For their meal tonight, Olinda Novela and her children will dine on tree root soup. This is what they ate for breakfast and what they will likely eat tomorrow. The soup, made from mashed wood shavings boiled in salty water, has zero nutritional value. It is a thin, brown, evil-looking gruel. However, in remote, drought-stricken Mahache village, about five hours’ drive north from Mozambique’s capital, Maputo, there is simply no other choice.
Novela, 37, has four children still at home; another four have moved away. They are not actually starving — not yet, anyway — but they are chronically malnourished, according to visiting community health workers.
They have much in common with many other Mozambican children, with an estimated 44 percent of under-fives physically or mentally impaired — the technical term is stunted — because of severe malnutrition. Their weakened immune systems increase their susceptibility to malaria, HIV and other fatal diseases.
“I am hungry. Everyone is hungry. I am hungry all the time,” Novela said, standing outside her crumbling home of mud walls, wooden stakes and corrugated iron. “I feel desperate. I don’t know what will happen to me and the children if it does not rain.”
She says there has been no fresh food in Mahache since January. Olinda hitches her youngest, Alissi, on her hip. Alissi looks about one year old. In fact, she is 21 months. Olinda’s son, Leonardo, is seven, but looks like a four-year-old.
The problem extends far beyond Mahache and its scale is daunting. Experts predict that in the next decade, there will be 4 million chronically malnourished children in Mozambique, which despite recent, rapid economic growth and the discovery of large natural gas deposits, remains one of the world’s poorest countries.
Globally, malnutrition is the key cause of the deaths of 2.6 million children each year. On present trends, the bodies and brains of an additional 450 million worldwide will fail to develop properly because of inadequate diet over the next 15 years, according to a report published by Save the Children in February.
G8 leaders including US President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron have a chance to act this week. Food security — meaning, broadly, the availability of food at all times — was high on the agenda at their annual summit at Camp David, Maryland, that began on Friday. Before the meeting, Obama unveiled a “new alliance” initiative involving selected African countries and private sector companies. The plan entails a US$1 billion, 10-year effort to lift 50 million people out of food poverty through increased investment in agricultural development.
Pre-summit draft consultation documents identify six sub-Saharan African states as “vanguard countries,” including Mozambique. The leaders of another three, Ethiopia, Ghana and Tanzania, whose good governance records are deemed to be better than others, have been invited by Obama to attend the summit. If the initiative flourishes, it will be extended to other countries.
“The G8 confirms the ultimate goals of improving agricultural productivity, economic growth, food security and nutritional status and recognizes and affirms the central role of women and smallholder farmers in achieving these objectives,” the document says.
“Malnutrition is a hidden problem, a hidden killer,” said Carina Hassane Ismael of the independent Food Security and Nutrition Association in Maputo. “It’s not like a famine. It can be hard to spot because the children are not actually starving.”
Increased food availability was not necessarily the solution, she said. Better food quality as well as quantity, a balanced diet, improved hygiene, stable food prices, nutrition education and the overcoming of food taboos — in parts of Mozambique, children and nursing mothers are denied eggs, an irreplaceable source of protein — were all essential to defeating the stunting epidemic, she said.
G8 action thus far has been spurred in part by the catastrophic drought and ensuing displacement and famine in east Africa and by dire warnings that a similar disaster is in the making this year in the western Sahel region, driven by high grain prices, environmental degradation and climate change. However, responses to these emergencies have increased concern that endemic, long-term problems such as chronic malnutrition are not being tackled with similar urgency and that promises to fund solutions will be broken.
“The G8 is always making plans, but they don’t implement them,” said Rafael Uaiene, assistant professor of international development with Michigan State University, who is based in Maputo and is a former director of Mozambique’s National Agricultural Research Institute. “The trouble is, millions of dollars are committed, but they never reach the ground in most cases.”
Critics point to the example of the G8’s L’Aquila summit in 2009, which saw US$6 billion in new money pledged for food security and agricultural initiatives over three years. By July last year, only 22 percent of the money had been spent.
“It is simply not acceptable for children to be eating roots to survive or to have only one meager meal a day. This G8 meeting must mark the beginning of the world’s biggest push to end hunger,” said Justin Forsyth, head of Save the Children. “In the past year, the G8 has played its part in dramatically reducing child deaths globally and it must continue in that vein by focusing resources on the battle against malnutrition and reducing the number of children who are stunted around the world.”
The aching despair felt by Olinda Novela might not be assuaged by the G8 declaration, but Mozambique’s experience also shows that intervention can help dramatically if those most in need can be identified and reached in time.
In Songuene village, near Guija in the Limpopo delta, Louisa, a 44-year-old mother of eight, said community health volunteers had helped her improve her children’s health. The volunteers are trained by Save the Children and equipped with motorcycle trail bikes to enable them to negotiate seemingly endless, sandy, unmade roads.
“My six-year-old, Miseria, was unwell. She had some cuts, but they did not heal, so I took her to the hospital,” Louisa said. “They told me Miseria was malnourished. The health worker taught me to make porridge including nuts and oil to make enriched food. She is healthy now. I take her for regular check-ups. I tell the other mothers, I am lucky to have a community volunteer as my neighbor.”
In this way, in theory, word spreads.
Marcela Libombo, national coordinator of the government’s food security and nutrition secretariat (SETSAN), said the government was implementing a new plan to address child malnutrition. SETSAN aims to bring down the proportion of under-fives who are stunted from 44 percent to 30 percent by 2015 and to 20 percent by 2020.
The plan identified vulnerable groups, such as young women and stipulated better education and training on nutrition for public and health workers, Libombo said. Mozambique’s efforts were supported by international non-governmental organizations and foreign governments, including the British Department for International Development.
“We are very optimistic. We are very positive about the G8,” Libombo said.
However, it was necessary to closely link summit initiatives to human development, she added.
“If you want to invest in the future, you need to talk about people,” she said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS