the post reads.
For most Chinese, living in a healthy manner is not just common sense, but a form of piety. If you fall sick, it is widely assumed it is because you did not really take care of yourself. However, as the lament above — posted on microblogging site Sina Weibo under the pseudonym “White clouds, Calm wind” — suggests, this ancient precept did not anticipate the advent of melamine, cadmium, pesticides, lead, mercury, sulphur dioxide, micro-particles and dozens of other potentially harmful chemicals that have worked their way into China’s food chain, water supply and atmosphere.
Nearly three decades of double-digit industrial development greased by corruption and barely constrained by regulatory oversight has produced, as a by-product, unprecedented levels of pollution and an epidemic of toxic foodstuffs — from baby formula to the grain alcohol favored at wedding banquets, made and marketed by ruthless entrepreneurs.
Many of the thousands of small-scale public protests across China each year are driven by the visible impact of environmental pollution on people’s daily lives, watchdog groups within and outside the country say. Until recently, such outbursts never garnered attention beyond the immediate zone of impact. However, the Internet, and especially homegrown microblogging sites with about 600 million accounts, means the state can no longer keep such incidents from becoming household knowledge across China.
Dozens of food and beverage scandals resulting in hundreds of deaths have made Chinese consumers wary, apprehensive and finally angry. From 2007 until last year, the use of clenbuterol, for example, flourished in factory pig farms across the country. A dangerous anabolic steroid, the chemical is also abused by athletes to build muscle mass. In animal husbandry, it increases the ratio of more expensive lean meat compared with fat.
Nitrogen-based melamine, a compound found in industrial plastics, was widely used in baby formula up until 2008, when the worst food scandal to hit China in years erupted into international news. Six infants died that year from poisoning, and an estimated 300,000 are still suffering health problems, especially kidney dysfunction. Despite the arrest of 21 people — two of whom were executed — a similar case emerged two years later, in 2010.
White Clouds, Calm Wind’s litany of alimentary anxiety also includes a fear of “talc in our tofu,” a staple source of protein consumed throughout China.
“And we can’t eat fried food either, because who can guarantee that it wasn’t cooked in recycled oil taken from the streets?” the post read.
At the end of last year, more than four dozen people were arrested in one province alone for reselling so-called “gutter oil” scooped up from the drains of restaurants.
“As for flour, it’s so unnaturally white that it’s frightening,” the blogger says.
Tainted food might be the least of China’s health hazards — it is still easier for the government to crack down on unscrupulous merchants than to purify China’s water and air. Just this year, there have been two major chemical discharges in life-giving rivers that have sent people scurrying to the supermarket.
In January, multiple factories upstream along a 300km stretch of the Longjiang River from the city of Liujiang were found to be dumping huge amounts of the deadly carcinogen cadmium. About 4 million people were affected.
Weeks later, an acid spilled in the Yangtze River at Zhejiang, one of the country’s wealthiest provinces, provoked a short-lived panic when residents in Zhenjiang City smelled the results in their tap water.
However, many consumers will have wondered if the water that disappeared from market shelves is necessarily safer. Only last year, Beijing authorities halted the sale of 31 brands of bottled water that failed safety tests. Many harbored colonies of bacteria that was hundreds — and in one case 9,000 — times above threshold standards.
The same goes for ostensibly certified “organic” foods, a sector that has nearly quadrupled in size in as many years as middle-class consumers look for guarantees that what they are eating is free of unsafe levels of pesticides.
Only China’s top leaders, provisioned from special farms, can be sure they are eating safely, according to Gao Zhiyong (高志勇), who worked for a state-run food company and then wrote a book about it. China’s Environmental Protection Ministry said in November last year that fully a tenth of China’s farmland contains dangerous levels of heavy metals due to contaminated water and waste.
“The folks at the State Administration for Radio, Film and Television [which oversees censorship] should be responsible for food safety and those at the State Food and Drug Administration in charge of reviewing movies,” another Weibo blogger quipped under the handle “Refugee.” “That way, Chinese people could eat safe food and see uncut movies.”
In August last year, thousands of residents in Dalian took to the streets to protest against the presence and alleged leaks from a factory producing paraxylene, a carcinogen used to make polyester films and fabric. Even Apple has come under fire. The Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, a Chinese research group, charged recently that some of the high-tech giant’s suppliers in China were spewing toxic substances into the water and the air, endangering their workers and neighborhoods.
About the same time, violent protests erupted in Haining, where residents, including the mayor, blamed a rash of leukemia cases on discharges from a nearby solar panel factory, forcing authorities to temporarily shut it down.
Reports of abnormally high rates of cancer near industrial installations have become so common that a new term has entered the vocabulary: “Ai Zheng Cun,” or “cancer villages.” With unintended irony, the Environment Office in Shandong Province recently anointed one such locale, Tushan, as a “commune of longevity” despite a rash of cancer that some experts suspect is related to a high concentration of chemical factories, including one that produces the insecticide Profenofos.
The Chinese government has been reluctant to release complete nationwide figures on cancer rates, and even the ones they do might have underestimated the problem, environmentalists say. Rural inhabitants — heavily exposed to insecticides and herbicides used in agriculture — are often reluctant to seek hospital care for fear of burdening their families with out-of-pocket medical expenses.
Arguably, the most widespread and health-wrecking form of pollution in China today is neither in the soil nor the water, but in the air. Partly in response to a rising tide of public anger over pollution, the government recently set new air-quality standards, including for the first time particulates of less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter.
However, in doing so, it was forced to acknowledge that the new benchmark immediately puts two-thirds of China’s big cities in the red zone. And while in keeping with the WHO’s guidelines for lowering pollution levels in developing countries, the new standards are still more than three times higher than the body’s recommended threshold.
China’s increasingly toxic environment, combined with the viral-like spread of news across the country’s microblogging sites, has proven highly combustible. As once-isolated victims realize that the hyper-local threats to their health are in fact duplicated across the country, they have become more emboldened in their criticisms, and more insistent that action be taken.
“We have been living this for decades,” one Weibo blogger wrote under the handle of “Hebo HB.” “We only wish the government would not cheat us.”
“Sometimes, I suspect that what we are breathing isn’t air, but politics,” another user said.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the