When he looks out from the time-frozen world of South Korea’s oldest private Confucian academy, Park Seok-hong sees the rest of the country “turning into a realm of beasts.”
He points to recent news reports as evidence: young people swearing at elderly passengers in the subway and children jumping to their deaths to escape bullying or the pressure of hyper-competitive school life.
“We may have built our economy, but our morality is on the verge of collapse,” Park said. “We must revitalize it, and this is where we can find an answer.”
Park is chief curator of Sosu Seowon, a complex of 11 lecture halls and dormitories that first opened in 1543 in this town 160km southeast of Seoul.
In South Korea, where “Confucian” has long been synonymous with “old fashioned,” people like Park have recently gained modest ground with their campaign to reawaken interest in Confucian teachings that emphasize communal harmony, respect for elders and loyalty to the state — principles that many older South Koreans believe have lost their grip on the young.
In the past five years, a steadily increasing number of schoolchildren — as many as 15,000 a year — have come here for a course on Confucian etiquette.
Elsewhere, about 150 other seowon, or Confucian academies, have reopened for similar extracurricular programs, National Association of Seowon executive director Park Sung-jin said.
“I came here so Grandpa will scold me less,” said Kang Ku-hyun, a sixth-grader from Seoul.
On a recent Monday, Ku-hyun’s mother had hustled him and his sister onto a bus. After a three-hour drive, the bus disgorged 40 elementary school pupils here for a “seowon stay.” For three days, the children sampled the life of Confucian students of old, receiving instruction that has long disappeared from the official school curriculum, including dinner and tea table etiquette and the proper ways of addressing one’s parents.
KNEES ACHE FROM KNEELING
“My knees ache from so much kneeling,” Ku-hyun’s sister, Kang Chae-won, 10, said after practicing deep bows from her position on the floor. “If nothing else, I learned how to bow properly. Grandpa will be pleased.”
Seowon stays are part of a broader trend that emerged about a decade ago in the wake of the Asian financial crisis, when South Korea suffered economic setbacks and rising unemployment and suicide rates. At the time, many people felt a keen sense of loss for the values that they believed had sustained older South Koreans through much greater hardships following the 1950 to 1953 Korean War.
In recent months, South Korea has also been gripped by soul-searching after half a dozen students who had been bullied at school took their own lives. A series of suicides by soldiers has also shocked the country, which depends on a conscript military to guard against North Korea.
To address this unease, Buddhist temples have begun offering “temple stays,” where city dwellers attempt meditation and poise. South Korean Marines run “survival camps,” where schoolchildren crawl through obstacle courses in a regimen designed to instill comradeship and perseverance.
Despite his dire warnings, Park does not go so far as to argue that the current school system should be replaced by Confucian academies, but he believes that it can learn a lot from the seowon.
Centuries ago, carefully selected boys from across Korea lived secluded lives on this campus surrounded by pine trees, a creek and a pond. They read Confucian classics and recited poems about nature. They began and ended their days by visiting a shrine where Confucian sages were venerated. They bowed twice, head touching the floor, before answering their teacher’s questions on the day’s reading.
In their heyday, more than 700 such academies dotted Korea, training applicants for the civil service and serving as guardians for the Confucianism that provided the ruling ideology of the Yi Dynasty (1392-1897).
There is an irony to the renewed interest in the seowon and Confucianism. For decades, many South Koreans strove to free themselves from the strictures of Confucian tradition, blaming it for things like the rigidly hierarchical corporate culture and a centuries-old preference for boys that led to rampant abortions of female fetuses.
ZEAL FOR EDUCATION
South Korean parents’ famed zeal for educating their children — an obsession both praised as the source of the country’s rapid economic development and criticized for the ills associated with high-pressure school life — is often traced to the seowon. The old institutes emphasized memorization of classic texts in preparation for the civil service exams and established the tradition of equating academic learning with social status.
The seowon were almost exclusively for boys from the elite yangban, or “scholar-official” class. The royal court supported many of them, allowing the young aristocrats to study for years without regard to cost. By the time all but 47 of the academies were shut down in 1865, they had become hotbeds of corruption and factional politics that weakened the dynasty long before Japan’s annexation of Korea in 1910.
Under Japanese colonial rule, which lasted until 1945, Korea adopted a universal education system with a Western-influenced curriculum. The seowon that still stood served mainly as shrines where tradition-minded Koreans held rites honoring Confucian sages.
Still, champions of the importance of the seowon in Korean history say that contemporary South Korea can learn much from the old.
When the seowon were functioning properly, “they emphasized character-building and harmony with nature,” said Lee Bae-yong, a historian and former president of the Ewha Womans University in Seoul.
Lee, now chair of the Presidential Council on Nation Branding, whose portfolio includes promoting South Korea’s international image, is leading a government campaign to get the seowon added to the UNESCO World Heritage list. In January, the UN agency granted nine seowon, including Sosu, tentative designations.
The old Confucian academics in white robes and high black hats are long gone from Sosu Seowon. Instead, tourists peer into lecture halls decorated with Confucian dictums.
Much of the seowon stay program actually takes place in an adjacent replica village where aspects of an older lifestyle — weaving rice-straw mats, riding in ox carts, reciting Confucian texts — are enacted for tourists.
Park, the chief curator, can go on for hours about what he thinks is wrong with the “trash education” of today — an overemphasis on English and mathematics at the expense of ethics and history. However, even he says that preaching Confucianism in South Korea today may have its limits.
Over the past two decades, he has seized every opportunity to promote Confucian learning — to everyone from government officials to visiting tourists.
“They accept one-tenth of what I say,” Park said. “They look at me as if I were crazy, ultraconservative, out of fashion. I feel like an outcast.”
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its