Abused in the street and shunned by her family, a Thai teenager will answer a police summons this week over claims she insulted the revered monarchy amid vehement debate about the kingdom’s lese majeste law.
Abhinya Sawatvarakorn, 19, who faced possible arrest on Saturday after being accused of making critical comments on Facebook two years ago, is the latest symbol of the ferocity of feeling around the issue in a deeply divided nation.
Known by her Internet alias Kanthoop, the teenager says she has been the victim of a witch hunt that has seen her barred from several universities and publicly vilified.
“I am afraid I will not receive justice, but I’m not afraid to be in jail,” she said on the campus of Thammasat University, the only establishment to accept her enrollement.
Kanthoop, who says the claims against her are based on maliciously edited screen grabs of her comments, wants the law, which carries a penalty of up to 15 years for each count, abolished.
Lese majeste, or Article 112 of the Thai criminal code, is designed to protect senior royals from insult, but academics say it has been politicized in recent years.
Many of those charged have been linked to the “Red Shirt” movement, supporters of ousted Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and other critics of the previous establishment-backed government.
The number of people charged with the offence has surged since Thaksin was deposed in a 2006 coup, making the law itself increasingly the subject of debate — even though powerful figures such as the army chief have suggested dissenters should leave the country.
David Streckfuss, an independent academic and expert on lese majeste, said the current public focus on the issue would have been “absolutely unimaginable” last year.
“People are becoming more and more used to debate over the law. The more they see it in the news, the more it is becoming part of the normal talk of the day,” he said.
The royal family is an extremely sensitive subject in Thailand, with 84-year-old Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej revered as a demi-god by many.
A total of 122 lese majeste cases were sent for prosecution from January to October last year, which Streckfuss said was in line with the level seen in 2009.
However, in 2010, when the country was rocked by deadly anti-government protests by the Red Shirts, there was a spike of 478 cases.
Thai academic Thitinan Pongsudhirak says the measure had left the country gripped by a “climate of fear” and warned reformists can become “radicalized” when debate is shut down.
“It is a self-fulfilling situation — fear and paranoia which aggravates and begets countervailing moves, which reinforce fear and paranoia,” he said.
Recent cases have sparked fierce debate, including over a 61-year-old man who was jailed in November last year for 20 years for sending text messages deemed insulting to the monarchy.
A US citizen in December was also handed two-and-a-half years in prison for allegedly defaming the king.
Social media Web sites such as Facebook and Twitter are providing a platform for both critics of the law and ultra-monarchists, who have encouraged Internet users to report posts that could violate lese majeste.
One group of legal academics, known as Nitirat, has drawn particular fire over its calls for amendment of the law. Founder Worachet Pakeerut said he has faced threats, blaming attempts to “create misunderstanding and hatred.”
The group is based at Thammasat, long considered a hub of political debate and the site of a bloody crackdown on student protesters in 1976.
Thitinan said some of Nitirat’s suggestions, such as making a future king swear an oath to protect the Constitution, were “unpalatable to Thai society” — but added that other recommendations including ending the practice whereby anyone can denounce anyone else were “very sensible.”
Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra said she would not amend the law, despite concerns raised by the US, the EU and the UN, in an apparent attempt to avoid the accusations of disloyalty leveled at her ousted brother.
However, Thitinan said some compromise would have to be reached.
“The royalists have to sort out their fallback position now, what concessions they are going to have to make to hold the line, because this line is not going to hold,” he said.
Streckfuss says lese majeste has become the “dividing line” in Thai society.
For Kanthoop, that division has torn her family apart — her sister wished her dead and her royalist father told her to change her name.
“I didn’t think it would come to this ... But I think I can live on my own and I’m proud of myself. I feel free,” she said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS