It has been said by certain individuals in China that if every person there spat in unison they would be able to drown the whole of Taiwan in spittle. Not a nice image — not least because it is hygienically questionable and lacking in magnanimity — it also flies somewhat in the face of physics. After all, if every person in China spat in unison it would be more likely to cover their own country in phlegm: Beyond that, of course, the idea is derived from the inherently totalitarian, nationalistic and ever-so-slightly ludicrous thinking that, on some prearranged signal, all 1.3 billion Chinese might be made to spit on command. I just can’t see it happening, but perhaps those who have grown up in a totalitarian society, exposed to extreme nationalistic ideas, would find it more conceivable.
Certainly it does seem that way from recent comments made by Peking University professor Kong Qingdong (孔慶東). According to Kong, Taiwan’s presidential election was fake democracy at work and was of little consequence because, his reasoning goes, the victor didn’t even get 6 million votes, which is “not even equal to half the population of Beijing.”
If you follow that logic, the vast majority of democracies in the world are fake and of little consequence. You could argue, for example, that the number of people voting in a general election in the UK — whose population could hardly be considered small, and which has been a democracy for some time now — could be compared unfavorably to half the population of Sichuan Province.
What about half the population of Beijing or Sichuan? Even if it is unlikely everyone, even in a totalitarian society such as China, would act in unison — although this is not something someone with a totalitarian mindset like Kong would understand — Kong could still conceive of ensuring a landslide victory in Taiwan by manipulating the vote through underhanded tactics.
The spirit and value of democracy lie in not assuming that everyone is the same and in not imagining that they can all be herded in one direction or manipulated en masse. Democracy involves recognizing that society consists of rational beings subscribing to a wide range of different views who can make their own independent decisions and act upon their own initiative.
Regrettably, it seems that media baron Tsai Eng-ming (蔡衍明), forgetting how hard it has been to win democracy in Taiwan, has decided to become an apologist for China’s totalitarian society, championing unification with China and restricting what journalists working for his outlets include in their reports.
Nobody is saying that Taiwan’s democracy is perfect. There is much room for improvement. Perhaps one of the biggest problems with it at present is the lack of fair competition, a product of the dominance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). However, in the face of attitudes such as those of Kong and Tsai, we need to cherish and protect Taiwan’s democratic system and unequivocally reject the prospect of becoming a totalitarian society.
Chi Chun-chieh is a professor in the department of ethnic relations and cultures at National Dong Hwa University.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS