As President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) first term in office draws to a close, public resentment at his policies is being voiced from all quarters and his approval rating is lingering somewhere between 10 to 20 percent.
Last week the Chinese-language weekly The Journalist (新新聞) conducted a survey asking people which of the four presidents who have held office since the end of martial law had made the greatest contribution to the nation. Ma was at the bottom of the list, placed even lower than his predecessor Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who is languishing in prison after being convicted of corruption on Ma’s watch.
Four years ago, Ma was elected by a landslide 58 percent of the vote, but now he is perhaps the least popular head of state the nation has ever had. It takes a special kind of genius to achieve such a turnaround.
Maybe Ma feels so secure in his position that the way people rank him historically is of no concern to him and he will simply continue adding fuel to the fire. It may not matter to him, but the nation as a whole is suffering as a result of his bad leadership. It has to be said that Taiwanese chose the wrong president once and have now repeated the mistake.
Why is Ma getting pilloried? The short-term reason is the pain people are feeling as a result of a series of policy blunders his administration has made over the past few months. However, Ma’s incompetence and arrogance did not start yesterday. He has been responsible for innumerable policy failures ever since he was mayor of Taipei. While voters have given him their approval several times, the negative effects of his policies have made themselves felt more and more clearly after each successive election.
Such is the nature of democracy — you cast your vote and bear the consequences. Taiwan, however, is a country under threat of invasion by an enemy state. If we choose the wrong president, it could mean the end of Taiwan as we know it. The ultimate consequence of repeatedly choosing the wrong person to do the country’s most important job may be yet to come.
Although many celebrities and wealthy businesspeople who publicly supported Ma’s re-election bid are now saying they regret it, the sad thing is that what is done is done and there is little anyone can do to change it. Therein lies Taiwan’s biggest crisis.
The root of the problem is Ma’s predilection for surrounding himself with a handful of trusted appointees and forming policy behind closed doors.
Unfortunately, Ma’s most recent appointments indicate that he is set to go on doing things in the same old way. Although the public is seething over policies like permitting US beef containing ractopamine, introducing a capital gains tax on securities transactions and raising fuel and electricity prices, it has not been enough to cause Ma to change direction or adjust his policies.
Unlike the French and the Greeks, Taiwanese have not voted an unpopular leader out of office. The way an opposition motion to recall Ma was blocked in the legislature last week highlights the public’s frustration and helplessness. Knowing that we voted for the wrong person is worrying enough, but what is worse is that now we have no way of changing things, and this will lead to a host of problems.
Everyone knows that the man is no good. The first four years were pretty unbearable and now he has another four years in which to do more of the same.
The current wave of anti-Ma protests may not be enough to really change this unsatisfactory state of affairs, but one thing that is certain is that if no one takes to the street then there will definitely be no change for the better.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an advisor to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS