The government’s commodity price stabilization task force and Fair Trade Commission are trash. According to recent media reports, these two government bodies, which are tasked with tackling rising consumer prices, can both be discarded, precisely because they are virtually useless.
News that prices of freshly brewed coffee in Taiwan have risen by as much as 20 percent since the beginning of this year — in contrast to the price of coffee beans, which has dropped 22 percent over the same period — comes as little surprise. It is no wonder that people have found the news hard to swallow as they consider companies’ pricing calculations.
Meanwhile, wheat prices have fallen by as much as 11.4 percent this year on global markets because of the weakening world economy, but bread prices in Taiwan have failed to reflect the drop in costs. In fact, bread prices have increased by up to 22.2 percent. There have also been news reports highlighting that breakfasts served by local food vendors are increasingly being made with reduced portions of key ingredients, despite carrying the same price tag.
People have questioned whether costs are rising as much as companies are claiming and have accused food retailers of taking advantage of recent fuel price hikes and an impending electricity rate increase as an excuse to boost their revenues.
Lawmakers demanded that the government’s price stabilization task force conduct an investigation and ordered the Fair Trade Commission to check if basic commodity wholesalers were engaging in monopolistic practices, but guess what — the task force has said it needs time to understand the situation while the commission has said there are no regulations in the Fair Trade Act (公平交易法) allowing them to demand that retailers lower their prices.
To refute public criticism of its negligence of duty, the commission said in a statement on Friday that the Fair Trade Act was designed to regulate “restrictive competition practices.” The commission says its role is to ensure effective operation of market functions and added that it fined local businesses NT$500 million between August 2007 and May 6 of this year for activities that artificially manipulated the market.
All that aside, the commission has said that — based on the results of its latest round of inspections into retail prices — it found no concerted action by retailers to increase their prices.
Legally speaking, the commission’s explanation sounds reasonable. Unfortunately, its conclusions do not match the perceptions of many people who are now calling for a boycott of certain products to reflect their dissatisfaction with retailers. The failure of government bodies to report events in a way that tallies with public perceptions is just one of the many recent governmental messages that indicate it is ignoring them. All this will have serious implications for government accountability.
An example of how the public has demanded more meaningful economic data revolves around the consumer price index (CPI). The government’s statistics bureau recently reported the year-on-year growth in the CPI was 1.44 percent, but many people have questioned that figure and have asked whether the CPI really is a good measure of actual costs.
The accuracy of the CPI has a significant impact on the economy and is an important reference point for payment agreements that are pegged to inflation. Therefore, the government needs to look at the way it gathers its CPI statistics, because people feel they are losing out and want the government to adjust the key items it uses to calculate the figure.
A raft of recent policies have caused record levels of people to express dissatisfaction with both President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Cabinet, but if people have reached the point where they no longer believe economic data and are increasingly distrustful of both government and the law, then being labeled trash will be the least of the government’s troubles.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS