The proposed capital gains tax on securities transactions has caused all kinds of trouble for the government. Everyone, including investors, the Cabinet, the Presidential Office, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and opposition parties, have their own opinions on the issue.
The main arguments for levying such a tax are fairness and justice. While these are values we all believe in, they can also lead to disaster. When Marxism was first espoused, many embraced its supposed pursuit of justice and fairness, but the last century offers more than enough examples of how the pursuit of such lofty ideals brought disaster to millions of people, both those who lost their lives to communist tyrants or everyone else who ended up in poverty.
In the past, a capital gains tax on securities transactions might have been a good idea, but times have changed.
With the liberalization of capital flows, stock markets worldwide are increasingly linked and in order to spur market activity, governments started offering incentives to foreign investors and tax exemptions on futures trading. As a result, the principles of fairness and justice were quickly forgotten. This is especially true in Taiwan.
Beijing does not levy such a capital gains tax and while that certainly does stop the Ma administration from doing so, it is possible that insisting on the tax could have the same result as the communist pursuit of justice and fairness: everyone loses out.
Once those in power realize that times have changed, their tax reforms and theories will be revised accordingly. Tax on income is no longer levied on those who provide or create income, but on those who receive and benefit from that income.
Taxation should thus be based on the basic principle of taxing those who benefit from income, not those who create it. In other words, income gained from work or investment is a form of income creation and when necessary, the government should provide those who create income with investment incentives and deductions on income from interest.
At the same time, higher tax rates should be applied to those who use their income to purchase jewelry, luxury houses and yachts, or, in other words, those who profit from income.
While some view income derived from securities as a form of income gained without having to work, it remains a type of investment and income creation and it is therefore difficult to argue that offering incentives to encourage such activity is unfair.
This is especially true in Taiwan, where many industries have relocated to China. Despite this, the TAIEX has maintained a higher price-earnings ratio than many other Asian nations, which is why not levying this capital gains tax would help to promote the raising of capital in Taiwan.
Ma’s recent statement that he is serious about the capital gains tax on securities transactions clearly highlights the government’s ignorance and shows that it is living in the past by viewing capital gains tax exemptions as a sin. This is the same approach taken by the Chinese Communist Party when it took power 60 years ago and treated capitalists as immoral exploiters.
I am not saying that we should not have a capital gains tax on securities transactions; it is just that given the current situation, such a tax runs the risk of killing the goose that lays the golden egg. It would not only fail to raise revenue for the government, it would cause the price-earnings ratio to drop and undermine the market’s ability to attract capital.
These are things that will eventually affect all of us. However, if the government’s proposed capital gains tax is intended to force Taiwanese money into the Chinese market and speed up unification, then that’s a another story altogether.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS