At just under 6,000 words, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inauguration speech on Sunday was more than 2,000 words longer than the one he gave in 2008. This time, Ma allocated almost one-third of the speech to cross-strait relations and international participation.
The way the president talked about cross-strait relations and the future was very different from the way he talked about them in 2008. Reading between the lines, chances are high that cross-strait political talks will occur under a “one China” framework. As such, it looks as though the pressure China has exerted on Ma to enter into political talks is more than just a rumor.
While Ma reiterated the “three noes” policy of “no unification, no independence and no use of force,” he tried to avoid mentioning the so-called “1992 consensus” — the idea that there is “one China, with each side having its own interpretation” — which he stressed in his 2008 speech. Instead, he devoted a lot of time to explaining the idea of “one country two areas (一國兩區).”
Ma also requested that China pay attention to this issue and that further improvements be made on the basis of “mutual non-recognition of sovereignty and mutual non-denial of authority to govern.”
Even more importantly, Ma said that cross-strait relations have seen “unprecedented success in the areas of economics and trade, transportation, public health, culture, education, judicial assistance and financial services.” However, he also said that in the next four years, Taiwan and China have to “open up new areas of cooperation and continue working to consolidate peace, expand prosperity and deepen mutual trust.”
What do these “new areas” refer to? It would seem that the political arena is the only possible explanation.
We get a pretty clear picture if we put these two ideas together. Basically, as a result of the continued pressure China is exerting on Ma to enter into political talks, Ma gave Beijing a straight answer. And because entering into political talks quickly runs into the thorny issue of how each side is to define the cross-strait relationship, Ma has formulated the term “one country two areas,” thereby addressing Beijing’s demands for a “one China framework.” However, concerned that Beijing would not accept the idea of “one country, two areas” if the Republic of China (ROC) is part of the equation, Ma reminded China of the mutual non-recognition of sovereignty approach.
In his speech, Ma talked about military procurement and international participation, qualifying this by saying that any weapons bought would be for defensive purposes only and would only be those that Taiwan is unable to manufacture itself. Previous remarks about taking part in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the International Civil Aviation Organization were replaced by talk about taking part in events related to these issues run by specific UN organizations. Ma also mentioned how Taiwan and China could demonstrate mutual tolerance and assist each other at events operated by international non-governmental organizations.
All these statements have a strong pro-“one China” connotation and are a proclamation to the international community that Taiwan is giving up its independence.
Ma has already sent a clear message to Beijing that he is willing to enter into political talks under its “one China” framework. Ma’s inauguration speech was one in which he essentially offered Taiwan on a silver platter to China. This is something Taiwanese need to be aware of.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS