In the run-up to the Jan. 14 presidential and legislative elections, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration did its best to keep clear of controversial policies, for fear that they could have a negative influence on Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the poll results. However, these issues are like a pressure cooker that has kept getting hotter all the time and now that the elections are over, they are bound to explode and come to the fore. The question of lean meat-enhancing agents and US beef is one of these political hot potatoes.
About 20 kinds of drug are classed as lean meat-enhancing agents. One of these is ractopamine, which in Taiwan is generally known by the brand name Paylean, under which it is sold as a feed additive for pigs. Ractopamine is the only lean meat-enhancing agent whose use is permitted by US authorities, because is it is generally considered to be less risky than other similar drugs.
The function of these chemicals is to reduce the amount of animal feed required and to increase the proportion of lean meat in the slaughtered animal. It is estimated that US livestock farmers make an extra US$10 for each pig they produce when they add Paylean to their feed, but the downside is that ractopamine may pose health risks to human beings, such as irregular heartbeat and heart attacks.
The EU, China and Japan do not permit the use of ractopamine or the sale of meat that tests positive for the drug. Apart from health concerns, these bans might also be a kind of trade barrier set up to protect pig farmers in those countries. Pig farmers’ associations in Taiwan are also opposed to permitting ractopamine in meat, for fear that allowing it would open the door to large-scale imports of US pork.
In 2007, the Department of Health (DOH) proposed a permitted level of ractopamine residue based on the standards set by Japan and the Joint FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), but this standard was never implemented because of controversy surrounding the issue. Ma has been in office since 2008, but in all this time Taiwan has not carried out its own assessment of the drug’s possible health risks and the doubts that were raised five years ago remain unresolved.
However, now the government seems intent on lifting the ban on ractopamine. We in the Democratic Progressive Party cannot help but ask whether the government thinks it has to do this to reward the US for comments favorable to Ma that some serving and former US officials made in the run-up to last month’s elections.
It should be noted that a study carried out by a group of professors at Iowa State University found that seven out of a group of nine greyhounds suffered serious damage to their hearts after having ractopamine added to their food. The results of the experiment were published in the journal Veterinary Pathology on Oct. 12 last year. If large dogs suffer such serious effects from ingesting the drug, can it really be harmless to humans?
Another point is that ractopamine tends to accumulate in animals’ hearts. People in other countries do not eat animal organs very much, so those countries have set relatively high permitted amounts for ractopamine residue. Taiwanese, on the other hand, are in the habit of eating a lot of animal organs, so the risk would be greater if the same high limits were accepted in this country.
According to insider information, when the Chinese authorities had informal negotiations with the US concerning leanness-promoting agents, they stated that they were taking into account the way Taiwan had handled the issue. With China using Taiwan as a shield, Taiwan has become a target for pressure from the US.
The EU can also be expected to exert pressure on Taiwan in the near future. The US, the Netherlands and some other countries have been taking measures to contain outbreaks of mad cow disease, but among these countries Taiwan only allows beef imports from the US. The Netherlands has tried hard to get access to the Taiwanese market, but is still shut out. Since last year, the EU and Schengen Area countries have allowed Republic of China (Taiwan) passport-holders to enter without visas.
Could this have something to do with an under-the-table deal for Taiwan to permit imports of beef from the Netherlands and other European countries? If so, it could pose a big risk to Taiwan, because there have been many more cases of mad cow disease in the Netherlands than in the US.
Now, former National Security Council secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起) is saying that his view of the matter is that resolving the US beef issue would help stabilize Taiwan-US relations. However, the DOH’s position on the issue should give top priority to any risks there might be to people’s health.
However, top health officials seem to have been more concerned about how the issue could affect the ruling party’s vote count. Thus they came up with a plan to allow ractopamine residue in imported beef, considering that there are not many cattle farmers in Taiwan, but not to allow it in pork, because there are a lot of pig farmers in this country.
Our advice to the Ma administration is that these issues should be approached based on health considerations alone. If a lot of political considerations are involved, Ma and his government may win some political support in the short term, but in the long run it is likely to do them more harm than good.
Lee Ying-yuan is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator-at-large.
Translated by JULIAN Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS