Given that we are living in what should be an age of gender equality, the ratio of men to women should be 1:1. Now, is this the way things are naturally, or is it a reflection of human imagination? According to the Bureau of Health Promotion (BHP), the male to female birth ratio should be below 1.06:1. Is this correct? If the ratio is above that figure, then does that mean that more female fetuses are being aborted? This is clearly what the BHP thinks, because last week it announced that the number of newborns had greatly increased, reaching more than 71,000 between January and last month. Also, worryingly, the gender ratio was 1.074:1 and it suspected this imbalance was because 468 abortions of female fetuses had been carried out.
Over the past few years, the BHP has often talked about the imbalance in Taiwan’s gender ratio and it has even issued documents prohibiting obstetricians from informing pregnant women of the sex of their fetus. It was only public anger that prompted the bureau to declare it had issued the wrong documents.
Apart from the BHP constantly using administrative orders to threaten doctors and pregnant women, the legislature has amended the law by banning abortions based on the sex of the fetus. The bureau says that between 4,000 and 5,000 female fetuses are aborted in Taiwan annually, but to this day not one case has officially been found. Even more laughable is that when the gender ratio dropped from 1.09:1 to 1.079:1 last year, the BHP proudly announced that it had saved the lives of 993 female infants by launching a Year of the Dragon movement to save female fetuses.
There has been quite a lot of research conducted on the human gender ratio. Mortality rates are higher for men than for women in all age groups, largely because more men die as a result of murder, war and accidents than their female counterparts.
The scientist Dame Jane Goodall observed that young male chimpanzees living in the wild fall out of trees four times more often than females, and within the human species, more boys than girls end up in emergency rooms. In the US, six times more men are involved in murders than women, while 3.5 times more men die in accidents than women. As a result, the proportion of women to men tends to increase with age. In Germany, for example, the male to female gender ratio for those aged over 65 is 0.7:1 and in the US it is 0.72:1.
The current global gender ratio is 1.01:1 and that is also what statistics from the Ministry of the Interior show. Most data on the gender ratio come from the US’ CIA and from the UN. Wikipedia also hosts some information on the topic. There are also big differences in the kind of information available on the gender ratio and such data must be checked to avoid any misinterpretations.
According to US data for the years 1970 to 2002, the gender ratio also varied according to ethnicity. The ratio was 1.05:1 for Caucasians, 1.04:1 for Hispanics, 1.03:1 for African Americans and Indians and 1.07:1 for those of Chinese and Philippine ancestry. In Western Europe, statistics from 2001 showed that the ratio was 1.04:1 in Belgium and 1.07:1 in Switzerland, Portugal, Italy and Ireland. Another US study covering a 62-year period showed that the average gender ratio at birth was 1.06:1, but reached 1.07:1 for some age groups. It also showed that the rate can sometimes reach as high as 1.11:1 among those aged under 15 and over 40. This study also showed that in some years, the gender ratio at birth among those of Hawaiian, Philippine, Chinese, Japanese or Cuban ancestry can reach as high as 1.14:1.
Another study that spanned 138 years showed that the male-female ratio increases substantially during times of war and economic difficulty and that in warmer years, the gender ratio in Northern European nations increases markedly to 1.08:1. Research also shows that the gender ratio at birth in economically developed nations where gender selection is not practiced mostly range from 1.03:1 to 1.08:1, leading experts to the view that a gender ratio between these values should be viewed as normal.
Comparisons of different data reveal not insubstantial fluctuations in the gender ratio as a result of environmental, societal and economic factors. Climate, global warming and the latitude at which one resides, for example, play a role. Other variables are ethnicity, the uterine environment and whether it is the woman’s first pregnancy as well as the week of the pregnancy.
When the BHP said that 468 female fetuses must have been aborted because of the gender imbalance seen in recent births, it really went too far.
Chiang Sheng is an attending physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS