As President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) first term in office draws to a close, public resentment at his policies is being voiced from all quarters and his approval rating is lingering somewhere between 10 to 20 percent.
Last week the Chinese-language weekly The Journalist (新新聞) conducted a survey asking people which of the four presidents who have held office since the end of martial law had made the greatest contribution to the nation. Ma was at the bottom of the list, placed even lower than his predecessor Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who is languishing in prison after being convicted of corruption on Ma’s watch.
Four years ago, Ma was elected by a landslide 58 percent of the vote, but now he is perhaps the least popular head of state the nation has ever had. It takes a special kind of genius to achieve such a turnaround.
Maybe Ma feels so secure in his position that the way people rank him historically is of no concern to him and he will simply continue adding fuel to the fire. It may not matter to him, but the nation as a whole is suffering as a result of his bad leadership. It has to be said that Taiwanese chose the wrong president once and have now repeated the mistake.
Why is Ma getting pilloried? The short-term reason is the pain people are feeling as a result of a series of policy blunders his administration has made over the past few months. However, Ma’s incompetence and arrogance did not start yesterday. He has been responsible for innumerable policy failures ever since he was mayor of Taipei. While voters have given him their approval several times, the negative effects of his policies have made themselves felt more and more clearly after each successive election.
Such is the nature of democracy — you cast your vote and bear the consequences. Taiwan, however, is a country under threat of invasion by an enemy state. If we choose the wrong president, it could mean the end of Taiwan as we know it. The ultimate consequence of repeatedly choosing the wrong person to do the country’s most important job may be yet to come.
Although many celebrities and wealthy businesspeople who publicly supported Ma’s re-election bid are now saying they regret it, the sad thing is that what is done is done and there is little anyone can do to change it. Therein lies Taiwan’s biggest crisis.
The root of the problem is Ma’s predilection for surrounding himself with a handful of trusted appointees and forming policy behind closed doors.
Unfortunately, Ma’s most recent appointments indicate that he is set to go on doing things in the same old way. Although the public is seething over policies like permitting US beef containing ractopamine, introducing a capital gains tax on securities transactions and raising fuel and electricity prices, it has not been enough to cause Ma to change direction or adjust his policies.
Unlike the French and the Greeks, Taiwanese have not voted an unpopular leader out of office. The way an opposition motion to recall Ma was blocked in the legislature last week highlights the public’s frustration and helplessness. Knowing that we voted for the wrong person is worrying enough, but what is worse is that now we have no way of changing things, and this will lead to a host of problems.
Everyone knows that the man is no good. The first four years were pretty unbearable and now he has another four years in which to do more of the same.
The current wave of anti-Ma protests may not be enough to really change this unsatisfactory state of affairs, but one thing that is certain is that if no one takes to the street then there will definitely be no change for the better.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an advisor to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS