An elusive French architect is emerging as a key figure in China’s biggest political scandal in two decades, with evidence suggesting he shared both an affectionate and close business relationship with the Chinese woman at the heart of the scandal.
Patrick Henri Devillers, 52, is one of two Westerners in China known to have had close business ties to the family of deposed Chinese politician Bo Xilai (薄熙來), specifically with Bo’s wife, who is accused of murdering the other expatriate, Neil Heywood.
Until now, only Heywood was alleged to have had a close personal relationship with Bo’s glamorous wife, Gu Kailai (谷開來), a factor that has led Chinese police to treat his murder as one where intense feelings of betrayal played a part. Gu is alleged to have poisoned Heywood in November last year after a row over money.
However, one man who knew Heywood and Devillers during the pair’s association with the Bo family said Devillers had shown much more affection and intimacy toward Gu than Heywood had done, and that he had assumed Gu and the Frenchman were lovers.
“Heywood was an interesting and amusing character, [but] Devillers was the one who used to pat her on the back and put his arm around her in a restaurant. They were definitely, I would have said, an item,” British businessman Giles Hall said.
Hall had business dealings and socialized with Heywood, Devillers and Gu over a decade ago, mostly in Britain, where Bo’s wife was carrying out some business and her son was attending school. At the time, Bo was mayor of Dalian, in northeast China.
The suspicion Devillers had a romantic link with Gu — in addition to business ties — suggests the Frenchman could be more than a peripheral figure in the Bo scandal, details of which are sketchy. The police case against Gu has not been made public.
Devillers and Gu gave the same residential address when they set up a British company in 2000 — a top-story apartment in an office building in the faded resort town of Bournemouth. Some office workers inside the building said they remembered Gu from that time, but did not recall her having any male companions.
Devillers’ whereabouts are unknown. He declined to comment through his lawyer, Stephane Biver of the law firm Godfrey-Higuet, a specialist in international tax and finance law in Luxembourg.
His father and sister said they had had little or no contact with Devillers and did not know how to reach him.
Gu, a murder suspect, is under detention. Her husband has not made any public comments since March when he was sacked as party boss of China’s biggest municipality, Chongqing. Just before that, Bo accused his critics of pouring filth on him and his family.
Devillers’ father did not dismiss the suggestion that his son might have been sexually interested in Gu.
“It is possible, all the more since, according to the photos, she seemed attractive,” Michel Devillers said at his home in Rainans, a sleepy rural village in eastern France.
The Bo scandal is extraordinary on several levels, having brought down an ambitious high-ranking member of the Chinese Communist Party and ruffling a once-in-a-decade leadership transition in Beijing.
It has exposed the unusual extent to which an elite Communist Party family — Bo’s father was a revolutionary comrade of Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and Gu’s father a military hero — allowed foreigners so far into its inner circle and it raises questions about the family’s murky financial affairs.
Sources familiar with the police case against Gu say Heywood was helping the family move money offshore and that he was killed after threatening to expose her dealings.
Hall, who sold a hot-air balloon to Gu for promotional use over Dalian, said he had been asked by Bo’s wife to help in the illicit movement of £150,000 (US$240,000) offshore, a request Hall said he rejected.
Gu had suggested Hall’s firm should add the £150,000 to an invoice for the supply of a winch for the balloon and that his company should use this sum to pay the British school fees for her son, Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), Hall said.
He added that Gu withheld a final payment for the overall balloon deal after his refusal.
“The whiff of scandal associated to it, we couldn’t have it. That’s when we said: ‘No.’ She got very irked about it,” said Hall, who negotiated the balloon deal between 1998 and 2000.
Chinese citizens are only allowed to transfer US$50,000 out of the country each year. Police believe Gu was using Heywood to help skirt this restriction, sources have said, though evidence of this has yet to emerge.
Heywood’s widow has no knowledge of any such transactions, a family friend said.
“It’s a little out of the norm, but it could be quite useful to have an expat ‘Mr fixit’ who can move things around, cross borders and not be on the radar screen,” said Steve Vickers, head of business intelligence specialists Steve Vickers Associates, referring to a powerful Chinese political family allowing foreigners to become so close to its personal affairs.
One other foreign businessman was also close to the Bo family — Larry Cheng (程毅君), a Taiwanese-American who was Gu’s partner in her Horus Consulting business in Dalian.
Cheng later set up a new consulting business using the same Chinese name, with the financial help of Xu Ming (徐明), a plastics-to-property entrepreneur described by executives as Bo’s closest business ally.
Cheng, now based in Shanghai, said he had not worked with Gu since he left Dalian in 1999. Xu has been detained since the eve of Bo’s ouster for reasons that have not been made public.
Tall and always well-dressed, Devillers entered Bo’s inner circle while living in Dalian in the 1990s. A Chinese company had refused to pay the Frenchman for some architectural work, so he and his Chinese wife wrote a letter to the mayor’s office.
Then-mayor Bo Xilai intervened on Devillers’ behalf and later referred work to him. In 2000, Devillers returned to France, leaving his wife to care for her aged parents and young son. The couple divorced three years later.
His former wife, Guan Jie (關杰), who still lives in Dalian, said she could not believe Devillers had had a romance with Gu or had been involved in moving large sums of money offshore for her.
“Patrick wouldn’t have gotten mixed up with anything like this. He was a very straight person, very polite, very honest,” Guan said, adding she had lost contact with him since the divorce.
“He had a mental wall to block out anything bad. He didn’t like complicated things, society things,” she said.
Devillers’ sister also said she lost contact with him many years ago and had no idea of his whereabouts.
His only known business address suggests Gu may have known where to reach him until relatively recently.
In 2006, Devillers registered an investment firm, D2 Properties, in Luxembourg, using the Beijing address of the Ang Dao Law Firm — a firm affiliated with Gu, who had merged her own law practice with it. Staff at Ang Dao Law Firm, housed in a dingy office block not far from Beijing’s Olympic Stadium, declined to comment when asked about Devillers.
D2 Properties owns minority stakes in boutique property projects in France, Monaco, Martinique and Geneva developed by Devillers’ father, a real-estate investor. The father’s Rainans Investissements owns 2 percent of D2 Properties, according to a Rainans financial statement.
Before D2 Properties was formed, Gu and Devillers had been co-directors of a British-based firm, Adad Ltd. Registered in 2000 and dissolved in 2003, its business purpose was unclear.
Devillers’ paper trail shines little light on the extent of his business relationship with Gu, but Hall said the Frenchman had represented himself as a fixer in Europe for Gu, who used the name Horus in many of her dealings, Hall said.
“Without me, Horus is nothing,” Hall quoted Devillers as saying.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its