In the run-up to the Jan. 14 presidential and legislative elections, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration did its best to keep clear of controversial policies, for fear that they could have a negative influence on Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the poll results. However, these issues are like a pressure cooker that has kept getting hotter all the time and now that the elections are over, they are bound to explode and come to the fore. The question of lean meat-enhancing agents and US beef is one of these political hot potatoes.
About 20 kinds of drug are classed as lean meat-enhancing agents. One of these is ractopamine, which in Taiwan is generally known by the brand name Paylean, under which it is sold as a feed additive for pigs. Ractopamine is the only lean meat-enhancing agent whose use is permitted by US authorities, because is it is generally considered to be less risky than other similar drugs.
The function of these chemicals is to reduce the amount of animal feed required and to increase the proportion of lean meat in the slaughtered animal. It is estimated that US livestock farmers make an extra US$10 for each pig they produce when they add Paylean to their feed, but the downside is that ractopamine may pose health risks to human beings, such as irregular heartbeat and heart attacks.
The EU, China and Japan do not permit the use of ractopamine or the sale of meat that tests positive for the drug. Apart from health concerns, these bans might also be a kind of trade barrier set up to protect pig farmers in those countries. Pig farmers’ associations in Taiwan are also opposed to permitting ractopamine in meat, for fear that allowing it would open the door to large-scale imports of US pork.
In 2007, the Department of Health (DOH) proposed a permitted level of ractopamine residue based on the standards set by Japan and the Joint FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), but this standard was never implemented because of controversy surrounding the issue. Ma has been in office since 2008, but in all this time Taiwan has not carried out its own assessment of the drug’s possible health risks and the doubts that were raised five years ago remain unresolved.
However, now the government seems intent on lifting the ban on ractopamine. We in the Democratic Progressive Party cannot help but ask whether the government thinks it has to do this to reward the US for comments favorable to Ma that some serving and former US officials made in the run-up to last month’s elections.
It should be noted that a study carried out by a group of professors at Iowa State University found that seven out of a group of nine greyhounds suffered serious damage to their hearts after having ractopamine added to their food. The results of the experiment were published in the journal Veterinary Pathology on Oct. 12 last year. If large dogs suffer such serious effects from ingesting the drug, can it really be harmless to humans?
Another point is that ractopamine tends to accumulate in animals’ hearts. People in other countries do not eat animal organs very much, so those countries have set relatively high permitted amounts for ractopamine residue. Taiwanese, on the other hand, are in the habit of eating a lot of animal organs, so the risk would be greater if the same high limits were accepted in this country.
According to insider information, when the Chinese authorities had informal negotiations with the US concerning leanness-promoting agents, they stated that they were taking into account the way Taiwan had handled the issue. With China using Taiwan as a shield, Taiwan has become a target for pressure from the US.
The EU can also be expected to exert pressure on Taiwan in the near future. The US, the Netherlands and some other countries have been taking measures to contain outbreaks of mad cow disease, but among these countries Taiwan only allows beef imports from the US. The Netherlands has tried hard to get access to the Taiwanese market, but is still shut out. Since last year, the EU and Schengen Area countries have allowed Republic of China (Taiwan) passport-holders to enter without visas.
Could this have something to do with an under-the-table deal for Taiwan to permit imports of beef from the Netherlands and other European countries? If so, it could pose a big risk to Taiwan, because there have been many more cases of mad cow disease in the Netherlands than in the US.
Now, former National Security Council secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起) is saying that his view of the matter is that resolving the US beef issue would help stabilize Taiwan-US relations. However, the DOH’s position on the issue should give top priority to any risks there might be to people’s health.
However, top health officials seem to have been more concerned about how the issue could affect the ruling party’s vote count. Thus they came up with a plan to allow ractopamine residue in imported beef, considering that there are not many cattle farmers in Taiwan, but not to allow it in pork, because there are a lot of pig farmers in this country.
Our advice to the Ma administration is that these issues should be approached based on health considerations alone. If a lot of political considerations are involved, Ma and his government may win some political support in the short term, but in the long run it is likely to do them more harm than good.
Lee Ying-yuan is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator-at-large.
Translated by JULIAN Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS