Given that we are living in what should be an age of gender equality, the ratio of men to women should be 1:1. Now, is this the way things are naturally, or is it a reflection of human imagination? According to the Bureau of Health Promotion (BHP), the male to female birth ratio should be below 1.06:1. Is this correct? If the ratio is above that figure, then does that mean that more female fetuses are being aborted? This is clearly what the BHP thinks, because last week it announced that the number of newborns had greatly increased, reaching more than 71,000 between January and last month. Also, worryingly, the gender ratio was 1.074:1 and it suspected this imbalance was because 468 abortions of female fetuses had been carried out.
Over the past few years, the BHP has often talked about the imbalance in Taiwan’s gender ratio and it has even issued documents prohibiting obstetricians from informing pregnant women of the sex of their fetus. It was only public anger that prompted the bureau to declare it had issued the wrong documents.
Apart from the BHP constantly using administrative orders to threaten doctors and pregnant women, the legislature has amended the law by banning abortions based on the sex of the fetus. The bureau says that between 4,000 and 5,000 female fetuses are aborted in Taiwan annually, but to this day not one case has officially been found. Even more laughable is that when the gender ratio dropped from 1.09:1 to 1.079:1 last year, the BHP proudly announced that it had saved the lives of 993 female infants by launching a Year of the Dragon movement to save female fetuses.
There has been quite a lot of research conducted on the human gender ratio. Mortality rates are higher for men than for women in all age groups, largely because more men die as a result of murder, war and accidents than their female counterparts.
The scientist Dame Jane Goodall observed that young male chimpanzees living in the wild fall out of trees four times more often than females, and within the human species, more boys than girls end up in emergency rooms. In the US, six times more men are involved in murders than women, while 3.5 times more men die in accidents than women. As a result, the proportion of women to men tends to increase with age. In Germany, for example, the male to female gender ratio for those aged over 65 is 0.7:1 and in the US it is 0.72:1.
The current global gender ratio is 1.01:1 and that is also what statistics from the Ministry of the Interior show. Most data on the gender ratio come from the US’ CIA and from the UN. Wikipedia also hosts some information on the topic. There are also big differences in the kind of information available on the gender ratio and such data must be checked to avoid any misinterpretations.
According to US data for the years 1970 to 2002, the gender ratio also varied according to ethnicity. The ratio was 1.05:1 for Caucasians, 1.04:1 for Hispanics, 1.03:1 for African Americans and Indians and 1.07:1 for those of Chinese and Philippine ancestry. In Western Europe, statistics from 2001 showed that the ratio was 1.04:1 in Belgium and 1.07:1 in Switzerland, Portugal, Italy and Ireland. Another US study covering a 62-year period showed that the average gender ratio at birth was 1.06:1, but reached 1.07:1 for some age groups. It also showed that the rate can sometimes reach as high as 1.11:1 among those aged under 15 and over 40. This study also showed that in some years, the gender ratio at birth among those of Hawaiian, Philippine, Chinese, Japanese or Cuban ancestry can reach as high as 1.14:1.
Another study that spanned 138 years showed that the male-female ratio increases substantially during times of war and economic difficulty and that in warmer years, the gender ratio in Northern European nations increases markedly to 1.08:1. Research also shows that the gender ratio at birth in economically developed nations where gender selection is not practiced mostly range from 1.03:1 to 1.08:1, leading experts to the view that a gender ratio between these values should be viewed as normal.
Comparisons of different data reveal not insubstantial fluctuations in the gender ratio as a result of environmental, societal and economic factors. Climate, global warming and the latitude at which one resides, for example, play a role. Other variables are ethnicity, the uterine environment and whether it is the woman’s first pregnancy as well as the week of the pregnancy.
When the BHP said that 468 female fetuses must have been aborted because of the gender imbalance seen in recent births, it really went too far.
Chiang Sheng is an attending physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS